Cargando…

Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: National guidelines emphasise the need to enhance arm and hand recovery poststroke. OnTrack is a 12-week package aiming to address this need. Feasibility was evaluated in a single-arm feasibility study (reported separately). This paper presents findings from a nested process e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Elizabeth, Fusari, Gianpaolo, Darzi, Ara, Jones, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37597873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062119
_version_ 1785093293933068288
author Taylor, Elizabeth
Fusari, Gianpaolo
Darzi, Ara
Jones, Fiona
author_facet Taylor, Elizabeth
Fusari, Gianpaolo
Darzi, Ara
Jones, Fiona
author_sort Taylor, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: National guidelines emphasise the need to enhance arm and hand recovery poststroke. OnTrack is a 12-week package aiming to address this need. Feasibility was evaluated in a single-arm feasibility study (reported separately). This paper presents findings from a nested process evaluation. The objectives were to explore users’ experiences of OnTrack and fidelity of delivery, in order to inform a definitive trial of effectiveness and future delivery. SETTING: Participants were interviewed in a range of settings in hospital, home or via telephone, at the end of their intervention cycle. Session observations for a selection of coaching sessions were carried out in person at home or remotely, post-COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants who completed the intervention following a stroke were interviewed. Seven coaching sessions were observed. INTERVENTION: This process evaluation was part of a larger feasibility study of OnTrack, which involves setting movement targets and monitoring activity using a tracker on the wrist, motivational messaging via a Smartphone and self-management coaching. Preliminary analysis of data collected was conducted with a public and patient involvement group formed of stroke survivors. This informed changes in intervention delivery. RESULTS: Participants reported finding the OnTrack programme beneficial, with the coaching role seen as particularly important. Participants found activity tracking motivating, but some noted discrepancies between tracked movement and what they considered useful activity. Motivational messages were sometimes irritating. Most felt ready to sustain their own activity practice at the end of the programme. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation supported initial theoretical assumptions that OnTrack would enable activity practice through the use of remote monitoring. There was a strong emphasis on the coaching role as a mechanism of impact supporting the technological intervention. These findings will inform the next stages of delivery in a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03944486.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104410622023-08-22 Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack Taylor, Elizabeth Fusari, Gianpaolo Darzi, Ara Jones, Fiona BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: National guidelines emphasise the need to enhance arm and hand recovery poststroke. OnTrack is a 12-week package aiming to address this need. Feasibility was evaluated in a single-arm feasibility study (reported separately). This paper presents findings from a nested process evaluation. The objectives were to explore users’ experiences of OnTrack and fidelity of delivery, in order to inform a definitive trial of effectiveness and future delivery. SETTING: Participants were interviewed in a range of settings in hospital, home or via telephone, at the end of their intervention cycle. Session observations for a selection of coaching sessions were carried out in person at home or remotely, post-COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants who completed the intervention following a stroke were interviewed. Seven coaching sessions were observed. INTERVENTION: This process evaluation was part of a larger feasibility study of OnTrack, which involves setting movement targets and monitoring activity using a tracker on the wrist, motivational messaging via a Smartphone and self-management coaching. Preliminary analysis of data collected was conducted with a public and patient involvement group formed of stroke survivors. This informed changes in intervention delivery. RESULTS: Participants reported finding the OnTrack programme beneficial, with the coaching role seen as particularly important. Participants found activity tracking motivating, but some noted discrepancies between tracked movement and what they considered useful activity. Motivational messages were sometimes irritating. Most felt ready to sustain their own activity practice at the end of the programme. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation supported initial theoretical assumptions that OnTrack would enable activity practice through the use of remote monitoring. There was a strong emphasis on the coaching role as a mechanism of impact supporting the technological intervention. These findings will inform the next stages of delivery in a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03944486. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10441062/ /pubmed/37597873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062119 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Taylor, Elizabeth
Fusari, Gianpaolo
Darzi, Ara
Jones, Fiona
Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack
title Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack
title_full Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack
title_fullStr Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack
title_full_unstemmed Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack
title_short Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack
title_sort is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? a qualitative process evaluation of ontrack
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37597873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062119
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorelizabeth isanoveldigitalsystemforarmandhandrehabilitationsuitableforstrokesurvivorsaqualitativeprocessevaluationofontrack
AT fusarigianpaolo isanoveldigitalsystemforarmandhandrehabilitationsuitableforstrokesurvivorsaqualitativeprocessevaluationofontrack
AT darziara isanoveldigitalsystemforarmandhandrehabilitationsuitableforstrokesurvivorsaqualitativeprocessevaluationofontrack
AT jonesfiona isanoveldigitalsystemforarmandhandrehabilitationsuitableforstrokesurvivorsaqualitativeprocessevaluationofontrack