Cargando…

Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study

Purpose: To analyze and compare sensitive in vivo characteristics for screening early keratoconus. Methods: This multicenter, case-control study included 712 eyes, after matching for age and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure, from three clinics in different cities. The keratoconus (n =...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xuan, Cao, Huazheng, Huo, Yan, Song, Jiaxin, Zou, Haohan, Li, Jing, Hou, Jie, Wang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1158299
_version_ 1785092347449573376
author Chen, Xuan
Cao, Huazheng
Huo, Yan
Song, Jiaxin
Zou, Haohan
Li, Jing
Hou, Jie
Wang, Yan
author_facet Chen, Xuan
Cao, Huazheng
Huo, Yan
Song, Jiaxin
Zou, Haohan
Li, Jing
Hou, Jie
Wang, Yan
author_sort Chen, Xuan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To analyze and compare sensitive in vivo characteristics for screening early keratoconus. Methods: This multicenter, case-control study included 712 eyes, after matching for age and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure, from three clinics in different cities. The keratoconus (n = 288), early keratoconus (n = 91), and normal cornea (n = 333) groups included eyes diagnosed with bilateral keratoconus, fellow eyes with relatively normal topography with unilateral keratoconus, and normal eyes before refractive surgery, respectively. After adjusting for central corneal thickness, differences in vivo characteristics were analyzed among the three groups. The in vivo characteristics were measured by Pentacam and Corvis ST. Fifty-four indices were evaluated to screen for a sensitive index for the detection of early keratoconus. Results: Significant differences were observed in 26 of the 36 corneal biomechanical indeces between the early keratoconus and normal corneas. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of tomographic and biomechanical index, Belin/Ambrósio deviation, and Da in differentiating keratoconus from normal cornea was 1.000. Among the top five indeces of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detecting early keratoconus, the corneal biomechanical-related index accounted for 80% (4/5), including A1 dArc length, highest concavity radius, A2 time, and tomographic and biomechanical index, of which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of A1 dArc length was 0.901. Conclusion: A1 dArc length and several corneal biomechanical indices are highly sensitive for the detection of early keratoconus, even in the absence of topographic abnormalities. Ophthalmologists should focus on the clinical application of corneal biomechanics and combine corneal tomography for the timely and accurate detection of early keratoconus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10436515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104365152023-08-19 Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study Chen, Xuan Cao, Huazheng Huo, Yan Song, Jiaxin Zou, Haohan Li, Jing Hou, Jie Wang, Yan Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Purpose: To analyze and compare sensitive in vivo characteristics for screening early keratoconus. Methods: This multicenter, case-control study included 712 eyes, after matching for age and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure, from three clinics in different cities. The keratoconus (n = 288), early keratoconus (n = 91), and normal cornea (n = 333) groups included eyes diagnosed with bilateral keratoconus, fellow eyes with relatively normal topography with unilateral keratoconus, and normal eyes before refractive surgery, respectively. After adjusting for central corneal thickness, differences in vivo characteristics were analyzed among the three groups. The in vivo characteristics were measured by Pentacam and Corvis ST. Fifty-four indices were evaluated to screen for a sensitive index for the detection of early keratoconus. Results: Significant differences were observed in 26 of the 36 corneal biomechanical indeces between the early keratoconus and normal corneas. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of tomographic and biomechanical index, Belin/Ambrósio deviation, and Da in differentiating keratoconus from normal cornea was 1.000. Among the top five indeces of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detecting early keratoconus, the corneal biomechanical-related index accounted for 80% (4/5), including A1 dArc length, highest concavity radius, A2 time, and tomographic and biomechanical index, of which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of A1 dArc length was 0.901. Conclusion: A1 dArc length and several corneal biomechanical indices are highly sensitive for the detection of early keratoconus, even in the absence of topographic abnormalities. Ophthalmologists should focus on the clinical application of corneal biomechanics and combine corneal tomography for the timely and accurate detection of early keratoconus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10436515/ /pubmed/37600309 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1158299 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen, Cao, Huo, Song, Zou, Li, Hou and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Chen, Xuan
Cao, Huazheng
Huo, Yan
Song, Jiaxin
Zou, Haohan
Li, Jing
Hou, Jie
Wang, Yan
Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
title Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
title_full Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
title_fullStr Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
title_short Screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
title_sort screening of sensitive in vivo characteristics for early keratoconus diagnosis: a multicenter study
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1158299
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxuan screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT caohuazheng screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT huoyan screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT songjiaxin screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT zouhaohan screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT lijing screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT houjie screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy
AT wangyan screeningofsensitiveinvivocharacteristicsforearlykeratoconusdiagnosisamulticenterstudy