Cargando…

The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can be a powerful analytic tool for assessing the value of health care interventions when used in conjunction with efficacy, safety, and other supporting data in an evidence-based decision making environment. CEA is commonly defined in terms of the comparison of cos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bell, Christopher F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21787032
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.6.463
_version_ 1785092758953787392
author Bell, Christopher F.
author_facet Bell, Christopher F.
author_sort Bell, Christopher F.
collection PubMed
description Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can be a powerful analytic tool for assessing the value of health care interventions when used in conjunction with efficacy, safety, and other supporting data in an evidence-based decision making environment. CEA is commonly defined in terms of the comparison of costs, expressed in monetary units, with outcomes that may be expressed in a variety of ways. One of the most common forms of CEA compares costs in monetary units with outcomes quantified in nonmonetary units (e.g., cancer avoided, death avoided, or successfully treated patient). Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of CEA that compares costs in monetary units with outcomes quantified as a multidimensional measure of effectiveness (e.g., utilities that are used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). Cost benefit analysis (CBA), another form of CEA that is used less frequently, compares costs and benefits (i.e., outcomes) both of which are quantified in monetary units. Overall, there has been an increasing trend in the use of CEA (CEA, CUA, and CBA) to inform decision making. This trend can be implicitly measured by the frequency of published CEAs over time. Using the…
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10438292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104382922023-08-21 The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Bell, Christopher F. J Manag Care Pharm Commentary Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can be a powerful analytic tool for assessing the value of health care interventions when used in conjunction with efficacy, safety, and other supporting data in an evidence-based decision making environment. CEA is commonly defined in terms of the comparison of costs, expressed in monetary units, with outcomes that may be expressed in a variety of ways. One of the most common forms of CEA compares costs in monetary units with outcomes quantified in nonmonetary units (e.g., cancer avoided, death avoided, or successfully treated patient). Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of CEA that compares costs in monetary units with outcomes quantified as a multidimensional measure of effectiveness (e.g., utilities that are used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). Cost benefit analysis (CBA), another form of CEA that is used less frequently, compares costs and benefits (i.e., outcomes) both of which are quantified in monetary units. Overall, there has been an increasing trend in the use of CEA (CEA, CUA, and CBA) to inform decision making. This trend can be implicitly measured by the frequency of published CEAs over time. Using the… Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10438292/ /pubmed/21787032 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.6.463 Text en Copyright © 2011, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Bell, Christopher F.
The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
title The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
title_full The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
title_short The Pursuit of Transparency and Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – A Case Study in Disease-Modifying Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort pursuit of transparency and quality improvement in cost-effectiveness analysis – a case study in disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21787032
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.6.463
work_keys_str_mv AT bellchristopherf thepursuitoftransparencyandqualityimprovementincosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudyindiseasemodifyingdrugsforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis
AT bellchristopherf pursuitoftransparencyandqualityimprovementincosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudyindiseasemodifyingdrugsforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis