Cargando…

In-person and virtual adaptation of an interprofessional palliative care communications skills training course for pediatric oncology clinicians

PURPOSE: Effective, empathic communication is crucial for pediatric oncology clinicians when discussing palliative and end-of-life (PC/EOL) care with parents of children with cancer. Unfortunately, many parents report inadequate communication at these distressing times. This study evaluates the comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moody, Karen M., Andersen, Clark, Bradley, Julie, Draper, Lauren, Garrington, Timothy, Gill, Jonathan, Harrison, Douglas, Hayashi, Masanori, Heaton, Amy, Holladay, Cynthia, Lion, Alex, Rajan, Alakh, Rozo, Beatriz, Runco, Daniel, Salvador, Laura, Ferguson, Verna, Arnold, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609163
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3228580/v1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Effective, empathic communication is crucial for pediatric oncology clinicians when discussing palliative and end-of-life (PC/EOL) care with parents of children with cancer. Unfortunately, many parents report inadequate communication at these distressing times. This study evaluates the communication skills training (CST) clinicians received to deliver a PC/EOL communication intervention as part of a multi-site randomized-controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: Clinicians from eight sites formed dyads (one physician and one nurse [RN] or advanced practice provider [APP]) and were trained over 3 days (in-person or virtually). Training was adapted from VitalTalk(™) and included didactic instruction, videos, visual aids, and dedicated time to practice with simulated patients. Study participants completed a confidential, post-training online evaluation survey. A self-reported quality assurance checklist was used to measure fidelity to the communication protocol when delivered to parents during the RCT. RESULTS: Thirty clinicians completed training; 26 completed post-training surveys including twelve (46.1%) physicians, 8 (30.8%) RNs and 6 (23.1%) APPs. Most were female (65.4%); white (80.8%), not Latinx (88.5%); 40-50 years old (53.9%); and in practice over 10 years (65.4%). Nine (34.6%) trained in-person; the rest trained virtually. Ninety-two percent reported the course was valuable or very valuable for developing their PC/EOL communication skills and 96% reported learning something new. Dyads trained virtually had similar fidelity to those trained in-person (95% and 90% respectively) when delivering the PC/EOL communication intervention to parents. CONCLUSION: This PC/EOL CST was valuable for improving pediatric oncology clinicians’ communication skills, successfully implemented in-person and virtually, and translated effectively into practice.