Cargando…

Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?

BACKGROUND: The overall health care costs for managing patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in U.S. hospitals is burdensome.While pharmacy costs comprise only a minor proportion of these costs,hospital length of stay (LOS) is the greatest contributor. Infections due to antimicrobial-resi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nicolau, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2009
Materias:
Cea
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19236136
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.12
_version_ 1785092729811763200
author Nicolau, David P.
author_facet Nicolau, David P.
author_sort Nicolau, David P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The overall health care costs for managing patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in U.S. hospitals is burdensome.While pharmacy costs comprise only a minor proportion of these costs,hospital length of stay (LOS) is the greatest contributor. Infections due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are also associated with increased overall health care cost. Therefore, strategies that aim to minimize antimicrobial resistance and reduce hospital LOS may have the greatest impact in reducing overall health care costs in managing patients with CAP. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how antimicrobial resistance can impact healthcare costs associated with CAP and review strategies to minimize the risk of resistance development while promoting appropriate antimicrobial therapy (including optimized dosing) and decreasing hospital LOS. SUMMARY: Antimicrobial resistance can increase the risk of clinical failure and result in higher overall health care costs. Further development of antimicrobial resistance during therapy should, therefore, be minimized.This can be achieved through optimized antimicrobial dosing strategies—using a higher dose of concentration-dependent agents or prolonged infusion of time-dependent agents—that increase the probability of attaining pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets for eradication of the pathogen and hence successful clinical outcomes. Decreasing LOS must be a priority when attempting to reduce hospital costs. Active intravenous-to-oral switch therapy has been shown to effectively reduce LOS. Appropriate short-course regimens may also offer the opportunity for effective treatment while reducing or eliminating unnecessary antimicrobial exposure that not only reduces the potential for drug-related adverse events, but may also minimize the selection of resistant organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical failure and antimicrobial resistance can significantly increase the cost of managing patients with CAP, primarily by increasingLOS. Therefore, strategies should be employed to minimize the risk of resistance development and reduce LOS. These include early appropriate therapy, optimized dosing based on pharmacodynamic principles, and efficient IV-to-PO switch therapy when appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10438171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104381712023-08-21 Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive? Nicolau, David P. J Manag Care Pharm Cea BACKGROUND: The overall health care costs for managing patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in U.S. hospitals is burdensome.While pharmacy costs comprise only a minor proportion of these costs,hospital length of stay (LOS) is the greatest contributor. Infections due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are also associated with increased overall health care cost. Therefore, strategies that aim to minimize antimicrobial resistance and reduce hospital LOS may have the greatest impact in reducing overall health care costs in managing patients with CAP. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how antimicrobial resistance can impact healthcare costs associated with CAP and review strategies to minimize the risk of resistance development while promoting appropriate antimicrobial therapy (including optimized dosing) and decreasing hospital LOS. SUMMARY: Antimicrobial resistance can increase the risk of clinical failure and result in higher overall health care costs. Further development of antimicrobial resistance during therapy should, therefore, be minimized.This can be achieved through optimized antimicrobial dosing strategies—using a higher dose of concentration-dependent agents or prolonged infusion of time-dependent agents—that increase the probability of attaining pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets for eradication of the pathogen and hence successful clinical outcomes. Decreasing LOS must be a priority when attempting to reduce hospital costs. Active intravenous-to-oral switch therapy has been shown to effectively reduce LOS. Appropriate short-course regimens may also offer the opportunity for effective treatment while reducing or eliminating unnecessary antimicrobial exposure that not only reduces the potential for drug-related adverse events, but may also minimize the selection of resistant organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical failure and antimicrobial resistance can significantly increase the cost of managing patients with CAP, primarily by increasingLOS. Therefore, strategies should be employed to minimize the risk of resistance development and reduce LOS. These include early appropriate therapy, optimized dosing based on pharmacodynamic principles, and efficient IV-to-PO switch therapy when appropriate. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2009-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10438171/ /pubmed/19236136 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.12 Text en Copyright © 2009, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cea
Nicolau, David P.
Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
title Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
title_full Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
title_fullStr Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
title_full_unstemmed Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
title_short Containing Costs and Containing Bugs: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
title_sort containing costs and containing bugs: are they mutually exclusive?
topic Cea
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19236136
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.12
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaudavidp containingcostsandcontainingbugsaretheymutuallyexclusive