Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin, doxazosin, or terazosin as initial treatments for moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) over a 3-year time horizon from a health-system-payer perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic model is used to project the course of treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohsfeldt, Robert L., Kreder, Karl J., Klein, Robert W., Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15369424
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2004.10.5.412
_version_ 1785092619123032064
author Ohsfeldt, Robert L.
Kreder, Karl J.
Klein, Robert W.
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Ohsfeldt, Robert L.
Kreder, Karl J.
Klein, Robert W.
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Ohsfeldt, Robert L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin, doxazosin, or terazosin as initial treatments for moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) over a 3-year time horizon from a health-system-payer perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic model is used to project the course of treatment at 6-month intervals over 3 years following initiation of therapy with tamsulosin, doxazosin, or terazosin. Treatment failure is defined as failure to attain and maintain a 25% improvement in the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score from baseline. In the model, finasteride is added for patients who fail on their initial therapy and, in the event of finasteride treatment failure, patients progress to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and, if needed, a second TURP. The ranges of values for treatment failure rates and clinical event cost parameters used in the decision model are derived from the literature. Only direct medical costs related to BPH and its treatment are included. Since 2 comparators are available generically (doxazosin and terazosin) drug acquisition costs are defined by the list prices at Drugstore.com. All costs are discounted by 3% per year. Effectiveness is measured as successful medical treatment without surgery over 3 years. RESULTS: For base-case model parameters, discounted BPH-related total direct medical costs over 3 years are $4084, $4323, and $4695 for generic terazosin, generic doxazosin, and tamsulosin, respectively. The model estimates a medical treatment success rate (no TURP) at 3 years of 72.3% for tamsulosin, compared with 68.2% for both terazosin and doxazosin. The incremental cost for tamsulosin versus terazosin is $610 over 3 years, which yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $14,609 per success. Generic doxazosin is dominated (higher cost but equal effectiveness compared with terazosin). Higher rates of twice daily (or 2 units per day) dosing are associated with higher incremental cost effectiveness ratios. The decision-model results also are sensitive to the estimated costs of TURP and hypotensive adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: As an initial medical therapy for moderate BPH, tamsulosin is more effective than generic terazosin or doxazosin, with an incremental cost of about $203 per year (or about $17 per month) over 3 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10437807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104378072023-08-21 Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Ohsfeldt, Robert L. Kreder, Karl J. Klein, Robert W. Chrischilles, Elizabeth A. J Manag Care Pharm Formulary Management OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin, doxazosin, or terazosin as initial treatments for moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) over a 3-year time horizon from a health-system-payer perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic model is used to project the course of treatment at 6-month intervals over 3 years following initiation of therapy with tamsulosin, doxazosin, or terazosin. Treatment failure is defined as failure to attain and maintain a 25% improvement in the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score from baseline. In the model, finasteride is added for patients who fail on their initial therapy and, in the event of finasteride treatment failure, patients progress to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and, if needed, a second TURP. The ranges of values for treatment failure rates and clinical event cost parameters used in the decision model are derived from the literature. Only direct medical costs related to BPH and its treatment are included. Since 2 comparators are available generically (doxazosin and terazosin) drug acquisition costs are defined by the list prices at Drugstore.com. All costs are discounted by 3% per year. Effectiveness is measured as successful medical treatment without surgery over 3 years. RESULTS: For base-case model parameters, discounted BPH-related total direct medical costs over 3 years are $4084, $4323, and $4695 for generic terazosin, generic doxazosin, and tamsulosin, respectively. The model estimates a medical treatment success rate (no TURP) at 3 years of 72.3% for tamsulosin, compared with 68.2% for both terazosin and doxazosin. The incremental cost for tamsulosin versus terazosin is $610 over 3 years, which yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $14,609 per success. Generic doxazosin is dominated (higher cost but equal effectiveness compared with terazosin). Higher rates of twice daily (or 2 units per day) dosing are associated with higher incremental cost effectiveness ratios. The decision-model results also are sensitive to the estimated costs of TURP and hypotensive adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: As an initial medical therapy for moderate BPH, tamsulosin is more effective than generic terazosin or doxazosin, with an incremental cost of about $203 per year (or about $17 per month) over 3 years. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2004-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10437807/ /pubmed/15369424 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2004.10.5.412 Text en Copyright © 2004, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Formulary Management
Ohsfeldt, Robert L.
Kreder, Karl J.
Klein, Robert W.
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
title Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Tamsulosin, Doxazosin, and Terazosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
title_sort cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin, doxazosin, and terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
topic Formulary Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15369424
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2004.10.5.412
work_keys_str_mv AT ohsfeldtrobertl costeffectivenessoftamsulosindoxazosinandterazosininthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT krederkarlj costeffectivenessoftamsulosindoxazosinandterazosininthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT kleinrobertw costeffectivenessoftamsulosindoxazosinandterazosininthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT chrischilleselizabetha costeffectivenessoftamsulosindoxazosinandterazosininthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia