Cargando…

Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes

BACKGROUND: Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus and Isatis indigotica Fortune are very inconsistent in their morphological characteristics, but the Flora of China treats them as the same species. In this work, a new technology that differs from conventional barcodes is developed to prove that they are differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Yong, Zhang, Man, Guo, Qiaosheng, Wei, Min, Shi, Hongzhuan, Wang, Tao, Han, Zhengzhou, Liu, Huihui, Liu, Chang, Huang, Jianmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8
_version_ 1785092314980417536
author Su, Yong
Zhang, Man
Guo, Qiaosheng
Wei, Min
Shi, Hongzhuan
Wang, Tao
Han, Zhengzhou
Liu, Huihui
Liu, Chang
Huang, Jianmin
author_facet Su, Yong
Zhang, Man
Guo, Qiaosheng
Wei, Min
Shi, Hongzhuan
Wang, Tao
Han, Zhengzhou
Liu, Huihui
Liu, Chang
Huang, Jianmin
author_sort Su, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus and Isatis indigotica Fortune are very inconsistent in their morphological characteristics, but the Flora of China treats them as the same species. In this work, a new technology that differs from conventional barcodes is developed to prove that they are different species and to clarify their classification. RESULTS AND METHODS: I. indigotica was indistinguishable from I. tinctoria when using ITS2. CPGAVAS2 was used to construct the chloroplast genomes. MAFFT and DnaSP were used to calculate nucleotide polymorphism, the chloroplast genomes of the two have high diversity in the rpl32 ~ trnL-UAG short region. When using this region as a mini barcode, it was found that there are obvious differences in the base numbers of I. tinctoria and different ploidy I. indigotica were found, but diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica had the same number of bases. Moreover, the reconstruction of the maximum likelihood (ML) tree, utilizing the mini-barcode, demonstrated that I. tinctoria and both diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica are located on distinct branches. The genome size of tetraploid I. indigotica was approximately 643.773 MB, the heterozygosity rate was approximately 0.98%, and the repeat sequence content was approximately 90.43%. This species has a highly heterozygous, extremely repetitive genome. CONCLUSION: A new method was established to differentiate between I. indigotica and I. tinctoria. Furthermore, this approach provides a reference and basis for the directional breeding of Isatis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10436401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104364012023-08-19 Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes Su, Yong Zhang, Man Guo, Qiaosheng Wei, Min Shi, Hongzhuan Wang, Tao Han, Zhengzhou Liu, Huihui Liu, Chang Huang, Jianmin BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus and Isatis indigotica Fortune are very inconsistent in their morphological characteristics, but the Flora of China treats them as the same species. In this work, a new technology that differs from conventional barcodes is developed to prove that they are different species and to clarify their classification. RESULTS AND METHODS: I. indigotica was indistinguishable from I. tinctoria when using ITS2. CPGAVAS2 was used to construct the chloroplast genomes. MAFFT and DnaSP were used to calculate nucleotide polymorphism, the chloroplast genomes of the two have high diversity in the rpl32 ~ trnL-UAG short region. When using this region as a mini barcode, it was found that there are obvious differences in the base numbers of I. tinctoria and different ploidy I. indigotica were found, but diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica had the same number of bases. Moreover, the reconstruction of the maximum likelihood (ML) tree, utilizing the mini-barcode, demonstrated that I. tinctoria and both diploid and tetraploid I. indigotica are located on distinct branches. The genome size of tetraploid I. indigotica was approximately 643.773 MB, the heterozygosity rate was approximately 0.98%, and the repeat sequence content was approximately 90.43%. This species has a highly heterozygous, extremely repetitive genome. CONCLUSION: A new method was established to differentiate between I. indigotica and I. tinctoria. Furthermore, this approach provides a reference and basis for the directional breeding of Isatis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8. BioMed Central 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10436401/ /pubmed/37596543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Su, Yong
Zhang, Man
Guo, Qiaosheng
Wei, Min
Shi, Hongzhuan
Wang, Tao
Han, Zhengzhou
Liu, Huihui
Liu, Chang
Huang, Jianmin
Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
title Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
title_full Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
title_fullStr Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
title_short Classification of Isatis indigotica Fortune and Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
title_sort classification of isatis indigotica fortune and isatis tinctoria linnaeus via comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09534-8
work_keys_str_mv AT suyong classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT zhangman classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT guoqiaosheng classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT weimin classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT shihongzhuan classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT wangtao classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT hanzhengzhou classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT liuhuihui classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT liuchang classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes
AT huangjianmin classificationofisatisindigoticafortuneandisatistinctorialinnaeusviacomparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomes