Cargando…

Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease

BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown a decrease in medication adherence as dosing frequency increases; however, meta-analyses have not been able to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between dosing frequency and adherence when comparing twice-daily versus once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVES: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleman, Craig I., Limone, Brendan, Sobieraj, Diana M., Lee, Soyon, Roberts, Matthew S., Kaur, Rajbir, Alam, Tawfikul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22971206
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527
_version_ 1785092738433155072
author Coleman, Craig I.
Limone, Brendan
Sobieraj, Diana M.
Lee, Soyon
Roberts, Matthew S.
Kaur, Rajbir
Alam, Tawfikul
author_facet Coleman, Craig I.
Limone, Brendan
Sobieraj, Diana M.
Lee, Soyon
Roberts, Matthew S.
Kaur, Rajbir
Alam, Tawfikul
author_sort Coleman, Craig I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown a decrease in medication adherence as dosing frequency increases; however, meta-analyses have not been able to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between dosing frequency and adherence when comparing twice-daily versus once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of scheduled dosing frequency on medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline and Embase from January 1986 to December 2011 and a hand search of references were performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies were included if they utilized a prospective design, assessed adult patients with chronic diseases, evaluated scheduled oral medications taken 1 to 4 times daily, and measured medication adherence for at least 1 month using an electronic monitoring device. Manual searches of reference sections of identified studies and systematic reviews were also performed to find other potentially relevant articles. Standard definitions for medication taking, regimen, and timing adherence were used and evaluated. Studies were pooled using a multivariate linear mixed-model method to conduct meta-regression accounting for both random and fixed effects, weighted 
by the inverse of the variance of medication adherence. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies, comprising 65, 76, and 47 dosing frequency arms for the taking, regimen, and timing adherence endpoints were included. Unadjusted adherence estimates were highest when the least stringent definition, taking adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 80.1%-93.0%) and lowest when the most stringent definition, timing adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 18.8%-76.9%). In multivariate meta-regression analyses, the adjusted weighted mean percentage adherence rates for all regimens dosed more frequently than once per day were significantly lower compared with once-daily regimens (for 2-times, 3-times, and 4-times daily regimens, respectively: differences for taking adherence: –6.7%, –13.5%, and –19.2%; regimen adherence: –13.1%, –24.9%, and –23.1%; and timing adherence: –26.7%, –39.0%, and –54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic diseases appear to be more adherent with once-daily compared with more frequently scheduled medication regimens. The use of more stringent definitions of adherence magnified these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10438207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104382072023-08-21 Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease Coleman, Craig I. Limone, Brendan Sobieraj, Diana M. Lee, Soyon Roberts, Matthew S. Kaur, Rajbir Alam, Tawfikul J Manag Care Pharm Review BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown a decrease in medication adherence as dosing frequency increases; however, meta-analyses have not been able to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between dosing frequency and adherence when comparing twice-daily versus once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of scheduled dosing frequency on medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline and Embase from January 1986 to December 2011 and a hand search of references were performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies were included if they utilized a prospective design, assessed adult patients with chronic diseases, evaluated scheduled oral medications taken 1 to 4 times daily, and measured medication adherence for at least 1 month using an electronic monitoring device. Manual searches of reference sections of identified studies and systematic reviews were also performed to find other potentially relevant articles. Standard definitions for medication taking, regimen, and timing adherence were used and evaluated. Studies were pooled using a multivariate linear mixed-model method to conduct meta-regression accounting for both random and fixed effects, weighted 
by the inverse of the variance of medication adherence. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies, comprising 65, 76, and 47 dosing frequency arms for the taking, regimen, and timing adherence endpoints were included. Unadjusted adherence estimates were highest when the least stringent definition, taking adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 80.1%-93.0%) and lowest when the most stringent definition, timing adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 18.8%-76.9%). In multivariate meta-regression analyses, the adjusted weighted mean percentage adherence rates for all regimens dosed more frequently than once per day were significantly lower compared with once-daily regimens (for 2-times, 3-times, and 4-times daily regimens, respectively: differences for taking adherence: –6.7%, –13.5%, and –19.2%; regimen adherence: –13.1%, –24.9%, and –23.1%; and timing adherence: –26.7%, –39.0%, and –54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic diseases appear to be more adherent with once-daily compared with more frequently scheduled medication regimens. The use of more stringent definitions of adherence magnified these findings. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10438207/ /pubmed/22971206 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527 Text en Copyright © 2012, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Coleman, Craig I.
Limone, Brendan
Sobieraj, Diana M.
Lee, Soyon
Roberts, Matthew S.
Kaur, Rajbir
Alam, Tawfikul
Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
title Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
title_full Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
title_fullStr Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
title_full_unstemmed Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
title_short Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
title_sort dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22971206
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527
work_keys_str_mv AT colemancraigi dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease
AT limonebrendan dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease
AT sobierajdianam dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease
AT leesoyon dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease
AT robertsmatthews dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease
AT kaurrajbir dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease
AT alamtawfikul dosingfrequencyandmedicationadherenceinchronicdisease