Cargando…

Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate current preceptorship provision across AHP professions in the Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent (SSOT) region of England to improve consistency, share and optimise best practice. BACKGROUND: Preceptorship, defined as a period of structured transition from newly qualifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salt, E., Jackman, K., O’Brien, A. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04515-7
_version_ 1785093426327322624
author Salt, E.
Jackman, K.
O’Brien, A. V.
author_facet Salt, E.
Jackman, K.
O’Brien, A. V.
author_sort Salt, E.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to evaluate current preceptorship provision across AHP professions in the Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent (SSOT) region of England to improve consistency, share and optimise best practice. BACKGROUND: Preceptorship, defined as a period of structured transition from newly qualified to an independent practitioner, is thought to improve recruitment and retention of staff and ultimately improve patient care. During the COVID pandemic, SSOT recognised the potential for graduates to lack confidence having had reduced clinical exposure as pre-registration students, and so a likely increased need to support newly qualified staff, and to evaluate existing AHP preceptorship provision. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design, utilising a cross sectional survey questionnaire and two subsequent focus groups, explored existing AHP preceptorship in SSOT in 2021. Following ethical approval respondents were recruited via professional networks who completed an online survey questionnaire. Two subsequent focus groups enabled an in-depth exploration of survey results. Descriptive statistics summarised survey data and thematic analysis was used to describe focus group findings. RESULTS: SSOT AHPs (n = 217; 26% preceptees; 47% preceptors) participated in the survey questionnaire and 17 AHPs in the focus groups. 57% of preceptees rated existing preceptorship programmes to be “somewhat, or not effective”. Preceptors reported feeling unprepared for their role. Both preceptees and preceptors reported that, post pandemic, most existing programs required revisions to be fit for purpose. Ten pragmatic summary recommendations were made. CONCLUSIONS: Allied Health Professions Preceptorship in SSOT was found to be inconsistent, poorly understood and inadequate. Revisions to preceptorship programs across Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent NHS Trusts have been instigated to reflect changes in AHP practice since the COVID pandemic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04515-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104416902023-08-22 Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study Salt, E. Jackman, K. O’Brien, A. V. BMC Med Educ Research AIM: This study aimed to evaluate current preceptorship provision across AHP professions in the Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent (SSOT) region of England to improve consistency, share and optimise best practice. BACKGROUND: Preceptorship, defined as a period of structured transition from newly qualified to an independent practitioner, is thought to improve recruitment and retention of staff and ultimately improve patient care. During the COVID pandemic, SSOT recognised the potential for graduates to lack confidence having had reduced clinical exposure as pre-registration students, and so a likely increased need to support newly qualified staff, and to evaluate existing AHP preceptorship provision. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design, utilising a cross sectional survey questionnaire and two subsequent focus groups, explored existing AHP preceptorship in SSOT in 2021. Following ethical approval respondents were recruited via professional networks who completed an online survey questionnaire. Two subsequent focus groups enabled an in-depth exploration of survey results. Descriptive statistics summarised survey data and thematic analysis was used to describe focus group findings. RESULTS: SSOT AHPs (n = 217; 26% preceptees; 47% preceptors) participated in the survey questionnaire and 17 AHPs in the focus groups. 57% of preceptees rated existing preceptorship programmes to be “somewhat, or not effective”. Preceptors reported feeling unprepared for their role. Both preceptees and preceptors reported that, post pandemic, most existing programs required revisions to be fit for purpose. Ten pragmatic summary recommendations were made. CONCLUSIONS: Allied Health Professions Preceptorship in SSOT was found to be inconsistent, poorly understood and inadequate. Revisions to preceptorship programs across Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent NHS Trusts have been instigated to reflect changes in AHP practice since the COVID pandemic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04515-7. BioMed Central 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10441690/ /pubmed/37605120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04515-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Salt, E.
Jackman, K.
O’Brien, A. V.
Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study
title Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study
title_full Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study
title_short Evaluation of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent Allied Health Professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method UK study
title_sort evaluation of staffordshire, stoke on trent allied health professionals preceptorship programmes: a mixed method uk study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04515-7
work_keys_str_mv AT salte evaluationofstaffordshirestokeontrentalliedhealthprofessionalspreceptorshipprogrammesamixedmethodukstudy
AT jackmank evaluationofstaffordshirestokeontrentalliedhealthprofessionalspreceptorshipprogrammesamixedmethodukstudy
AT obrienav evaluationofstaffordshirestokeontrentalliedhealthprofessionalspreceptorshipprogrammesamixedmethodukstudy