Cargando…

Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The effect of fecal stream diversion on the gut microbiota is still uncertain. The present study was designed to assess the effect of fecal stream diversion on the composition of the gut microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. We included patients undergoing left-sided colorectal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Soo Young, Park, Hyeung-Min, Kim, Chang Hyun, Kim, Hyeong Rok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00566-9
_version_ 1785092974557790208
author Lee, Soo Young
Park, Hyeung-Min
Kim, Chang Hyun
Kim, Hyeong Rok
author_facet Lee, Soo Young
Park, Hyeung-Min
Kim, Chang Hyun
Kim, Hyeong Rok
author_sort Lee, Soo Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of fecal stream diversion on the gut microbiota is still uncertain. The present study was designed to assess the effect of fecal stream diversion on the composition of the gut microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. We included patients undergoing left-sided colorectal cancer surgery with (ileostomy group) or without (control group) diverting ileostomy. Fecal samples were collected from 10 patients in each group before surgery (t(1)) and after ileostomy repair in the ileostomy group and 6–12 months after the initial surgery in the control group (t(2)). The fecal microbiota was assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing, and changes in the composition of the fecal microbiota were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Alpha diversity analysis revealed that the complexity of fecal microbiota decreased between t(1) and t(2) only in the ileostomy group. Beta diversity analysis also showed dissimilarity between t(1) and t(2) only in the ileostomy group. The composition of the microbiota was similar between the two groups at t(1). However, at t(2), the ileostomy group had lower proportion of beneficial bacteria (Lachnospiraceae, 3.8% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001; Ruminococcaceae, 0.6% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.001; Blautia, 0.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001; Faecalibacterium, 0.2% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of harmful bacteria (Proteobacteria, 17.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.006; Clostridium, 16.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.013; Streptococcus, 17.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.002) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal stream diversion was closely associated with less diversity and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13099-023-00566-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10439566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104395662023-08-20 Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer Lee, Soo Young Park, Hyeung-Min Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Gut Pathog Research BACKGROUND: The effect of fecal stream diversion on the gut microbiota is still uncertain. The present study was designed to assess the effect of fecal stream diversion on the composition of the gut microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. We included patients undergoing left-sided colorectal cancer surgery with (ileostomy group) or without (control group) diverting ileostomy. Fecal samples were collected from 10 patients in each group before surgery (t(1)) and after ileostomy repair in the ileostomy group and 6–12 months after the initial surgery in the control group (t(2)). The fecal microbiota was assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing, and changes in the composition of the fecal microbiota were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Alpha diversity analysis revealed that the complexity of fecal microbiota decreased between t(1) and t(2) only in the ileostomy group. Beta diversity analysis also showed dissimilarity between t(1) and t(2) only in the ileostomy group. The composition of the microbiota was similar between the two groups at t(1). However, at t(2), the ileostomy group had lower proportion of beneficial bacteria (Lachnospiraceae, 3.8% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001; Ruminococcaceae, 0.6% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.001; Blautia, 0.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001; Faecalibacterium, 0.2% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of harmful bacteria (Proteobacteria, 17.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.006; Clostridium, 16.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.013; Streptococcus, 17.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.002) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal stream diversion was closely associated with less diversity and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13099-023-00566-9. BioMed Central 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10439566/ /pubmed/37596621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00566-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Soo Young
Park, Hyeung-Min
Kim, Chang Hyun
Kim, Hyeong Rok
Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
title Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
title_full Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
title_short Dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
title_sort dysbiosis of gut microbiota during fecal stream diversion in patients with colorectal cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37596621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00566-9
work_keys_str_mv AT leesooyoung dysbiosisofgutmicrobiotaduringfecalstreamdiversioninpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT parkhyeungmin dysbiosisofgutmicrobiotaduringfecalstreamdiversioninpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kimchanghyun dysbiosisofgutmicrobiotaduringfecalstreamdiversioninpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT kimhyeongrok dysbiosisofgutmicrobiotaduringfecalstreamdiversioninpatientswithcolorectalcancer