Cargando…

Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND: Although the recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) number in rectal cancer (RC) is 12, this standard remains controversial because of insufficient evidence. We aimed to refine this definition by quantifying the relationship between ELN number, stage migration and long-term surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guan, Xu, Jiao, Shuai, Wen, Rongbo, Yu, Guanyu, Liu, Jungang, Miao, Dazhuang, Wei, Ran, Zhang, Weiyuan, Hao, Liqiang, Zhou, Leqi, Lou, Zheng, Liu, Shucheng, Zhao, Enliang, Wang, Guiyu, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Xishan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320
_version_ 1785093525092696064
author Guan, Xu
Jiao, Shuai
Wen, Rongbo
Yu, Guanyu
Liu, Jungang
Miao, Dazhuang
Wei, Ran
Zhang, Weiyuan
Hao, Liqiang
Zhou, Leqi
Lou, Zheng
Liu, Shucheng
Zhao, Enliang
Wang, Guiyu
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Xishan
author_facet Guan, Xu
Jiao, Shuai
Wen, Rongbo
Yu, Guanyu
Liu, Jungang
Miao, Dazhuang
Wei, Ran
Zhang, Weiyuan
Hao, Liqiang
Zhou, Leqi
Lou, Zheng
Liu, Shucheng
Zhao, Enliang
Wang, Guiyu
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Xishan
author_sort Guan, Xu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) number in rectal cancer (RC) is 12, this standard remains controversial because of insufficient evidence. We aimed to refine this definition by quantifying the relationship between ELN number, stage migration and long-term survival in RC. METHODS: Data from a Chinese multi-institutional registry (2009-2018) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2008-2017) on stages I–III resected RC were analysed to determine the relationship between ELN count, stage migration, and overall survival (OS) using multivariable models. The series of odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive node stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival with more ELNs were fitted using a Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) smoother, and structural breakpoints were determined using the Chow test. The relationship between ELN and survival was evaluated on a continuous scale using restricted cubic splines (RCS). RESULTS: The distribution of ELN count between the Chinese registry (n=7694) and SEER database (n=21 332) was similar. With increasing ELN count, both cohorts exhibited significant proportional increases from node-negative to node-positive disease (SEER, OR, 1.012, P<0.001; Chinese registry, OR, 1.016, P=0.014) and serial improvements in OS (SEER: HR, 0.982; Chinese registry: HR, 0.975; both P<0.001) after controlling for confounders. Cut-point analysis showed an optimal threshold ELN count of 15, which was validated in the two cohorts, with the ability to properly discriminate probabilities of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A higher ELN count is associated with more precise nodal staging and better survival. Our results robustly conclude that 15 ELNs are the optimal cut-off point for evaluating the quality of lymph node examination and stratification of prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10442141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104421412023-08-22 Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study Guan, Xu Jiao, Shuai Wen, Rongbo Yu, Guanyu Liu, Jungang Miao, Dazhuang Wei, Ran Zhang, Weiyuan Hao, Liqiang Zhou, Leqi Lou, Zheng Liu, Shucheng Zhao, Enliang Wang, Guiyu Zhang, Wei Wang, Xishan Int J Surg Original Research BACKGROUND: Although the recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) number in rectal cancer (RC) is 12, this standard remains controversial because of insufficient evidence. We aimed to refine this definition by quantifying the relationship between ELN number, stage migration and long-term survival in RC. METHODS: Data from a Chinese multi-institutional registry (2009-2018) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2008-2017) on stages I–III resected RC were analysed to determine the relationship between ELN count, stage migration, and overall survival (OS) using multivariable models. The series of odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive node stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival with more ELNs were fitted using a Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) smoother, and structural breakpoints were determined using the Chow test. The relationship between ELN and survival was evaluated on a continuous scale using restricted cubic splines (RCS). RESULTS: The distribution of ELN count between the Chinese registry (n=7694) and SEER database (n=21 332) was similar. With increasing ELN count, both cohorts exhibited significant proportional increases from node-negative to node-positive disease (SEER, OR, 1.012, P<0.001; Chinese registry, OR, 1.016, P=0.014) and serial improvements in OS (SEER: HR, 0.982; Chinese registry: HR, 0.975; both P<0.001) after controlling for confounders. Cut-point analysis showed an optimal threshold ELN count of 15, which was validated in the two cohorts, with the ability to properly discriminate probabilities of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A higher ELN count is associated with more precise nodal staging and better survival. Our results robustly conclude that 15 ELNs are the optimal cut-off point for evaluating the quality of lymph node examination and stratification of prognosis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10442141/ /pubmed/37428195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Guan, Xu
Jiao, Shuai
Wen, Rongbo
Yu, Guanyu
Liu, Jungang
Miao, Dazhuang
Wei, Ran
Zhang, Weiyuan
Hao, Liqiang
Zhou, Leqi
Lou, Zheng
Liu, Shucheng
Zhao, Enliang
Wang, Guiyu
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Xishan
Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
title Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
title_full Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
title_fullStr Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
title_short Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
title_sort optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320
work_keys_str_mv AT guanxu optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT jiaoshuai optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT wenrongbo optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT yuguanyu optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT liujungang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT miaodazhuang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT weiran optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhangweiyuan optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT haoliqiang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhouleqi optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT louzheng optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT liushucheng optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhaoenliang optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT wangguiyu optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhangwei optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT wangxishan optimalexaminedlymphnodenumberforaccuratestagingandlongtermsurvivalinrectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy