Cargando…

Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?

BACKGROUND: We compared the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). METHODS: We performed single-incision gastric wedge resection on prospectively-enrolled 15 consecutive patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Ji Won, Park, Ki Bum, Chin, Hyung Min, Jun, Kyong-Hwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02141-0
_version_ 1785093430278356992
author Seo, Ji Won
Park, Ki Bum
Chin, Hyung Min
Jun, Kyong-Hwa
author_facet Seo, Ji Won
Park, Ki Bum
Chin, Hyung Min
Jun, Kyong-Hwa
author_sort Seo, Ji Won
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We compared the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). METHODS: We performed single-incision gastric wedge resection on prospectively-enrolled 15 consecutive patients with gastric GIST between November 2020 and April 2022 in a single tertiary center. The early perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients who underwent CLS. The indications did not differ from those for conventional laparoscopic procedures for gastric GIST. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were assigned to the SILS (n = 15) and CLS (n = 15) groups. There were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the SILS and CLS groups. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to multiple-port or open surgery in the SILS group. Proximally located tumors were more commonly treated with CLS than with SILS (P = 0.045). GISTs located in the greater curvature were more commonly treated with SILS than with CLS, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). The mean incision length in the SILS group was 4.1 cm shorter than that in the CLS group (3.2 ± 0.7 and 7.3 ± 5.2 cm, respectively, P = 0.01). The postoperative analgesic dose was significantly lower in the SILS than in the CLS group (0.4 ± 1.4 and 2.1 ± 2.3, respectively P = 0.01). Also, the duration of postoperative use of analgesic was shorter in SILS than in CLS (0.4 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the early postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: SILS is as safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of gastric GIST as CLS with comparable postoperative complications, pain, and cosmesis. Moreover, SILS can be considered without being affected by the type or location of the tumor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-023-02141-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104417062023-08-22 Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor? Seo, Ji Won Park, Ki Bum Chin, Hyung Min Jun, Kyong-Hwa BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: We compared the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). METHODS: We performed single-incision gastric wedge resection on prospectively-enrolled 15 consecutive patients with gastric GIST between November 2020 and April 2022 in a single tertiary center. The early perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients who underwent CLS. The indications did not differ from those for conventional laparoscopic procedures for gastric GIST. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were assigned to the SILS (n = 15) and CLS (n = 15) groups. There were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the SILS and CLS groups. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to multiple-port or open surgery in the SILS group. Proximally located tumors were more commonly treated with CLS than with SILS (P = 0.045). GISTs located in the greater curvature were more commonly treated with SILS than with CLS, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). The mean incision length in the SILS group was 4.1 cm shorter than that in the CLS group (3.2 ± 0.7 and 7.3 ± 5.2 cm, respectively, P = 0.01). The postoperative analgesic dose was significantly lower in the SILS than in the CLS group (0.4 ± 1.4 and 2.1 ± 2.3, respectively P = 0.01). Also, the duration of postoperative use of analgesic was shorter in SILS than in CLS (0.4 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the early postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: SILS is as safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of gastric GIST as CLS with comparable postoperative complications, pain, and cosmesis. Moreover, SILS can be considered without being affected by the type or location of the tumor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-023-02141-0. BioMed Central 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10441706/ /pubmed/37605202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02141-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Seo, Ji Won
Park, Ki Bum
Chin, Hyung Min
Jun, Kyong-Hwa
Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?
title Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?
title_full Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?
title_fullStr Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?
title_full_unstemmed Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?
title_short Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?
title_sort is single incision laparoscopic surgery (sils) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gist) dependent on the location of the tumor?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02141-0
work_keys_str_mv AT seojiwon issingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorgistdependentonthelocationofthetumor
AT parkkibum issingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorgistdependentonthelocationofthetumor
AT chinhyungmin issingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorgistdependentonthelocationofthetumor
AT junkyonghwa issingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorgistdependentonthelocationofthetumor