Cargando…

Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin

OBJECTIVES: (1) Describe the relevance of off-label use of gabapentin to managed care pharmacy; (2) summarize recent FDA warnings and media reports related to off-label gabapentin use; (3) review medical information pertaining to the off-label use of gabapentin; (4) outline alternatives to off-label...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mack, Alicia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14664664
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.6.559
_version_ 1785092485797642240
author Mack, Alicia
author_facet Mack, Alicia
author_sort Mack, Alicia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (1) Describe the relevance of off-label use of gabapentin to managed care pharmacy; (2) summarize recent FDA warnings and media reports related to off-label gabapentin use; (3) review medical information pertaining to the off-label use of gabapentin; (4) outline alternatives to off-label use of gabapentin in an evidence-based fashion, where literature exists to support such alternatives; and (5) encourage key clinicians and decision makers in managed care pharmacy to develop and support programs that restrict the use of gabapentin to specific evidence-based situations. SUMMARY: Gabapentin is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adjunctive therapy in treatment of partial seizures and postherpetic neuralgia. Various off-label (unapproved) uses have been reported, and the use of gabapentin for off-label purposes has reportedly exceeded use for FDA approved indications. Pharmaceutical marketing practices and physician dissatisfaction with currently available pharmacological treatment options may be key factors that contribute to this prescribing trend. Recently, the media has focused on these issues, noting that many cases of reported safety and effectiveness of gabapentin for off-label use may have been fabricated. A thorough review of the medical and pharmacy literature related to off-label use of gabapentin was performed, and a summary of the literature for the following conditions is presented: bipolar disorder, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, complex regional pain syndrome, attention deficit disorder, restless legs syndrome, trigeminal neuralgia, periodic limb movement disorder of sleep, migraine headaches, and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. A common theme in the medical literature for gabapentin is the prevalence of open-label studies and a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials for all but a small number of indications. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of circumstances where it has reported potential for off-label use, gabapentin is not the optimal treatment. The off-label use of gabapentin for indications not approved by the FDA should be reserved for cases where there is solid research support (e.g., diabetic neuropathy and prophylaxis of frequent migraine headaches). Managed care pharmacists should develop programs to restrict the use of gabapentin to these specific evidence-based situations, and key decision makers in managed care practice should feel confident in supporting these use restrictions for gabapentin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10437292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104372922023-08-21 Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin Mack, Alicia J Manag Care Pharm Contemporary Subjects OBJECTIVES: (1) Describe the relevance of off-label use of gabapentin to managed care pharmacy; (2) summarize recent FDA warnings and media reports related to off-label gabapentin use; (3) review medical information pertaining to the off-label use of gabapentin; (4) outline alternatives to off-label use of gabapentin in an evidence-based fashion, where literature exists to support such alternatives; and (5) encourage key clinicians and decision makers in managed care pharmacy to develop and support programs that restrict the use of gabapentin to specific evidence-based situations. SUMMARY: Gabapentin is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adjunctive therapy in treatment of partial seizures and postherpetic neuralgia. Various off-label (unapproved) uses have been reported, and the use of gabapentin for off-label purposes has reportedly exceeded use for FDA approved indications. Pharmaceutical marketing practices and physician dissatisfaction with currently available pharmacological treatment options may be key factors that contribute to this prescribing trend. Recently, the media has focused on these issues, noting that many cases of reported safety and effectiveness of gabapentin for off-label use may have been fabricated. A thorough review of the medical and pharmacy literature related to off-label use of gabapentin was performed, and a summary of the literature for the following conditions is presented: bipolar disorder, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, complex regional pain syndrome, attention deficit disorder, restless legs syndrome, trigeminal neuralgia, periodic limb movement disorder of sleep, migraine headaches, and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. A common theme in the medical literature for gabapentin is the prevalence of open-label studies and a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials for all but a small number of indications. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of circumstances where it has reported potential for off-label use, gabapentin is not the optimal treatment. The off-label use of gabapentin for indications not approved by the FDA should be reserved for cases where there is solid research support (e.g., diabetic neuropathy and prophylaxis of frequent migraine headaches). Managed care pharmacists should develop programs to restrict the use of gabapentin to these specific evidence-based situations, and key decision makers in managed care practice should feel confident in supporting these use restrictions for gabapentin. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2003-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10437292/ /pubmed/14664664 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.6.559 Text en Copyright © 2003, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Contemporary Subjects
Mack, Alicia
Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin
title Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin
title_full Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin
title_fullStr Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin
title_full_unstemmed Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin
title_short Examination of the Evidence for Off-Label Use of Gabapentin
title_sort examination of the evidence for off-label use of gabapentin
topic Contemporary Subjects
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14664664
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.6.559
work_keys_str_mv AT mackalicia examinationoftheevidenceforofflabeluseofgabapentin