Cargando…

Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms

BACKGROUND: Methods for segmentation, i.e., Full-segmentation (FS) and Segmentation-rotation (SR), are proposed for maintaining Computed Tomography (CT) number linearity. However, their effectiveness has not yet been tested against noise. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of nois...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anam, Choirul, Amilia, Riska, Naufal, Ariij, Sutanto, Heri, Dwihapsari, Yanurita, Fujibuchi, Toshioh, Dougherty, Geoff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609515
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599
_version_ 1785093145375014912
author Anam, Choirul
Amilia, Riska
Naufal, Ariij
Sutanto, Heri
Dwihapsari, Yanurita
Fujibuchi, Toshioh
Dougherty, Geoff
author_facet Anam, Choirul
Amilia, Riska
Naufal, Ariij
Sutanto, Heri
Dwihapsari, Yanurita
Fujibuchi, Toshioh
Dougherty, Geoff
author_sort Anam, Choirul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methods for segmentation, i.e., Full-segmentation (FS) and Segmentation-rotation (SR), are proposed for maintaining Computed Tomography (CT) number linearity. However, their effectiveness has not yet been tested against noise. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of noise on the accuracy of CT number linearity of the FS and SR methods on American College of Radiology (ACR) CT and computational phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This experimental study utilized two phantoms, ACR CT and computational phantoms. An ACR CT phantom was scanned by a 128-slice CT scanner with various tube currents from 80 to 200 mA to acquire various noises, with other constant parameters. The computational phantom was added by different Gaussian noises between 20 and 120 Hounsfield Units (HU). The CT number linearity was measured by the FS and SR methods, and the accuracy of CT number linearity was computed on two phantoms. RESULTS: The two methods successfully segmented both phantoms at low noise, i.e., less than 60 HU. However, segmentation and measurement of CT number linearity are not accurate on a computational phantom using the FS method for more than 60-HU noise. The SR method is still accurate up to 120 HU of noise. CONCLUSION: The SR method outperformed the FS method to measure the CT number linearity due to its endurance in extreme noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10440409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104404092023-08-22 Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms Anam, Choirul Amilia, Riska Naufal, Ariij Sutanto, Heri Dwihapsari, Yanurita Fujibuchi, Toshioh Dougherty, Geoff J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: Methods for segmentation, i.e., Full-segmentation (FS) and Segmentation-rotation (SR), are proposed for maintaining Computed Tomography (CT) number linearity. However, their effectiveness has not yet been tested against noise. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of noise on the accuracy of CT number linearity of the FS and SR methods on American College of Radiology (ACR) CT and computational phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This experimental study utilized two phantoms, ACR CT and computational phantoms. An ACR CT phantom was scanned by a 128-slice CT scanner with various tube currents from 80 to 200 mA to acquire various noises, with other constant parameters. The computational phantom was added by different Gaussian noises between 20 and 120 Hounsfield Units (HU). The CT number linearity was measured by the FS and SR methods, and the accuracy of CT number linearity was computed on two phantoms. RESULTS: The two methods successfully segmented both phantoms at low noise, i.e., less than 60 HU. However, segmentation and measurement of CT number linearity are not accurate on a computational phantom using the FS method for more than 60-HU noise. The SR method is still accurate up to 120 HU of noise. CONCLUSION: The SR method outperformed the FS method to measure the CT number linearity due to its endurance in extreme noise. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10440409/ /pubmed/37609515 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anam, Choirul
Amilia, Riska
Naufal, Ariij
Sutanto, Heri
Dwihapsari, Yanurita
Fujibuchi, Toshioh
Dougherty, Geoff
Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
title Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
title_full Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
title_fullStr Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
title_short Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
title_sort impact of noise level on the accuracy of automated measurement of ct number linearity on acr ct and computational phantoms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609515
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599
work_keys_str_mv AT anamchoirul impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms
AT amiliariska impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms
AT naufalariij impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms
AT sutantoheri impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms
AT dwihapsariyanurita impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms
AT fujibuchitoshioh impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms
AT doughertygeoff impactofnoiselevelontheaccuracyofautomatedmeasurementofctnumberlinearityonacrctandcomputationalphantoms