Cargando…
Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
BACKGROUND: Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus and Isatis indigotica Fortune are very inconsistent in their morphological characteristics, but the Flora of China treats them as the same species. In this work, a new technology that differs from conventional barcodes is developed to prove that they are differe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8 |
_version_ | 1785092314980417536 |
---|---|
author | Su, Yong Zhang, Man Guo, Qiaosheng Wei, Min Shi, Hongzhuan Wang, Tao Han, Zhengzhou Liu, Huihui Liu, Chang Huang, Jianmin |
author_facet | Su, Yong Zhang, Man Guo, Qiaosheng Wei, Min Shi, Hongzhuan Wang, Tao Han, Zhengzhou Liu, Huihui Liu, Chang Huang, Jianmin |
author_sort | Su, Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus and Isatis indigotica Fortune are very inconsistent in their morphological characteristics, but the Flora of China treats them as the same species. In this work, a new technology that differs from conventional barcodes is developed to prove that they are different species and to clarify their classification. RESULTS AND METHODS: I. indigotica was indistinguishable from I. tinctoria when using ITS2. CPGAVAS2 was used to construct the chloroplast genomes. MAFFT and DnaSP were used to calculate nucleotide polymorphism, the chloroplast genomes of the two have high diversity in the rpl32 ~ trnL-UAG short region. When using this region as a mini barcode, it was found that there are obvious differences in the base numbers of I. tinctoria and different ploidy I. indigotica were found, but diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica had the same number of bases. Moreover, the reconstruction of the maximum likelihood (ML) tree, utilizing the mini-barcode, demonstrated that I. tinctoria and both diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica are located on distinct branches. The genome size of tetraploid I. indigotica was approximately 643.773 MB, the heterozygosity rate was approximately 0.98%, and the repeat sequence content was approximately 90.43%. This species has a highly heterozygous, extremely repetitive genome. CONCLUSION: A new method was established to differentiate between I. indigotica and I. tinctoria. Furthermore, this approach provides a reference and basis for the directional breeding of Isatis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10436401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104364012023-08-19 Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes Su, Yong Zhang, Man Guo, Qiaosheng Wei, Min Shi, Hongzhuan Wang, Tao Han, Zhengzhou Liu, Huihui Liu, Chang Huang, Jianmin BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus and Isatis indigotica Fortune are very inconsistent in their morphological characteristics, but the Flora of China treats them as the same species. In this work, a new technology that differs from conventional barcodes is developed to prove that they are different species and to clarify their classification. RESULTS AND METHODS: I. indigotica was indistinguishable from I. tinctoria when using ITS2. CPGAVAS2 was used to construct the chloroplast genomes. MAFFT and DnaSP were used to calculate nucleotide polymorphism, the chloroplast genomes of the two have high diversity in the rpl32 ~ trnL-UAG short region. When using this region as a mini barcode, it was found that there are obvious differences in the base numbers of I. tinctoria and different ploidy I. indigotica were found, but diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica had the same number of bases. Moreover, the reconstruction of the maximum likelihood (ML) tree, utilizing the mini-barcode, demonstrated that I. tinctoria and both diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica are located on distinct branches. The genome size of tetraploid I. indigotica was approximately 643.773 MB, the heterozygosity rate was approximately 0.98%, and the repeat sequence content was approximately 90.43%. This species has a highly heterozygous, extremely repetitive genome. CONCLUSION: A new method was established to differentiate between I. indigotica and I. tinctoria. Furthermore, this approach provides a reference and basis for the directional breeding of Isatis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8. BioMed Central 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10436401/ /pubmed/37596543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Su, Yong Zhang, Man Guo, Qiaosheng Wei, Min Shi, Hongzhuan Wang, Tao Han, Zhengzhou Liu, Huihui Liu, Chang Huang, Jianmin Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
title | Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
title_full | Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
title_fullStr | Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
title_short | Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
title_sort | classification of isatis indigotica fortune and isatis tinctoria linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suyong classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT zhangman classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT guoqiaosheng classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT weimin classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT shihongzhuan classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT wangtao classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT hanzhengzhou classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT liuhuihui classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT liuchang classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes AT huangjianmin classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes |