Cargando…

Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra- and inter-device repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different devices in patients prior to corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: We examined preoperative measurements from a total of 204 eyes (102 patients) scheduled for corneal refractive surgery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saad, Amr, Steinberg, Johannes, Frings, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290417
_version_ 1785092632175706112
author Saad, Amr
Steinberg, Johannes
Frings, Andreas
author_facet Saad, Amr
Steinberg, Johannes
Frings, Andreas
author_sort Saad, Amr
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra- and inter-device repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different devices in patients prior to corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: We examined preoperative measurements from a total of 204 eyes (102 patients) scheduled for corneal refractive surgery at two private centers between July and December 2021. Three consecutive scans were performed with three different devices (Sirius anterior segment analyzer, Pentacam HR, IOLMaster 500) in the same session by the same examiner under standardized conditions. To assess the intra- and inter-device repeatability, we calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and demonstrated results using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The measurement accuracy (intra-device repeatability) of Sirius and IOLMaster was comparable (ICC = 0.64 and 0.61, respectively), with almost no statistically significant differences. Sirius showed the highest measurement accuracy among the three devices. Pentacam measurements resulted in lower precision, with an ICC of 0.09. The agreement between the pairs of devices (inter-device repeatability) was low (wide LoA ranges, Table 5). CONCLUSION: In this study, the intra-device repeatability of Sirius and IOLMaster was higher than that of the Pentacam, although it did not achieve an optimal level across all three devices. The three devices examined cannot be used interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10437858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104378582023-08-19 Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices Saad, Amr Steinberg, Johannes Frings, Andreas PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra- and inter-device repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different devices in patients prior to corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: We examined preoperative measurements from a total of 204 eyes (102 patients) scheduled for corneal refractive surgery at two private centers between July and December 2021. Three consecutive scans were performed with three different devices (Sirius anterior segment analyzer, Pentacam HR, IOLMaster 500) in the same session by the same examiner under standardized conditions. To assess the intra- and inter-device repeatability, we calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and demonstrated results using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The measurement accuracy (intra-device repeatability) of Sirius and IOLMaster was comparable (ICC = 0.64 and 0.61, respectively), with almost no statistically significant differences. Sirius showed the highest measurement accuracy among the three devices. Pentacam measurements resulted in lower precision, with an ICC of 0.09. The agreement between the pairs of devices (inter-device repeatability) was low (wide LoA ranges, Table 5). CONCLUSION: In this study, the intra-device repeatability of Sirius and IOLMaster was higher than that of the Pentacam, although it did not achieve an optimal level across all three devices. The three devices examined cannot be used interchangeably. Public Library of Science 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10437858/ /pubmed/37594948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290417 Text en © 2023 Saad et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saad, Amr
Steinberg, Johannes
Frings, Andreas
Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
title Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
title_full Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
title_fullStr Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
title_short Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
title_sort repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290417
work_keys_str_mv AT saadamr repeatabilityofpupildiametermeasurementsusingthreedifferenttopographydevices
AT steinbergjohannes repeatabilityofpupildiametermeasurementsusingthreedifferenttopographydevices
AT fringsandreas repeatabilityofpupildiametermeasurementsusingthreedifferenttopographydevices