Cargando…
Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37595595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772179 |
_version_ | 1785092835442163712 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Maestá, Izildinha Costa, Roberto Antonio de Araújo Campos, Aline de Ávila Braga, Antonio Horowitz, Neil Elias, Kevin M. Berkowitz, Ross |
author_facet | Silva, Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Maestá, Izildinha Costa, Roberto Antonio de Araújo Campos, Aline de Ávila Braga, Antonio Horowitz, Neil Elias, Kevin M. Berkowitz, Ross |
author_sort | Silva, Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São Paulo state (I–XVII), Brazil, referred to the Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center (specialized center, district VI), between 1990 and 2018. At admission, hydatidiform mole was assessed according to the risk score system of Berkowitz et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was evaluated using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics / World Health Organization (FIGO/WHO) staging/risk score. Data on demographics, clinical status and distance traveled were collected. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results This study included 366 women (335 hydatidiform mole, 31 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia). The clinical status at admission and distance traveled significantly differed between the specialized center district and other districts. Patients referred from health districts IX (β = 2.38 [0.87–3.88], p = 0.002) and XVI (β = 0.78 [0.02–1.55], p = 0.045) had higher hydatidiform mole scores than those from the specialized center district. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients from district XVI showed a 3.32 increase in FIGO risk scores compared with those from the specialized center area (β = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.78–5.87, p = 0.010). Distance traveled by patients from districts IX (200km) and XVI (203.5km) was significantly longer than that traveled by patients from the specialized center district (76km). Conclusion Patients from health districts outside the specialized center area had higher risk scores for both hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at admission. Long distances (>80 km) seemed to adversely influence gestational trophoblastic disease clinical status at admission, indicating barriers to accessing specialized centers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10438964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104389642023-08-19 Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Silva, Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Maestá, Izildinha Costa, Roberto Antonio de Araújo Campos, Aline de Ávila Braga, Antonio Horowitz, Neil Elias, Kevin M. Berkowitz, Ross Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São Paulo state (I–XVII), Brazil, referred to the Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center (specialized center, district VI), between 1990 and 2018. At admission, hydatidiform mole was assessed according to the risk score system of Berkowitz et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was evaluated using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics / World Health Organization (FIGO/WHO) staging/risk score. Data on demographics, clinical status and distance traveled were collected. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results This study included 366 women (335 hydatidiform mole, 31 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia). The clinical status at admission and distance traveled significantly differed between the specialized center district and other districts. Patients referred from health districts IX (β = 2.38 [0.87–3.88], p = 0.002) and XVI (β = 0.78 [0.02–1.55], p = 0.045) had higher hydatidiform mole scores than those from the specialized center district. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients from district XVI showed a 3.32 increase in FIGO risk scores compared with those from the specialized center area (β = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.78–5.87, p = 0.010). Distance traveled by patients from districts IX (200km) and XVI (203.5km) was significantly longer than that traveled by patients from the specialized center district (76km). Conclusion Patients from health districts outside the specialized center area had higher risk scores for both hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at admission. Long distances (>80 km) seemed to adversely influence gestational trophoblastic disease clinical status at admission, indicating barriers to accessing specialized centers. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10438964/ /pubmed/37595595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772179 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Silva, Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Maestá, Izildinha Costa, Roberto Antonio de Araújo Campos, Aline de Ávila Braga, Antonio Horowitz, Neil Elias, Kevin M. Berkowitz, Ross Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_full | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_fullStr | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_short | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_sort | geographical health district and distance traveled influence on clinical status at admission of patients with gestational trophoblastic disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37595595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvavaldeteaparecidaribeiroda geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT maestaizildinha geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT costarobertoantoniodearaujo geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT camposalinedeavila geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT bragaantonio geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT horowitzneil geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT eliaskevinm geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT berkowitzross geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease |