Cargando…
Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models
Studies which provide norms of Likert ratings typically report per-item summary statistics. Traditionally, these summary statistics comprise the mean and the standard deviation (SD) of the ratings, and the number of observations. Such summary statistics can preserve the rank order of items, but prov...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7 |
_version_ | 1785092860488450048 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Jack E. Rousselet, Guillaume A. Scheepers, Christoph Sereno, Sara C. |
author_facet | Taylor, Jack E. Rousselet, Guillaume A. Scheepers, Christoph Sereno, Sara C. |
author_sort | Taylor, Jack E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies which provide norms of Likert ratings typically report per-item summary statistics. Traditionally, these summary statistics comprise the mean and the standard deviation (SD) of the ratings, and the number of observations. Such summary statistics can preserve the rank order of items, but provide distorted estimates of the relative distances between items because of the ordinal nature of Likert ratings. Inter-item relations in such ordinal scales can be more appropriately modelled by cumulative link mixed effects models (CLMMs). In a series of simulations, and with a reanalysis of an existing rating norms dataset, we show that CLMMs can be used to more accurately norm items, and can provide summary statistics analogous to the traditionally reported means and SDs, but which are disentangled from participants’ response biases. CLMMs can be applied to solve important statistical issues that exist for more traditional analyses of rating norms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10439063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104390632023-08-20 Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models Taylor, Jack E. Rousselet, Guillaume A. Scheepers, Christoph Sereno, Sara C. Behav Res Methods Article Studies which provide norms of Likert ratings typically report per-item summary statistics. Traditionally, these summary statistics comprise the mean and the standard deviation (SD) of the ratings, and the number of observations. Such summary statistics can preserve the rank order of items, but provide distorted estimates of the relative distances between items because of the ordinal nature of Likert ratings. Inter-item relations in such ordinal scales can be more appropriately modelled by cumulative link mixed effects models (CLMMs). In a series of simulations, and with a reanalysis of an existing rating norms dataset, we show that CLMMs can be used to more accurately norm items, and can provide summary statistics analogous to the traditionally reported means and SDs, but which are disentangled from participants’ response biases. CLMMs can be applied to solve important statistical issues that exist for more traditional analyses of rating norms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7. Springer US 2022-09-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10439063/ /pubmed/36103049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Taylor, Jack E. Rousselet, Guillaume A. Scheepers, Christoph Sereno, Sara C. Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
title | Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
title_full | Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
title_fullStr | Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
title_full_unstemmed | Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
title_short | Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
title_sort | rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorjacke ratingnormsshouldbecalculatedfromcumulativelinkmixedeffectsmodels AT rousseletguillaumea ratingnormsshouldbecalculatedfromcumulativelinkmixedeffectsmodels AT scheeperschristoph ratingnormsshouldbecalculatedfromcumulativelinkmixedeffectsmodels AT serenosarac ratingnormsshouldbecalculatedfromcumulativelinkmixedeffectsmodels |