Cargando…
Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices
BACKGROUND: Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) significantly decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), a common complication of myelo suppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg), introduced in 2002, has a sustained duration of action, with a single dose comparable in efficacy to daily injecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17506600 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.4.337 |
_version_ | 1785092636084797440 |
---|---|
author | Morrison, Vicki A. Wong, Mitchell Hershman, Dawn Campos, Luis T. Ding, Beiying Malin, Jennifer |
author_facet | Morrison, Vicki A. Wong, Mitchell Hershman, Dawn Campos, Luis T. Ding, Beiying Malin, Jennifer |
author_sort | Morrison, Vicki A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) significantly decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), a common complication of myelo suppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg), introduced in 2002, has a sustained duration of action, with a single dose comparable in efficacy to daily injectionsof filgrastim (5 μg per kg per day) for 10 to 11 days; both agents should be initiated 24 hours after completing chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe the use of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in oncology practices throughout the United States and (2) compare their effectiveness in actual practice as measured by the outcome of febrile neutropenia in patients who received chemotherapy regimens administered every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian, colon cancer, or lymphoma and who received a CSF prior to developing FN. METHODS: Data were retrospectively obtained from the medical records of a cohort of adult patients aged 18 years or older treated in 99 community oncology practices in the United States in 2001 and 2003. Eligible patients were treated with chemotherapy every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian,colon cancer, or lymphoma and were users of filgrastim in 2001 (prior to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of pegfilgrastim in January 2002)or users of either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim or both CSF agents in 2003. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim was initiated, on average, 2.4 days (SD ±3.2) after chemotherapy in the first cycle of use and 1.9 (±3.0) days in subsequent cycles of use. In contrast, filgrastim was started on average 7.7 (±6.5) days and 4.9 (±4.6) days after chemotherapy in the first and subsequent cycles of use in 2001, increasing to 9.6 (±6.2) and 6.4 (±6.4) days in 2003. In the first cycle of CSF use, filgrastim was administered for an average of 5.2 (±3.5)days to 583 patients in 2001 and 3.7 (±2.8) days to 868 patients in 2003(P less than 0.001). Among patients who received more than 1 cycle of filgrastim (n=457 in 2001 and n=489 in 2003; 78.4% and 56.3% of filgrastim users,respectively), the mean days of filgrastim administered in subsequent cycles was 6.0 (±3.5) in 2001 and 4.6 (±3.2) in 2003. Pegfilgrastim was administered as a single dose per chemotherapy course to 1,412 patients in 2003. Patients who received pegfilgrastim were more likely to have at least 1 myelo suppressive drug (74.8%) in the regimen compared with patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (70.0%, P=0.013), but a greater proportion of filgrastim patients in 2003 (19.4%) had advanced-stage diseasecompared with pegfilgrastim patients (14.8%, P=0.005). More patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (36.2%) had a cancer other than breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma compared with those who received pegfilgrastim (29.5%, P=0.001). A total of 94 of 1,451 patients (6.5%) who received filgrastim experienced FN compared with 67 of 1,412 patients(4.7%) for pegfilgrastim. The odds ratio of developing FN among patients who received filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim was 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.96; P=0.040) after adjusting for patient and chemotherapy regimen characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of patients treated in 99 communityoncology practices, patients who received filgrastim often initiated treatment later than recommended and received fewer days per cycle than demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials. Pegfilgrastim was generally initiated earlier within the course of chemotherapy compared with filgrastim, and because of its sustained duration of action, only a single injection was required. In these patients treated with a heterogeneous group of chemotherapy regimens with a broad range of risk of FN, overall,an absolute 1.8% increase in the incidence of developing FN was observed in patients who received filgrastim compared with patients who received pegfilgrastim, (absolute rates of 6.5% and 4.7%, respectively). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10437874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104378742023-08-21 Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices Morrison, Vicki A. Wong, Mitchell Hershman, Dawn Campos, Luis T. Ding, Beiying Malin, Jennifer J Manag Care Pharm Formulary Management BACKGROUND: Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) significantly decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), a common complication of myelo suppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg), introduced in 2002, has a sustained duration of action, with a single dose comparable in efficacy to daily injectionsof filgrastim (5 μg per kg per day) for 10 to 11 days; both agents should be initiated 24 hours after completing chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe the use of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in oncology practices throughout the United States and (2) compare their effectiveness in actual practice as measured by the outcome of febrile neutropenia in patients who received chemotherapy regimens administered every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian, colon cancer, or lymphoma and who received a CSF prior to developing FN. METHODS: Data were retrospectively obtained from the medical records of a cohort of adult patients aged 18 years or older treated in 99 community oncology practices in the United States in 2001 and 2003. Eligible patients were treated with chemotherapy every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian,colon cancer, or lymphoma and were users of filgrastim in 2001 (prior to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of pegfilgrastim in January 2002)or users of either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim or both CSF agents in 2003. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim was initiated, on average, 2.4 days (SD ±3.2) after chemotherapy in the first cycle of use and 1.9 (±3.0) days in subsequent cycles of use. In contrast, filgrastim was started on average 7.7 (±6.5) days and 4.9 (±4.6) days after chemotherapy in the first and subsequent cycles of use in 2001, increasing to 9.6 (±6.2) and 6.4 (±6.4) days in 2003. In the first cycle of CSF use, filgrastim was administered for an average of 5.2 (±3.5)days to 583 patients in 2001 and 3.7 (±2.8) days to 868 patients in 2003(P less than 0.001). Among patients who received more than 1 cycle of filgrastim (n=457 in 2001 and n=489 in 2003; 78.4% and 56.3% of filgrastim users,respectively), the mean days of filgrastim administered in subsequent cycles was 6.0 (±3.5) in 2001 and 4.6 (±3.2) in 2003. Pegfilgrastim was administered as a single dose per chemotherapy course to 1,412 patients in 2003. Patients who received pegfilgrastim were more likely to have at least 1 myelo suppressive drug (74.8%) in the regimen compared with patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (70.0%, P=0.013), but a greater proportion of filgrastim patients in 2003 (19.4%) had advanced-stage diseasecompared with pegfilgrastim patients (14.8%, P=0.005). More patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (36.2%) had a cancer other than breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma compared with those who received pegfilgrastim (29.5%, P=0.001). A total of 94 of 1,451 patients (6.5%) who received filgrastim experienced FN compared with 67 of 1,412 patients(4.7%) for pegfilgrastim. The odds ratio of developing FN among patients who received filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim was 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.96; P=0.040) after adjusting for patient and chemotherapy regimen characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of patients treated in 99 communityoncology practices, patients who received filgrastim often initiated treatment later than recommended and received fewer days per cycle than demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials. Pegfilgrastim was generally initiated earlier within the course of chemotherapy compared with filgrastim, and because of its sustained duration of action, only a single injection was required. In these patients treated with a heterogeneous group of chemotherapy regimens with a broad range of risk of FN, overall,an absolute 1.8% increase in the incidence of developing FN was observed in patients who received filgrastim compared with patients who received pegfilgrastim, (absolute rates of 6.5% and 4.7%, respectively). Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2007-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10437874/ /pubmed/17506600 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.4.337 Text en Copyright © 2007, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Formulary Management Morrison, Vicki A. Wong, Mitchell Hershman, Dawn Campos, Luis T. Ding, Beiying Malin, Jennifer Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices |
title | Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices |
title_full | Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices |
title_fullStr | Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices |
title_short | Observational Study of the Prevalence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Who Received Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Associated With 3-4 Week Chemotherapy Regimens in Community Oncology Practices |
title_sort | observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices |
topic | Formulary Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17506600 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.4.337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisonvickia observationalstudyoftheprevalenceoffebrileneutropeniainpatientswhoreceivedfilgrastimorpegfilgrastimassociatedwith34weekchemotherapyregimensincommunityoncologypractices AT wongmitchell observationalstudyoftheprevalenceoffebrileneutropeniainpatientswhoreceivedfilgrastimorpegfilgrastimassociatedwith34weekchemotherapyregimensincommunityoncologypractices AT hershmandawn observationalstudyoftheprevalenceoffebrileneutropeniainpatientswhoreceivedfilgrastimorpegfilgrastimassociatedwith34weekchemotherapyregimensincommunityoncologypractices AT camposluist observationalstudyoftheprevalenceoffebrileneutropeniainpatientswhoreceivedfilgrastimorpegfilgrastimassociatedwith34weekchemotherapyregimensincommunityoncologypractices AT dingbeiying observationalstudyoftheprevalenceoffebrileneutropeniainpatientswhoreceivedfilgrastimorpegfilgrastimassociatedwith34weekchemotherapyregimensincommunityoncologypractices AT malinjennifer observationalstudyoftheprevalenceoffebrileneutropeniainpatientswhoreceivedfilgrastimorpegfilgrastimassociatedwith34weekchemotherapyregimensincommunityoncologypractices |