Cargando…

Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a neurological disorder that is potentially reversible and clinically characterized by a specific triad of symptoms, including gait disturbance, cognitive disorders, and urinary incontinence. In INPH assessment, the most commonly used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mori, Laura, Collino, Federica, Marzi, Annalisa, Pellegrino, Lucia, Ponzano, Marta, Chiaro, Davide Del, Maestrini, Sara, Caneva, Stefano, Pardini, Matteo, Fiaschi, Pietro, Zona, Gianluigi, Trompetto, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1201932
_version_ 1785093340008546304
author Mori, Laura
Collino, Federica
Marzi, Annalisa
Pellegrino, Lucia
Ponzano, Marta
Chiaro, Davide Del
Maestrini, Sara
Caneva, Stefano
Pardini, Matteo
Fiaschi, Pietro
Zona, Gianluigi
Trompetto, Carlo
author_facet Mori, Laura
Collino, Federica
Marzi, Annalisa
Pellegrino, Lucia
Ponzano, Marta
Chiaro, Davide Del
Maestrini, Sara
Caneva, Stefano
Pardini, Matteo
Fiaschi, Pietro
Zona, Gianluigi
Trompetto, Carlo
author_sort Mori, Laura
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a neurological disorder that is potentially reversible and clinically characterized by a specific triad of symptoms, including gait disturbance, cognitive disorders, and urinary incontinence. In INPH assessment, the most commonly used test is the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), but a more comprehensive assessment would be necessary. The first aim of the present study is to verify the sensitivity of a protocol with both clinical and instrumental outcome measures for gait and balance in recognizing INPH patients. The second aim is to verify the most important spatio-temporal parameters in INPH assessment and their possible correlations with clinical outcome measures. METHODS: Between January 2019 and June 2022, we evaluated 70 INPH subjects. We assessed balance performances with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and TUG, both single (ST) and dual task (DT). We also performed an instrumental gait assessment with the GAITRite electronic walkway system, asking the patients to walk on the carpet for one minute at normal speed, fast speed, and while performing a dual task. We compared the results with those of 20 age-matched healthy subjects (HS). RESULTS: INPH patients obtained statistically significant lower scores at the BBS, SPPB, and TUG DT but not at the TUG ST, likely because the DT involves cognitive factors altered in these subjects. Concerning instrumental gait evaluation, we found significant differences between HS and INPH patients in almost all spatio-temporal parameters except cadence, which is considered a relevant factor in INPH guidelines. We also found significant correlations between balance outcome measures and gait parameters. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm the usefulness of BBS and suggest improving the assessment with SPPB. Although the TUG ST is the most commonly used test in the literature to evaluate INPH performances, it does not identify INPH; the TUG DT, instead, might be more useful. The GAITRite system is recognized as a quick and reliable tool to assess walking abilities and spatio-temporal parameters in INPH patients, and the most useful parameters are stride length, stride width, speed, and the percentage of double support. Both clinical and instrumental evaluation may be useful in recognizing subjects at risk for falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104412372023-08-22 Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation Mori, Laura Collino, Federica Marzi, Annalisa Pellegrino, Lucia Ponzano, Marta Chiaro, Davide Del Maestrini, Sara Caneva, Stefano Pardini, Matteo Fiaschi, Pietro Zona, Gianluigi Trompetto, Carlo Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a neurological disorder that is potentially reversible and clinically characterized by a specific triad of symptoms, including gait disturbance, cognitive disorders, and urinary incontinence. In INPH assessment, the most commonly used test is the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), but a more comprehensive assessment would be necessary. The first aim of the present study is to verify the sensitivity of a protocol with both clinical and instrumental outcome measures for gait and balance in recognizing INPH patients. The second aim is to verify the most important spatio-temporal parameters in INPH assessment and their possible correlations with clinical outcome measures. METHODS: Between January 2019 and June 2022, we evaluated 70 INPH subjects. We assessed balance performances with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and TUG, both single (ST) and dual task (DT). We also performed an instrumental gait assessment with the GAITRite electronic walkway system, asking the patients to walk on the carpet for one minute at normal speed, fast speed, and while performing a dual task. We compared the results with those of 20 age-matched healthy subjects (HS). RESULTS: INPH patients obtained statistically significant lower scores at the BBS, SPPB, and TUG DT but not at the TUG ST, likely because the DT involves cognitive factors altered in these subjects. Concerning instrumental gait evaluation, we found significant differences between HS and INPH patients in almost all spatio-temporal parameters except cadence, which is considered a relevant factor in INPH guidelines. We also found significant correlations between balance outcome measures and gait parameters. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm the usefulness of BBS and suggest improving the assessment with SPPB. Although the TUG ST is the most commonly used test in the literature to evaluate INPH performances, it does not identify INPH; the TUG DT, instead, might be more useful. The GAITRite system is recognized as a quick and reliable tool to assess walking abilities and spatio-temporal parameters in INPH patients, and the most useful parameters are stride length, stride width, speed, and the percentage of double support. Both clinical and instrumental evaluation may be useful in recognizing subjects at risk for falls. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10441237/ /pubmed/37609661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1201932 Text en Copyright © 2023 Mori, Collino, Marzi, Pellegrino, Ponzano, Chiaro, Maestrini, Caneva, Pardini, Fiaschi, Zona, Trompetto and Ligurian INPH Study. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Mori, Laura
Collino, Federica
Marzi, Annalisa
Pellegrino, Lucia
Ponzano, Marta
Chiaro, Davide Del
Maestrini, Sara
Caneva, Stefano
Pardini, Matteo
Fiaschi, Pietro
Zona, Gianluigi
Trompetto, Carlo
Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation
title Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation
title_full Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation
title_fullStr Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation
title_short Useful outcome measures in INPH patients evaluation
title_sort useful outcome measures in inph patients evaluation
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1201932
work_keys_str_mv AT morilaura usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT collinofederica usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT marziannalisa usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT pellegrinolucia usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT ponzanomarta usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT chiarodavidedel usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT maestrinisara usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT canevastefano usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT pardinimatteo usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT fiaschipietro usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT zonagianluigi usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT trompettocarlo usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation
AT usefuloutcomemeasuresininphpatientsevaluation