Cargando…

The Association Between Ocular Residual Astigmatism and the Efficacy of Astigmatism Correction Via Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

INTRODUCTION: Astigmatism correction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery is affected by several factors, including ocular residual astigmatism (ORA), which accounts for the vector difference between refractive and corneal astigmatism. Previous studies revealed the relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Chen-Cheng, Lin, Meng-Yin, Chang, Chao-Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00766-1
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Astigmatism correction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery is affected by several factors, including ocular residual astigmatism (ORA), which accounts for the vector difference between refractive and corneal astigmatism. Previous studies revealed the relationship between ORA and astigmatism correction after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). However, in SMILE surgery, no comprehensive study exploring the link between these two variables has been performed. We have therefore assessed the association between ORA and astigmatism correction after SMILE. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centered study. Patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism who underwent SMILE surgery using the 500-kHz Visumax laser platform and were followed up for at least 3 months were included. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, such as visual acuity, refractive status and corneal tomography, were recorded. ORA was calculated using Alpins Statistical System for Ophthalmic Refractive Surgery Techniques (ASSORT) Ocular Residual Astigmatism calculator. RESULTS: A total of 888 eyes (408 eyes from males and 480 eyes from females) from 444 patients (mean age [standard deviation] 32.4 ± 7.1 years) were included in our study. Mean (± SD) preoperative sphere and cylinder were − 5.45 ± 1.98 (range − 10.00–0.00) diopter (D) and − 0.89 ± 0.70 (range − 4.00–0.00) D, respectively. Calculated mean ORA was 0.68 ± 0.35 (range 0.07–3.53) D. Postoperative logMAR uncorrected visual acuity was 0.03 ± 0.31. Mean postoperative sphere and cylinder were − 0.10 ± 0.56 (range − 1.5 to 1.0) D and − 0.51 ± 0.37 (− 1.5 to 0.0) D, respectively. The Pearson correlation test revealed preoperative sphere, steep keratometry (steep-K) and ORA were statistically correlated with the amplitude of astigmatism correction (P < 0.001), and the generalized estimating equations analysis showed that ORA was negatively correlated with the amplitude of astigmatism correction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that preoperative higher ORA may be associated with a lower magnitude of astigmatism correction after SMILE surgery in patients with all levels of astigmatism preoperative. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05604872. Registered 3 November 2022—Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05604872.