Cargando…
Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems
There is an increased interest from transit agencies to replace fixed-route transit services with on-demand public transits (ODT). However, it is still unclear when and where such a service is efficient and sustainable. To this end, we provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the sustainabili...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40639-y |
_version_ | 1785092893936975872 |
---|---|
author | Alsaleh, Nael Farooq, Bilal |
author_facet | Alsaleh, Nael Farooq, Bilal |
author_sort | Alsaleh, Nael |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is an increased interest from transit agencies to replace fixed-route transit services with on-demand public transits (ODT). However, it is still unclear when and where such a service is efficient and sustainable. To this end, we provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the sustainability of ODT systems from the perspective of overall efficiency, environmental footprint, and social equity and inclusion. The proposed framework is illustrated by applying it to the Town of Innisfil, Ontario, where an ODT system has been implemented since 2017. It can be concluded that when there is adequate supply and no surge pricing, crowdsourced ODTs are the most cost-effective transit system when the demand is below 3.37 riders/km(2)/day. With surge pricing applied to crowdsourced ODTs, hybrid systems become the most cost-effective transit solution when demand ranges between 1.18 and 3.37 riders/km(2)/day. The use of private vehicles is more environmentally sustainable than providing public transit service at all demand levels below 3.37 riders/km(2)/day. However, the electrification of the public transit fleet along with optimized charging strategies can reduce total yearly GHG emissions by more than 98%. Furthermore, transit systems have similar equity distributions for waiting and in-vehicle travel times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10439202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104392022023-08-20 Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems Alsaleh, Nael Farooq, Bilal Sci Rep Article There is an increased interest from transit agencies to replace fixed-route transit services with on-demand public transits (ODT). However, it is still unclear when and where such a service is efficient and sustainable. To this end, we provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the sustainability of ODT systems from the perspective of overall efficiency, environmental footprint, and social equity and inclusion. The proposed framework is illustrated by applying it to the Town of Innisfil, Ontario, where an ODT system has been implemented since 2017. It can be concluded that when there is adequate supply and no surge pricing, crowdsourced ODTs are the most cost-effective transit system when the demand is below 3.37 riders/km(2)/day. With surge pricing applied to crowdsourced ODTs, hybrid systems become the most cost-effective transit solution when demand ranges between 1.18 and 3.37 riders/km(2)/day. The use of private vehicles is more environmentally sustainable than providing public transit service at all demand levels below 3.37 riders/km(2)/day. However, the electrification of the public transit fleet along with optimized charging strategies can reduce total yearly GHG emissions by more than 98%. Furthermore, transit systems have similar equity distributions for waiting and in-vehicle travel times. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10439202/ /pubmed/37596316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40639-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Alsaleh, Nael Farooq, Bilal Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
title | Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
title_full | Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
title_fullStr | Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
title_short | Sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
title_sort | sustainability analysis framework for on-demand public transit systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40639-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsalehnael sustainabilityanalysisframeworkforondemandpublictransitsystems AT farooqbilal sustainabilityanalysisframeworkforondemandpublictransitsystems |