Cargando…
Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
BACKGROUND: Although the recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) number in rectal cancer (RC) is 12, this standard remains controversial because of insufficient evidence. We aimed to refine this definition by quantifying the relationship between ELN number, stage migration and long-term surviv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320 |
_version_ | 1785093525092696064 |
---|---|
author | Guan, Xu Jiao, Shuai Wen, Rongbo Yu, Guanyu Liu, Jungang Miao, Dazhuang Wei, Ran Zhang, Weiyuan Hao, Liqiang Zhou, Leqi Lou, Zheng Liu, Shucheng Zhao, Enliang Wang, Guiyu Zhang, Wei Wang, Xishan |
author_facet | Guan, Xu Jiao, Shuai Wen, Rongbo Yu, Guanyu Liu, Jungang Miao, Dazhuang Wei, Ran Zhang, Weiyuan Hao, Liqiang Zhou, Leqi Lou, Zheng Liu, Shucheng Zhao, Enliang Wang, Guiyu Zhang, Wei Wang, Xishan |
author_sort | Guan, Xu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) number in rectal cancer (RC) is 12, this standard remains controversial because of insufficient evidence. We aimed to refine this definition by quantifying the relationship between ELN number, stage migration and long-term survival in RC. METHODS: Data from a Chinese multi-institutional registry (2009-2018) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2008-2017) on stages I–III resected RC were analysed to determine the relationship between ELN count, stage migration, and overall survival (OS) using multivariable models. The series of odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive node stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival with more ELNs were fitted using a Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) smoother, and structural breakpoints were determined using the Chow test. The relationship between ELN and survival was evaluated on a continuous scale using restricted cubic splines (RCS). RESULTS: The distribution of ELN count between the Chinese registry (n=7694) and SEER database (n=21 332) was similar. With increasing ELN count, both cohorts exhibited significant proportional increases from node-negative to node-positive disease (SEER, OR, 1.012, P<0.001; Chinese registry, OR, 1.016, P=0.014) and serial improvements in OS (SEER: HR, 0.982; Chinese registry: HR, 0.975; both P<0.001) after controlling for confounders. Cut-point analysis showed an optimal threshold ELN count of 15, which was validated in the two cohorts, with the ability to properly discriminate probabilities of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A higher ELN count is associated with more precise nodal staging and better survival. Our results robustly conclude that 15 ELNs are the optimal cut-off point for evaluating the quality of lymph node examination and stratification of prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10442141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104421412023-08-22 Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study Guan, Xu Jiao, Shuai Wen, Rongbo Yu, Guanyu Liu, Jungang Miao, Dazhuang Wei, Ran Zhang, Weiyuan Hao, Liqiang Zhou, Leqi Lou, Zheng Liu, Shucheng Zhao, Enliang Wang, Guiyu Zhang, Wei Wang, Xishan Int J Surg Original Research BACKGROUND: Although the recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) number in rectal cancer (RC) is 12, this standard remains controversial because of insufficient evidence. We aimed to refine this definition by quantifying the relationship between ELN number, stage migration and long-term survival in RC. METHODS: Data from a Chinese multi-institutional registry (2009-2018) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2008-2017) on stages I–III resected RC were analysed to determine the relationship between ELN count, stage migration, and overall survival (OS) using multivariable models. The series of odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive node stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival with more ELNs were fitted using a Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) smoother, and structural breakpoints were determined using the Chow test. The relationship between ELN and survival was evaluated on a continuous scale using restricted cubic splines (RCS). RESULTS: The distribution of ELN count between the Chinese registry (n=7694) and SEER database (n=21 332) was similar. With increasing ELN count, both cohorts exhibited significant proportional increases from node-negative to node-positive disease (SEER, OR, 1.012, P<0.001; Chinese registry, OR, 1.016, P=0.014) and serial improvements in OS (SEER: HR, 0.982; Chinese registry: HR, 0.975; both P<0.001) after controlling for confounders. Cut-point analysis showed an optimal threshold ELN count of 15, which was validated in the two cohorts, with the ability to properly discriminate probabilities of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A higher ELN count is associated with more precise nodal staging and better survival. Our results robustly conclude that 15 ELNs are the optimal cut-off point for evaluating the quality of lymph node examination and stratification of prognosis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10442141/ /pubmed/37428195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Guan, Xu Jiao, Shuai Wen, Rongbo Yu, Guanyu Liu, Jungang Miao, Dazhuang Wei, Ran Zhang, Weiyuan Hao, Liqiang Zhou, Leqi Lou, Zheng Liu, Shucheng Zhao, Enliang Wang, Guiyu Zhang, Wei Wang, Xishan Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
title | Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
title_full | Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
title_fullStr | Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
title_short | Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
title_sort | optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guanxu optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT jiaoshuai optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT wenrongbo optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT yuguanyu optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT liujungang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT miaodazhuang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT weiran optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT zhangweiyuan optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT haoliqiang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT zhouleqi optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT louzheng optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT liushucheng optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT zhaoenliang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT wangguiyu optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT zhangwei optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy AT wangxishan optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy |