Cargando…

Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asaoka, Ryo, Nakakura, Shunsuke, Mochizuki, Tsukasa, Ishida, Akiko, Fujino, Yuri, Ishii, Kaori, Obana, Akira, Tanito, Masaki, Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37548906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00777-y
_version_ 1785093463323181056
author Asaoka, Ryo
Nakakura, Shunsuke
Mochizuki, Tsukasa
Ishida, Akiko
Fujino, Yuri
Ishii, Kaori
Obana, Akira
Tanito, Masaki
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
author_facet Asaoka, Ryo
Nakakura, Shunsuke
Mochizuki, Tsukasa
Ishida, Akiko
Fujino, Yuri
Ishii, Kaori
Obana, Akira
Tanito, Masaki
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
author_sort Asaoka, Ryo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were  − 0.64 ± 1.4 and  − 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were  − 2.1 ± 3.3 and  − 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10441850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104418502023-08-22 Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject Asaoka, Ryo Nakakura, Shunsuke Mochizuki, Tsukasa Ishida, Akiko Fujino, Yuri Ishii, Kaori Obana, Akira Tanito, Masaki Kiuchi, Yoshiaki Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were  − 0.64 ± 1.4 and  − 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were  − 2.1 ± 3.3 and  − 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups. Springer Healthcare 2023-08-07 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10441850/ /pubmed/37548906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00777-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Asaoka, Ryo
Nakakura, Shunsuke
Mochizuki, Tsukasa
Ishida, Akiko
Fujino, Yuri
Ishii, Kaori
Obana, Akira
Tanito, Masaki
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject
title Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject
title_full Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject
title_fullStr Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject
title_full_unstemmed Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject
title_short Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject
title_sort which is more effective and safer? comparison of propensity score-matched microhook ab interno trabeculotomy and istent inject
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37548906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00777-y
work_keys_str_mv AT asaokaryo whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT nakakurashunsuke whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT mochizukitsukasa whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT ishidaakiko whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT fujinoyuri whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT ishiikaori whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT obanaakira whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT tanitomasaki whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject
AT kiuchiyoshiaki whichismoreeffectiveandsafercomparisonofpropensityscorematchedmicrohookabinternotrabeculotomyandistentinject