Cargando…
Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions
Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is an important MRI biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in various neurodegenerative and traumatic spinal cord diseases. However, the conventional method of computing CSA based on vertebral levels is inherently flawed, as the prediction of spinal levels fro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37598229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40731-3 |
_version_ | 1785093069906903040 |
---|---|
author | Bédard, Sandrine Bouthillier, Maxime Cohen-Adad, Julien |
author_facet | Bédard, Sandrine Bouthillier, Maxime Cohen-Adad, Julien |
author_sort | Bédard, Sandrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is an important MRI biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in various neurodegenerative and traumatic spinal cord diseases. However, the conventional method of computing CSA based on vertebral levels is inherently flawed, as the prediction of spinal levels from vertebral levels lacks reliability, leading to considerable variability in CSA measurements. Computing CSA from an intrinsic neuroanatomical reference, the pontomedullary junction (PMJ), has been proposed in previous work to overcome limitations associated with using a vertebral reference. However, the validation of this alternative approach, along with its variability across and within participants under variable neck extensions, remains unexplored. The goal of this study was to determine if the variability of CSA across neck flexions/extensions is reduced when using the PMJ, compared to vertebral levels. Ten participants underwent a 3T MRI T2w isotropic scan at 0.6 mm(3) for 3 neck positions: extension, neutral and flexion. Spinal cord segmentation, vertebral labeling, PMJ labeling, and CSA were computed automatically while spinal segments were labeled manually. Mean coefficient of variation for CSA across neck positions was 3.99 ± 2.96% for the PMJ method vs. 4.02 ± 3.01% for manual spinal segment method vs. 4.46 ± 3.10% for the disc method. These differences were not statistically significant. The PMJ method was slightly more reliable than the disc-based method to compute CSA at specific spinal segments, although the difference was not statistically significant. This suggests that the PMJ can serve as a valuable alternative and reliable method for estimating CSA when a disc-based approach is challenging or not feasible, such as in cases involving fused discs in individuals with spinal cord injuries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10439961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104399612023-08-21 Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions Bédard, Sandrine Bouthillier, Maxime Cohen-Adad, Julien Sci Rep Article Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is an important MRI biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in various neurodegenerative and traumatic spinal cord diseases. However, the conventional method of computing CSA based on vertebral levels is inherently flawed, as the prediction of spinal levels from vertebral levels lacks reliability, leading to considerable variability in CSA measurements. Computing CSA from an intrinsic neuroanatomical reference, the pontomedullary junction (PMJ), has been proposed in previous work to overcome limitations associated with using a vertebral reference. However, the validation of this alternative approach, along with its variability across and within participants under variable neck extensions, remains unexplored. The goal of this study was to determine if the variability of CSA across neck flexions/extensions is reduced when using the PMJ, compared to vertebral levels. Ten participants underwent a 3T MRI T2w isotropic scan at 0.6 mm(3) for 3 neck positions: extension, neutral and flexion. Spinal cord segmentation, vertebral labeling, PMJ labeling, and CSA were computed automatically while spinal segments were labeled manually. Mean coefficient of variation for CSA across neck positions was 3.99 ± 2.96% for the PMJ method vs. 4.02 ± 3.01% for manual spinal segment method vs. 4.46 ± 3.10% for the disc method. These differences were not statistically significant. The PMJ method was slightly more reliable than the disc-based method to compute CSA at specific spinal segments, although the difference was not statistically significant. This suggests that the PMJ can serve as a valuable alternative and reliable method for estimating CSA when a disc-based approach is challenging or not feasible, such as in cases involving fused discs in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10439961/ /pubmed/37598229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40731-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bédard, Sandrine Bouthillier, Maxime Cohen-Adad, Julien Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
title | Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
title_full | Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
title_fullStr | Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
title_full_unstemmed | Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
title_short | Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
title_sort | pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37598229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40731-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bedardsandrine pontomedullaryjunctionasareferenceforspinalcordcrosssectionalareavalidationacrossneckpositions AT bouthilliermaxime pontomedullaryjunctionasareferenceforspinalcordcrosssectionalareavalidationacrossneckpositions AT cohenadadjulien pontomedullaryjunctionasareferenceforspinalcordcrosssectionalareavalidationacrossneckpositions |