Cargando…

Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the standalone and combined mid-term effects of conventional physiotherapy and lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides on pain, range of motion, fear avoidance belief, and functional status in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şimşek, Şule, Yağcı, Nesrin, Bergin Korkmaz, Merve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Atatürk University School of Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403913
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.0202
_version_ 1785093271510319104
author Şimşek, Şule
Yağcı, Nesrin
Bergin Korkmaz, Merve
author_facet Şimşek, Şule
Yağcı, Nesrin
Bergin Korkmaz, Merve
author_sort Şimşek, Şule
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the standalone and combined mid-term effects of conventional physiotherapy and lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides on pain, range of motion, fear avoidance belief, and functional status in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical study was conducted in a state hospital. Fifty-five patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (mean age: 40.69 ± 6.27 years) were divided into 3 groups. Group I (n = 18) received conventional physiotherapy (electrotherapy and heat application) 5 days a week for 3 weeks, group II (n = 19) received lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides 3 days a week for 3 weeks. Group III (n = 18) received conventional physiotherapy plus lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides. Pain (visual analog scale), flexion range of motion (back range of motion II), functional status (Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire), and fear avoidance belief (Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire) were assessed at baseline, third week, and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of intervention, all outcome measures improved in groups II and III. These improvements remained significant until 6-month follow-up (P < .05), except fear avoidance belief (P = .06) and flexion range of motion (P = .764) scores of group III. Flexion range of motion (P = .001), functional status (P = .001), and fear avoidance belief (P = .03) differed significantly between the 3 groups at 6-month follow-up; post-hoc analysis revealed that flexion range of motion (P < .0001), functional status (P = .037), and fear avoidance belief (P = .002) scores were significantly improved in group II compared to group I. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional physiotherapy, lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides improved mid-term range of motion, functional status, and fear avoidance belief, but there was no difference in pain. Conventional physiotherapy added to lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides provided no additional benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10440974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Atatürk University School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104409742023-08-22 Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Şimşek, Şule Yağcı, Nesrin Bergin Korkmaz, Merve Eurasian J Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the standalone and combined mid-term effects of conventional physiotherapy and lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides on pain, range of motion, fear avoidance belief, and functional status in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical study was conducted in a state hospital. Fifty-five patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (mean age: 40.69 ± 6.27 years) were divided into 3 groups. Group I (n = 18) received conventional physiotherapy (electrotherapy and heat application) 5 days a week for 3 weeks, group II (n = 19) received lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides 3 days a week for 3 weeks. Group III (n = 18) received conventional physiotherapy plus lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides. Pain (visual analog scale), flexion range of motion (back range of motion II), functional status (Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire), and fear avoidance belief (Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire) were assessed at baseline, third week, and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of intervention, all outcome measures improved in groups II and III. These improvements remained significant until 6-month follow-up (P < .05), except fear avoidance belief (P = .06) and flexion range of motion (P = .764) scores of group III. Flexion range of motion (P = .001), functional status (P = .001), and fear avoidance belief (P = .03) differed significantly between the 3 groups at 6-month follow-up; post-hoc analysis revealed that flexion range of motion (P < .0001), functional status (P = .037), and fear avoidance belief (P = .002) scores were significantly improved in group II compared to group I. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional physiotherapy, lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides improved mid-term range of motion, functional status, and fear avoidance belief, but there was no difference in pain. Conventional physiotherapy added to lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides provided no additional benefit. Atatürk University School of Medicine 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10440974/ /pubmed/37403913 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.0202 Text en © Copyright 2023 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Şimşek, Şule
Yağcı, Nesrin
Bergin Korkmaz, Merve
Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Mid-term Effect of Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort mid-term effect of lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403913
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.0202
work_keys_str_mv AT simseksule midtermeffectoflumbarsustainednaturalapophysealglidesinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpainarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yagcınesrin midtermeffectoflumbarsustainednaturalapophysealglidesinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpainarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT berginkorkmazmerve midtermeffectoflumbarsustainednaturalapophysealglidesinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpainarandomizedclinicaltrial