Cargando…

Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?

BACKGROUND: While outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lete, Coralie, Brichard, Martin, Rosa, Maria Luisa, Salavracos, Mike, Hubert, Catherine, Navez, Benoit, Closset, Jean, Pezzullo, Martina, Navez, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02133-0
_version_ 1785093437000777728
author Lete, Coralie
Brichard, Martin
Rosa, Maria Luisa
Salavracos, Mike
Hubert, Catherine
Navez, Benoit
Closset, Jean
Pezzullo, Martina
Navez, Julie
author_facet Lete, Coralie
Brichard, Martin
Rosa, Maria Luisa
Salavracos, Mike
Hubert, Catherine
Navez, Benoit
Closset, Jean
Pezzullo, Martina
Navez, Julie
author_sort Lete, Coralie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP with or without splenic vessels removal. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent SP-DP with splenic vessels removal (Warshaw technique, WDP) or preservation (Kimura technique, KDP) between 2010 and 2022 in two tertiary centres were retrospectively analysed. Splenic ischemia and volume at early/late imaging and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, 51 in the WDP and 36 in the KDP groups. Median Charlson’s Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the WDP group compared with the KDP group. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was more splenic ischemia at early imaging in the WDP group compared to the KDP group (55% vs. 14%, p = 0.018), especially severe ischemia (23% vs. 0%). Partial splenic atrophy was observed in 29% and 0% in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively (p = 0.002); no complete splenic atrophy was observed. Platelet levels at POD 1, 2 and 6 were significantly higher in the WDP group compared to KDP group. At univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction were prognostic factors for development of splenic atrophy. No episodes of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection or secondary splenectomy were recorded after a median follow-up of 9 and 11 months in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic ischemia appeared in one-half of patients undergoing SP-DP with splenic vessels removal at early imaging, and partial splenic atrophy in almost 30% at late imaging, without clinical impact or complete splenic atrophy. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction could help to predict the occurrence of splenic atrophy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104417332023-08-22 Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ? Lete, Coralie Brichard, Martin Rosa, Maria Luisa Salavracos, Mike Hubert, Catherine Navez, Benoit Closset, Jean Pezzullo, Martina Navez, Julie BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: While outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP with or without splenic vessels removal. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent SP-DP with splenic vessels removal (Warshaw technique, WDP) or preservation (Kimura technique, KDP) between 2010 and 2022 in two tertiary centres were retrospectively analysed. Splenic ischemia and volume at early/late imaging and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, 51 in the WDP and 36 in the KDP groups. Median Charlson’s Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the WDP group compared with the KDP group. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was more splenic ischemia at early imaging in the WDP group compared to the KDP group (55% vs. 14%, p = 0.018), especially severe ischemia (23% vs. 0%). Partial splenic atrophy was observed in 29% and 0% in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively (p = 0.002); no complete splenic atrophy was observed. Platelet levels at POD 1, 2 and 6 were significantly higher in the WDP group compared to KDP group. At univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction were prognostic factors for development of splenic atrophy. No episodes of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection or secondary splenectomy were recorded after a median follow-up of 9 and 11 months in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic ischemia appeared in one-half of patients undergoing SP-DP with splenic vessels removal at early imaging, and partial splenic atrophy in almost 30% at late imaging, without clinical impact or complete splenic atrophy. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction could help to predict the occurrence of splenic atrophy. BioMed Central 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10441733/ /pubmed/37605170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02133-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lete, Coralie
Brichard, Martin
Rosa, Maria Luisa
Salavracos, Mike
Hubert, Catherine
Navez, Benoit
Closset, Jean
Pezzullo, Martina
Navez, Julie
Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
title Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
title_full Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
title_fullStr Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
title_full_unstemmed Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
title_short Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
title_sort spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02133-0
work_keys_str_mv AT letecoralie spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT brichardmartin spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT rosamarialuisa spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT salavracosmike spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT hubertcatherine spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT navezbenoit spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT clossetjean spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT pezzullomartina spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma
AT navezjulie spleenpreservingpancreatectomywithremovalofsplenicvesselsimpactonsplenicparenchyma