Cargando…
Why Hypotheses Informed by Observation Are Often Wrong: Results of Randomized Controlled Trials Challenge Chronic Disease Management Strategies Based on Epidemiological Evidence
Autor principal: | Fairman, Kathleen A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21434699 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.3.224 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Still Looking for Health Outcomes in All the Wrong Places? Misinterpreted Observational Evidence, Medication Adherence Promotion, and Value-Based Insurance Design
por: Fairman, Kathleen A., et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
The NFL draft: how "the experts" get it wrong more often than not, expensively
por: Berri, David J, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Why is research fraud wrong?
por: Fraser, SG
Publicado: (2013) -
Why Girls Go Wrong
Publicado: (1913) -
The importance of considering regulatory domains in genome-wide analyses – the nearest gene is often wrong!
por: Chua, Ellora Hui Zhen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)