Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population

BACKGROUND: Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rondung, Elisabet, Oliveira, Sandra, Esteves, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2
_version_ 1785093425835540480
author Rondung, Elisabet
Oliveira, Sandra
Esteves, Francisco
author_facet Rondung, Elisabet
Oliveira, Sandra
Esteves, Francisco
author_sort Rondung, Elisabet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women. METHODS: A convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes. RESULTS: Principal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models. CONCLUSIONS: We find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104416882023-08-22 Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population Rondung, Elisabet Oliveira, Sandra Esteves, Francisco Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Physical end emotional changes during pregnancy may not only affect pregnant womens’ quality of life, but also how instruments assessing quality of life perform in such populations. To date, there is insufficient evidence on psychometric properties for both generic and condition-specific instruments measuring quality of life during pregnancy. The aim of this study was thus to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in a sample of pregnant women. METHODS: A convenience sample of 1015 pregnant women in Sweden completed the WHOQOL-BREF online. We examined the psychometric properties of the instrument using principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, item-domain correlations, correlations with overall QOL and general health, and multiple linear regression with items on overall QOL and general health as outcomes. RESULTS: Principal Component Analysis in a random subsample (n = 502) supported a four-factor model, encompassing the domains physical, psychological, social and environmental quality of life, but with four of the items originally in the environmental domain relocated to the other domains. The proposed domain structure showed good fit in confirmatory factor analysis in the other random subsample (n = 513). The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.885 and 0.826 respectively), while the social and environmental domains were weaker in this regard. All domains showed significant positive correlations with items on overall QOL and general health. The physical and psychological domains were the most evident predictors in the regression models. CONCLUSIONS: We find the Swedish version of the WHOQOL-BREF to have good psychometric properties to be used in samples of pregnant women, and propose an alternative domain structure that might be even more useful for assessing quality of life during pregnancy. The physical and psychological domains showed good internal consistency and construct validity. BioMed Central 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10441688/ /pubmed/37605225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rondung, Elisabet
Oliveira, Sandra
Esteves, Francisco
Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_full Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_short Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population
title_sort validity and reliability of the whoqol-bref in a pregnant population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rondungelisabet validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation
AT oliveirasandra validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation
AT estevesfrancisco validityandreliabilityofthewhoqolbrefinapregnantpopulation