Cargando…

Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity

INTRODUCTION: Wearable near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measurements of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO(2)) demonstrated good test–retest reliability at rest. We hypothesized SmO(2) measured with the Moxy monitor at the vastus lateralis (VL) would demonstrate good reliability across intensities. For...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yogev, Assaf, Arnold, Jem, Nelson, Hannah, Clarke, David C., Guenette, Jordan A., Sporer, Ben C., Koehle, Michael S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1143393
_version_ 1785092372278804480
author Yogev, Assaf
Arnold, Jem
Nelson, Hannah
Clarke, David C.
Guenette, Jordan A.
Sporer, Ben C.
Koehle, Michael S.
author_facet Yogev, Assaf
Arnold, Jem
Nelson, Hannah
Clarke, David C.
Guenette, Jordan A.
Sporer, Ben C.
Koehle, Michael S.
author_sort Yogev, Assaf
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Wearable near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measurements of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO(2)) demonstrated good test–retest reliability at rest. We hypothesized SmO(2) measured with the Moxy monitor at the vastus lateralis (VL) would demonstrate good reliability across intensities. For relative reliability, SmO(2) will be lower than volume of oxygen consumption (V̇O(2)) and heart rate (HR), higher than concentration of blood lactate accumulation ([BLa]) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). We aimed to estimate the reliability of SmO(2) and common physiological measures across exercise intensities, as well as to quantify within-participant agreement between sessions. METHODS: Twenty-one trained cyclists completed two trials of an incremental multi-stage cycling test with 5 min constant workload steps starting at 1.0 watt per kg bodyweight (W·kg(−1)) and increasing by 0.5 W kg(−1) per step, separated by 1 min passive recovery intervals until maximal task tolerance. SmO(2), HR, V̇O(2), [BLa], and RPE were recorded for each stage. Continuous measures were averaged over the final 60 s of each stage. Relative reliability at the lowest, median, and highest work stages was quantified as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability and within-subject agreement were quantified as standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). RESULTS: Comparisons between trials showed no significant differences within each exercise intensity for all outcome variables. ICC for SmO(2) was 0.81–0.90 across exercise intensity. ICC for HR, V̇O(2), [BLa], and RPE were 0.87–0.92, 0.73–0.97, 0.44–0.74, 0.29–0.70, respectively. SEM (95% CI) for SmO(2) was 5 (3–7), 6 (4–9), and 7 (5–10)%, and MDC was 12%, 16%, and 18%. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for SmO(2) across intensity during an incremental multi-stage cycling test. V̇O(2) and HR had excellent reliability, higher than SmO(2). [BLa] and RPE had lower reliability than SmO(2). Muscle oxygen saturation measured by wearable NIRS was found to have similar reliability to V̇O(2) and HR, and higher than [BLa] and RPE across exercise intensity, suggesting that it is appropriate for everyday use as a non-invasive method of monitoring internal load alongside other metrics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10436610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104366102023-08-19 Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity Yogev, Assaf Arnold, Jem Nelson, Hannah Clarke, David C. Guenette, Jordan A. Sporer, Ben C. Koehle, Michael S. Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living INTRODUCTION: Wearable near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measurements of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO(2)) demonstrated good test–retest reliability at rest. We hypothesized SmO(2) measured with the Moxy monitor at the vastus lateralis (VL) would demonstrate good reliability across intensities. For relative reliability, SmO(2) will be lower than volume of oxygen consumption (V̇O(2)) and heart rate (HR), higher than concentration of blood lactate accumulation ([BLa]) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). We aimed to estimate the reliability of SmO(2) and common physiological measures across exercise intensities, as well as to quantify within-participant agreement between sessions. METHODS: Twenty-one trained cyclists completed two trials of an incremental multi-stage cycling test with 5 min constant workload steps starting at 1.0 watt per kg bodyweight (W·kg(−1)) and increasing by 0.5 W kg(−1) per step, separated by 1 min passive recovery intervals until maximal task tolerance. SmO(2), HR, V̇O(2), [BLa], and RPE were recorded for each stage. Continuous measures were averaged over the final 60 s of each stage. Relative reliability at the lowest, median, and highest work stages was quantified as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability and within-subject agreement were quantified as standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). RESULTS: Comparisons between trials showed no significant differences within each exercise intensity for all outcome variables. ICC for SmO(2) was 0.81–0.90 across exercise intensity. ICC for HR, V̇O(2), [BLa], and RPE were 0.87–0.92, 0.73–0.97, 0.44–0.74, 0.29–0.70, respectively. SEM (95% CI) for SmO(2) was 5 (3–7), 6 (4–9), and 7 (5–10)%, and MDC was 12%, 16%, and 18%. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for SmO(2) across intensity during an incremental multi-stage cycling test. V̇O(2) and HR had excellent reliability, higher than SmO(2). [BLa] and RPE had lower reliability than SmO(2). Muscle oxygen saturation measured by wearable NIRS was found to have similar reliability to V̇O(2) and HR, and higher than [BLa] and RPE across exercise intensity, suggesting that it is appropriate for everyday use as a non-invasive method of monitoring internal load alongside other metrics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10436610/ /pubmed/37601168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1143393 Text en © 2023 Yogev, Arnold, Nelson, Clarke, Guenette, Sporer and Koehle. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Yogev, Assaf
Arnold, Jem
Nelson, Hannah
Clarke, David C.
Guenette, Jordan A.
Sporer, Ben C.
Koehle, Michael S.
Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
title Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
title_full Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
title_fullStr Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
title_short Comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
title_sort comparing the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation with common performance and physiological markers across cycling exercise intensity
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1143393
work_keys_str_mv AT yogevassaf comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity
AT arnoldjem comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity
AT nelsonhannah comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity
AT clarkedavidc comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity
AT guenettejordana comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity
AT sporerbenc comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity
AT koehlemichaels comparingthereliabilityofmuscleoxygensaturationwithcommonperformanceandphysiologicalmarkersacrosscyclingexerciseintensity