Cargando…

Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis

Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richards, Colleen, Sarkar, Sumona, Kandell, Jennifer, Snyder, Richard, Lakshmipathy, Uma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600315
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227
_version_ 1785092831429263360
author Richards, Colleen
Sarkar, Sumona
Kandell, Jennifer
Snyder, Richard
Lakshmipathy, Uma
author_facet Richards, Colleen
Sarkar, Sumona
Kandell, Jennifer
Snyder, Richard
Lakshmipathy, Uma
author_sort Richards, Colleen
collection PubMed
description Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for each potential application. This is further amplified by user subjectivity in identifying the cells of interest and further identifying viable cells. Replacement of traditionally used manual counting methods with automated systems has alleviated some of these issues. However, a single cell type can exhibit different physical properties at various stages of cell processing which is further compounded by process impurities such as cell debris or magnetic beads. These factors make it challenging to develop a robust cell counting method that offers a high level of confidence in the results. Several initiatives from standards development organizations have attempted to address this critical need for standardization in cell counting. This study utilizes flow-based and image-based methods for the quantitative measurement of cell concentration and viability in the absence of a reference material, based on the tools and guidance provided by the International of Standards (ISO) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Primary cells were examined at different stages of cell processing in a cell therapy workflow. Results from this study define a systematic approach that enables the identification of counting methods and parameters that are best suited for specific cell types and workflows to ensure accuracy and consistency. Cell counting is a foundational method used extensively along various steps of cell and gene therapy. The standard used in this study may be applied to other cell and gene therapy processes to enable accurate measurement of parameters required to guide critical decisions throughout the development and production process. Using a framework that confirms the suitability of the cell counting method used can minimize variability in the process and final product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10438949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104389492023-08-19 Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis Richards, Colleen Sarkar, Sumona Kandell, Jennifer Snyder, Richard Lakshmipathy, Uma Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Cell counting is a fundamental measurement for determining viable cell numbers in biomanufacturing processes. The properties of different cell types and the range of intended uses for cell counts within a biomanufacturing process can lead to challenges in identifying suitable counting methods for each potential application. This is further amplified by user subjectivity in identifying the cells of interest and further identifying viable cells. Replacement of traditionally used manual counting methods with automated systems has alleviated some of these issues. However, a single cell type can exhibit different physical properties at various stages of cell processing which is further compounded by process impurities such as cell debris or magnetic beads. These factors make it challenging to develop a robust cell counting method that offers a high level of confidence in the results. Several initiatives from standards development organizations have attempted to address this critical need for standardization in cell counting. This study utilizes flow-based and image-based methods for the quantitative measurement of cell concentration and viability in the absence of a reference material, based on the tools and guidance provided by the International of Standards (ISO) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Primary cells were examined at different stages of cell processing in a cell therapy workflow. Results from this study define a systematic approach that enables the identification of counting methods and parameters that are best suited for specific cell types and workflows to ensure accuracy and consistency. Cell counting is a foundational method used extensively along various steps of cell and gene therapy. The standard used in this study may be applied to other cell and gene therapy processes to enable accurate measurement of parameters required to guide critical decisions throughout the development and production process. Using a framework that confirms the suitability of the cell counting method used can minimize variability in the process and final product. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10438949/ /pubmed/37600315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227 Text en Copyright © 2023 Richards, Sarkar, Kandell, Snyder and Lakshmipathy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Richards, Colleen
Sarkar, Sumona
Kandell, Jennifer
Snyder, Richard
Lakshmipathy, Uma
Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
title Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
title_full Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
title_fullStr Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
title_short Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
title_sort assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an iso 20391-2 guided study design and analysis
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600315
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223227
work_keys_str_mv AT richardscolleen assessingthesuitabilityofcellcountingmethodsduringdifferentstagesofacellprocessingworkflowusinganiso203912guidedstudydesignandanalysis
AT sarkarsumona assessingthesuitabilityofcellcountingmethodsduringdifferentstagesofacellprocessingworkflowusinganiso203912guidedstudydesignandanalysis
AT kandelljennifer assessingthesuitabilityofcellcountingmethodsduringdifferentstagesofacellprocessingworkflowusinganiso203912guidedstudydesignandanalysis
AT snyderrichard assessingthesuitabilityofcellcountingmethodsduringdifferentstagesofacellprocessingworkflowusinganiso203912guidedstudydesignandanalysis
AT lakshmipathyuma assessingthesuitabilityofcellcountingmethodsduringdifferentstagesofacellprocessingworkflowusinganiso203912guidedstudydesignandanalysis