Cargando…
Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of different incision positions on astigmatism and visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who decided to have SMILE to correct myopia. Patients were r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00748-3 |
_version_ | 1785093478115442688 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Shan Huang, Tianze Wang, Yuchen Ning, Ken Long, Qing Wang, Zhonghai Li, Ying Chen, Di |
author_facet | Yang, Shan Huang, Tianze Wang, Yuchen Ning, Ken Long, Qing Wang, Zhonghai Li, Ying Chen, Di |
author_sort | Yang, Shan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of different incision positions on astigmatism and visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who decided to have SMILE to correct myopia. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups of different incision positions (group A, B, and C with incision position at 90°, 120°, and 150° respectively). Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and high-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured and compared among groups. Astigmatism was analyzed with the ASSORT Group Analysis Calculator based on the Alpins method. RESULTS: A total of 148 eyes were included for analysis (48 eyes in group A, 50 eyes in group B, and 50 eyes in group C). At 1 month postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) logMAR in group A, B, and C was − 0.03, − 0.03, and − 0.04, respectively. The mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) logMAR in group A, B, and C was − 0.03, − 0.04, and − 0.04, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) values were − 0.01 ± 0.38, − 0.07 ± 0.39, and − 0.16 ± 0.49 (D) in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative magnitude of astigmatism among different groups (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the distribution of astigmatism axis among the three groups at 1 day (P = 0.02) and 1 week (P = 0.02) postoperatively. However, such differences were no longer significant at 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in HOAs among different groups 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Different incision positions have no effect on postoperative astigmatism and visual quality 1 month after SMILE surgery, though differences were found in the distribution of the astigmatism axis within 1 week after the surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10441924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104419242023-08-22 Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery Yang, Shan Huang, Tianze Wang, Yuchen Ning, Ken Long, Qing Wang, Zhonghai Li, Ying Chen, Di Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of different incision positions on astigmatism and visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who decided to have SMILE to correct myopia. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups of different incision positions (group A, B, and C with incision position at 90°, 120°, and 150° respectively). Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and high-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured and compared among groups. Astigmatism was analyzed with the ASSORT Group Analysis Calculator based on the Alpins method. RESULTS: A total of 148 eyes were included for analysis (48 eyes in group A, 50 eyes in group B, and 50 eyes in group C). At 1 month postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) logMAR in group A, B, and C was − 0.03, − 0.03, and − 0.04, respectively. The mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) logMAR in group A, B, and C was − 0.03, − 0.04, and − 0.04, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) values were − 0.01 ± 0.38, − 0.07 ± 0.39, and − 0.16 ± 0.49 (D) in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative magnitude of astigmatism among different groups (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the distribution of astigmatism axis among the three groups at 1 day (P = 0.02) and 1 week (P = 0.02) postoperatively. However, such differences were no longer significant at 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in HOAs among different groups 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Different incision positions have no effect on postoperative astigmatism and visual quality 1 month after SMILE surgery, though differences were found in the distribution of the astigmatism axis within 1 week after the surgery. Springer Healthcare 2023-06-16 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10441924/ /pubmed/37328617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00748-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yang, Shan Huang, Tianze Wang, Yuchen Ning, Ken Long, Qing Wang, Zhonghai Li, Ying Chen, Di Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery |
title | Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery |
title_full | Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery |
title_fullStr | Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery |
title_short | Short-Term Impact of Different Corneal Incision Positions on Postoperative Astigmatism and Visual Quality After SMILE Surgery |
title_sort | short-term impact of different corneal incision positions on postoperative astigmatism and visual quality after smile surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00748-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangshan shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT huangtianze shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT wangyuchen shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT ningken shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT longqing shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT wangzhonghai shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT liying shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery AT chendi shorttermimpactofdifferentcornealincisionpositionsonpostoperativeastigmatismandvisualqualityaftersmilesurgery |