Cargando…

Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies

BACKGROUND: Computerized drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening is widely used to identify potentially harmful drug combinations in the inpatient and outpatient setting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening software in identifying select clinically signific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abarca, Jacob, Colon, Lisa R., Wang, Victoria S., Malone, Daniel C., Murphy, John E., Armstrong, Edward P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792445
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.5.383
_version_ 1785092573422944256
author Abarca, Jacob
Colon, Lisa R.
Wang, Victoria S.
Malone, Daniel C.
Murphy, John E.
Armstrong, Edward P.
author_facet Abarca, Jacob
Colon, Lisa R.
Wang, Victoria S.
Malone, Daniel C.
Murphy, John E.
Armstrong, Edward P.
author_sort Abarca, Jacob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computerized drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening is widely used to identify potentially harmful drug combinations in the inpatient and outpatient setting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening software in identifying select clinically significant DDIs in pharmacy computer systems in community and hospital pharmacies. METHODS: Ten community pharmacies and 10 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area were invited to participate in the study in 2004. To test the performance of each of the systems used by the pharmacies, 25 medications were used to create 6 mock patient profiles containing 37 drug-drug pairs, 16 of which are clinically meaningful DDIs that pose a potential risk to patient safety. Each profile was entered into the computer pharmacy system, and the system response in terms of the presence or absence of a DDI alert was recorded for each drug pair. The percentage of correct responses and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each system to correctly classify each drug pair as a DDI or not was calculated. Summary statistics of these measures were calculated separately for community and hospital pharmacies. RESULTS: Eight community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area agreed to participate in the study. The median sensitivity and median specificity for community pharmacies was 0.88 (range, 0.81-0.94) and 0.91 (range, 0.67-1.00), respectively. For hospital pharmacies, the median sensitivity and median specificity was 0.38 (range, 0.15-0.94) and 0.95 (range, 0.81-0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this convenience sample of 8 community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in 1 metropolitan area, the performance of community pharmacy computer systems in screening DDIs appears to have improved over the last several years compared with research published previously in 2001. However, significant variation remains in the performance of hospital pharmacy computer systems, even among systems manufactured by the same vendor. Future research should focus on improving the performance of these systems in accurately and precisely identifying DDIs with a high probability of resulting in true potential adverse effects on clinical outcomes and creating a low noise ratio associated with false-positive alerts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10437630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104376302023-08-21 Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies Abarca, Jacob Colon, Lisa R. Wang, Victoria S. Malone, Daniel C. Murphy, John E. Armstrong, Edward P. J Manag Care Pharm Contemporary Subject BACKGROUND: Computerized drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening is widely used to identify potentially harmful drug combinations in the inpatient and outpatient setting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening software in identifying select clinically significant DDIs in pharmacy computer systems in community and hospital pharmacies. METHODS: Ten community pharmacies and 10 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area were invited to participate in the study in 2004. To test the performance of each of the systems used by the pharmacies, 25 medications were used to create 6 mock patient profiles containing 37 drug-drug pairs, 16 of which are clinically meaningful DDIs that pose a potential risk to patient safety. Each profile was entered into the computer pharmacy system, and the system response in terms of the presence or absence of a DDI alert was recorded for each drug pair. The percentage of correct responses and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each system to correctly classify each drug pair as a DDI or not was calculated. Summary statistics of these measures were calculated separately for community and hospital pharmacies. RESULTS: Eight community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area agreed to participate in the study. The median sensitivity and median specificity for community pharmacies was 0.88 (range, 0.81-0.94) and 0.91 (range, 0.67-1.00), respectively. For hospital pharmacies, the median sensitivity and median specificity was 0.38 (range, 0.15-0.94) and 0.95 (range, 0.81-0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this convenience sample of 8 community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in 1 metropolitan area, the performance of community pharmacy computer systems in screening DDIs appears to have improved over the last several years compared with research published previously in 2001. However, significant variation remains in the performance of hospital pharmacy computer systems, even among systems manufactured by the same vendor. Future research should focus on improving the performance of these systems in accurately and precisely identifying DDIs with a high probability of resulting in true potential adverse effects on clinical outcomes and creating a low noise ratio associated with false-positive alerts. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2006-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10437630/ /pubmed/16792445 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.5.383 Text en Copyright © 2006, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Contemporary Subject
Abarca, Jacob
Colon, Lisa R.
Wang, Victoria S.
Malone, Daniel C.
Murphy, John E.
Armstrong, Edward P.
Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies
title Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies
title_full Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies
title_short Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies
title_sort evaluation of the performance of drug-drug interaction screening software in community and hospital pharmacies
topic Contemporary Subject
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792445
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.5.383
work_keys_str_mv AT abarcajacob evaluationoftheperformanceofdrugdruginteractionscreeningsoftwareincommunityandhospitalpharmacies
AT colonlisar evaluationoftheperformanceofdrugdruginteractionscreeningsoftwareincommunityandhospitalpharmacies
AT wangvictorias evaluationoftheperformanceofdrugdruginteractionscreeningsoftwareincommunityandhospitalpharmacies
AT malonedanielc evaluationoftheperformanceofdrugdruginteractionscreeningsoftwareincommunityandhospitalpharmacies
AT murphyjohne evaluationoftheperformanceofdrugdruginteractionscreeningsoftwareincommunityandhospitalpharmacies
AT armstrongedwardp evaluationoftheperformanceofdrugdruginteractionscreeningsoftwareincommunityandhospitalpharmacies