Implementation and impact of a point of care electroencephalography platform in a community hospital: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and financial feasibility of implementing a poc-EEG system in a community hospital. DESIGN: Data from a prospective cohort displaying abnormal mentation concerning for NCSE or rhythmic movements due to potential underlying seizure necessitating EEG was collected and compared to a control group containing patient data from 2020. SETTING: A teaching community hospital with limited EEG support. PATIENTS: The study group consisted of patients requiring emergent EEG during hours when conventional EEG was unavailable. Control group is made up of patients who were emergently transferred for EEG during the historical period. INTERVENTIONS: Application and interpretation of Ceribell®, a poc-EEG system. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: 88 patients were eligible with indications for poc-EEG including hyperkinetic movements post-cardiac arrest (19%), abnormal mentation after possible seizure (46%), and unresponsive patients with concern for NCSE (35%). 21% had seizure burden on poc-EEG and 4.5% had seizure activity on follow-up EEG. A mean of 1.1 patients per month required transfer to a tertiary care center for continuous EEG. For the control period, a total of 22 patients or a mean of 2 patients per month were transferred for emergent EEG. Annually, we observed a decrease in the number of transferred patients in the post-implementation period by 10.8 (95% CI: −2.17–23.64, p = 0.1). Financial analysis of the control found the hospital system incurred a loss of $3,463.11 per patient transferred for an annual loss of $83,114.64. In the study group, this would compute to an annual loss of $45,713.05 for an overall decrease in amount lost of $37,401.59. We compared amount lost per patient between historical controls and study patients. Implementation of poc-EEG resulted in an overall decrease in annual amount lost of $37,401.59 by avoidance of transfer fees. We calculated the amount gained per patient in the study group to be $13,936.44. To cover the cost of the poc-EEG system, 8.59 patients would need to avoid transfer annually. CONCLUSION: A poc-EEG system can be safely implemented in a community hospital leading to an absolute decrease in transfers to tertiary hospital. This decrease in patient transfers can cover the cost of implementing the poc-EEG system. The additional benefits from transfer avoidance include clinical benefits such as rapid appropriate treatment of seizures and avoidance of unnecessary treatment as well as negating transfer risk and keeping the patient at their local hospital.