Cargando…
Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000020 |
_version_ | 1785092463120089088 |
---|---|
author | Al Khaldi, Maher Ponomarev, Alexander Richard, Carole Dagbert, François Sebajang, Herawaty Schwenter, Frank Wassef, Ramses De Broux, Éric Ratelle, Richard Paquin, Sarto C. Sahai, Anand V. Loungnarath, Rasmy |
author_facet | Al Khaldi, Maher Ponomarev, Alexander Richard, Carole Dagbert, François Sebajang, Herawaty Schwenter, Frank Wassef, Ramses De Broux, Éric Ratelle, Richard Paquin, Sarto C. Sahai, Anand V. Loungnarath, Rasmy |
author_sort | Al Khaldi, Maher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 2020 at a single quaternary institution. EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage via the transrectal route was performed in all patients with or without drain/stent placement. Technical and clinical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage was analyzed. Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact test were performed. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients were included in the study (53.5% male; mean age, 53.8 ± 17.9 years). Pelvic abscesses occurred mainly postoperatively (33 cases; 60.0%) and from complicated diverticulitis (14 cases; 23.3%). Mean diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (80% unilocular). Drainage was performed with EUS-guided stent placement (double-pigtail plastic or lumen-apposing metal) in 74.5% of cases and with aspiration alone for the remainder. Technical success occurred in 58 cases (97%). Of those with long-term follow-up after EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage (n = 55; 91.7%), complete abscess resolution occurred in 72.7% of all cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases (14.5%) and persisted in 7 patients (12.5%), 7 of which were successfully retreated with EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Accounting for these successful reinterventions, the overall rate of abscess resolution was 85.5%. Abscess resolution rate improved with drain placement (83%). Accounting for 7 repeat EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainages, overall abscess resolution improved. Two deaths occurred (3.4%) because of sepsis from failed source control in patients who had previously failed medical, radiological, and surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and an effective alternative to radiological or open surgical drainage. It also offers favorable clinical outcomes in different clinical situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10437202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104372022023-09-08 Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage Al Khaldi, Maher Ponomarev, Alexander Richard, Carole Dagbert, François Sebajang, Herawaty Schwenter, Frank Wassef, Ramses De Broux, Éric Ratelle, Richard Paquin, Sarto C. Sahai, Anand V. Loungnarath, Rasmy Endosc Ultrasound Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 2020 at a single quaternary institution. EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage via the transrectal route was performed in all patients with or without drain/stent placement. Technical and clinical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage was analyzed. Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact test were performed. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients were included in the study (53.5% male; mean age, 53.8 ± 17.9 years). Pelvic abscesses occurred mainly postoperatively (33 cases; 60.0%) and from complicated diverticulitis (14 cases; 23.3%). Mean diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (80% unilocular). Drainage was performed with EUS-guided stent placement (double-pigtail plastic or lumen-apposing metal) in 74.5% of cases and with aspiration alone for the remainder. Technical success occurred in 58 cases (97%). Of those with long-term follow-up after EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage (n = 55; 91.7%), complete abscess resolution occurred in 72.7% of all cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases (14.5%) and persisted in 7 patients (12.5%), 7 of which were successfully retreated with EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Accounting for these successful reinterventions, the overall rate of abscess resolution was 85.5%. Abscess resolution rate improved with drain placement (83%). Accounting for 7 repeat EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainages, overall abscess resolution improved. Two deaths occurred (3.4%) because of sepsis from failed source control in patients who had previously failed medical, radiological, and surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and an effective alternative to radiological or open surgical drainage. It also offers favorable clinical outcomes in different clinical situations. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10437202/ /pubmed/37693116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000020 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Scholar Media Publishing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Al Khaldi, Maher Ponomarev, Alexander Richard, Carole Dagbert, François Sebajang, Herawaty Schwenter, Frank Wassef, Ramses De Broux, Éric Ratelle, Richard Paquin, Sarto C. Sahai, Anand V. Loungnarath, Rasmy Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
title | Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
title_full | Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
title_fullStr | Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
title_short | Safety and clinical efficacy of EUS–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
title_sort | safety and clinical efficacy of eus–guided pelvic abscess drainage |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alkhaldimaher safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT ponomarevalexander safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT richardcarole safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT dagbertfrancois safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT sebajangherawaty safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT schwenterfrank safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT wasseframses safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT debrouxeric safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT ratellerichard safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT paquinsartoc safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT sahaianandv safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage AT loungnarathrasmy safetyandclinicalefficacyofeusguidedpelvicabscessdrainage |