Cargando…

Evaluation of potential rabies exposure among Japanese international travelers: A retrospective descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Although Japan has been a rabies-free country for >50 years, a few cases have been reported among people traveling abroad. This study aimed to investigate animal exposure among Japanese travelers using the Japanese Registry for Infectious Diseases from Abroad (J-RIDA). METHOD: In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nomoto, Hidetoshi, Yamamoto, Kei, Kutsuna, Satoshi, Asai, Yusuke, Kasamatsu, Yu, Shirano, Michinori, Sahara, Toshinori, Nakamura, Fukumi, Katsuragi, Yukiko, Yamato, Masaya, Shinohara, Koh, Sakamoto, Naoya, Hase, Ryota, Ogawa, Taku, Nagasaka, Atsushi, Miyata, Nobuyuki, Ohmagari, Norio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37595010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287838
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Although Japan has been a rabies-free country for >50 years, a few cases have been reported among people traveling abroad. This study aimed to investigate animal exposure among Japanese travelers using the Japanese Registry for Infectious Diseases from Abroad (J-RIDA). METHOD: In this retrospective analysis, we examined Japanese overseas travelers with animal exposure, as included the J-RIDA database, reported from October 1, 2017, to October 31, 2019, with a focus on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administration and the animals to which the patients were exposed. RESULTS: Among the 322 cases included in the analysis, 19 (5.9%) patients received PrEP and 303 did not. The most common purpose of travel was a non-package tour (n = 175, 54.3%). Most trips (n = 213, 66.1%) were to a single country for <2 weeks. Most patients (n = 286, 87.9%) traveled to countries with a rabies risk. The majority of patients with and without PrEP were injured in rabies-risk countries [n = 270 (89.1%) for non-PrEP and n = 16 (84.2%) for PrEP]. Animals associated with injuries included dogs (55.0%), cats (25.5%), and monkeys (15.5%). Most patients were classified as World Health Organization Category II/III for contact with suspected rabid animals (39.5% and 44.1% for categories II and III, respectively) and had exposure within 5 days of travel. Southeast Asia (n = 180, 55.9%) was the most common region in which travelers were exposed to animals. CONCLUSIONS: Japanese overseas travelers had contact with animals that could possibly transmit the rabies virus, even on short trips. Promoting pre-travel consultation and increasing awareness of the potential for rabies exposure are important for prevention of rabies among Japanese international travelers.