Cargando…
Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 antiemetic agents, ondansetron and prochlorperazine, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis model was...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871642 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.4.317 |
_version_ | 1785092757426012160 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Peter |
author_facet | Chang, Peter |
author_sort | Chang, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 antiemetic agents, ondansetron and prochlorperazine, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis model was applied to data derived from a previous clinical study conducted in 1995 and 1996. This study involved 78 adult patients (62.8% female and 37.2% male) undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. Patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind manner to receive either ondansetron 4 mg intravenously (n=37) or prochlorperazine 10 mg intramuscularly (n=41) immediately upon completion of surgery and were monitored for occurrences of PONV during the subsequent 48 hours. In our analysis, we measured the cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E ratio), defined as the cost per successfully treated patient, for each antiemetic agent using the clinical data obtained from the previous study. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV and use of rescue antiemetics was significantly greater in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group. The mean total costs of PONV management per patient in the prochlorperazine and ondansetron groups were $13.99 and $51.98, respectively (based on 2004 average wholesale prices [AWP]). The cost of successfully treating one patient with prochlorperazine and ondansetron was $31.87 and $275.01, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed adjusting the percent efficacy rate of each antiemetic and the drug cost of ondansetron (up to a 50% reduction in AWP). Prochlorperazine remained the dominant strategy across each scenario. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that prochlorperazine is a more cost-effective antiemetic compared with ondansetron for the prevention of PONV in a mixed gender, adult inpatient population undergoing total joint arthroplasty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10438286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104382862023-08-21 Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting Chang, Peter J Manag Care Pharm Formulary Management OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 antiemetic agents, ondansetron and prochlorperazine, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis model was applied to data derived from a previous clinical study conducted in 1995 and 1996. This study involved 78 adult patients (62.8% female and 37.2% male) undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. Patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind manner to receive either ondansetron 4 mg intravenously (n=37) or prochlorperazine 10 mg intramuscularly (n=41) immediately upon completion of surgery and were monitored for occurrences of PONV during the subsequent 48 hours. In our analysis, we measured the cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E ratio), defined as the cost per successfully treated patient, for each antiemetic agent using the clinical data obtained from the previous study. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV and use of rescue antiemetics was significantly greater in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group. The mean total costs of PONV management per patient in the prochlorperazine and ondansetron groups were $13.99 and $51.98, respectively (based on 2004 average wholesale prices [AWP]). The cost of successfully treating one patient with prochlorperazine and ondansetron was $31.87 and $275.01, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed adjusting the percent efficacy rate of each antiemetic and the drug cost of ondansetron (up to a 50% reduction in AWP). Prochlorperazine remained the dominant strategy across each scenario. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that prochlorperazine is a more cost-effective antiemetic compared with ondansetron for the prevention of PONV in a mixed gender, adult inpatient population undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2005-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10438286/ /pubmed/15871642 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.4.317 Text en Copyright © 2005, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Formulary Management Chang, Peter Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting |
title | Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting |
title_full | Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting |
title_fullStr | Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting |
title_short | Cost-EffectivenessAnalysis of Ondansetron and Prochlorperazine for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea andVomiting |
title_sort | cost-effectivenessanalysis of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of postoperative nausea andvomiting |
topic | Formulary Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871642 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.4.317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changpeter costeffectivenessanalysisofondansetronandprochlorperazineforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomiting |