Cargando…
Romiplostim in primary immune thrombocytopenia that is persistent or chronic: phase III multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in China
BACKGROUND: Multiple trials have confirmed that romiplostim could increase platelet count in individuals with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but no related study has assessed Chinese patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of romiplostim as a second-line treatment of persistent or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100192 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Multiple trials have confirmed that romiplostim could increase platelet count in individuals with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but no related study has assessed Chinese patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of romiplostim as a second-line treatment of persistent or chronic ITP in Chinese adults. METHODS: This phase III multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, then open-label clinical trial (NCT02868099, CTR20150395) was conducted at 28 investigational sites in China. The patients were randomly assigned (3:1) to romiplostim (starting and maximum doses of 1 and 10 μg/kg, respectively) or placebo for 9 weeks (double-blind period), followed by the open-label period (both groups administered romiplostim) to week 22. The primary endpoint was the time (in weeks) during which platelet counts were ≥50 × 10(9)/L in the double-blind period. RESULTS: In this study, 202 patients (romiplostim, n = 151; placebo, n = 51) started the treatment. The median (range) numbers of weeks with platelet response after 6 weeks of treatment were 2 (0-6) and 0 (0-2) in patients administered romiplostim and placebo, respectively (P < .001). During the double-blind period, the proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between the romiplostim and placebo groups (82.8% vs 82.4%). The treatment-emergent adverse event with ≥10% difference in incidence between these 2 groups was injection site bleeding (1.3% vs 11.8%). CONCLUSION: Romiplostim significantly increased the time with maintained platelet response in patients with persistent or chronic ITP in comparison with placebo. No new safety signal was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02868099. www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlist.dhtml, CTR20150395 |
---|