Cargando…

Frequency of acute vasodilator response (AVR) in incident and prevalent patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from the pulmonary vascular disease phenomics study

The prevalence of acute vasodilator response (AVR) to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) during right heart catheterization (RHC) is 12% in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). AVR, however, is reportedly lower in other disease‐associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), such as connecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naranjo, Mario, Rosenzweig, Erika B., Hemnes, Anna R., Jacob, Miriam, Desai, Ankit, Hill, Nicholas S., Larive, A. Brett, Finet, J. Emanuel, Leopold, Jane, Horn, Evelyn, Frantz, Robert, Rischard, Franz, Erzurum, Serpil, Beck, Gerald, Mathai, Stephen C., Hassoun, Paul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12281
Descripción
Sumario:The prevalence of acute vasodilator response (AVR) to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) during right heart catheterization (RHC) is 12% in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). AVR, however, is reportedly lower in other disease‐associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), such as connective tissue disease (CTD). The prevalence of AVR in patients on PAH therapy (prevalent cases) is unknown. We sought to determine AVR prevalence in Group 1 PH in the PVDOMICS cohort of incident and prevalent patients undergoing RHC. AVR was measured in response to 100% O(2) and O(2) plus iNO, with positivity defined as (1) decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) by ≥10 mmHg to a value ≤40 mmHg, with no change or an increase in cardiac output (definition 1); or (2) decrease in mPAP by ≥12% and pulmonary vascular resistance by ≥30% (definition 2). AVR rates and cumulative survival were compared between incident and prevalent patients. In 338 mainly prevalent (86%) patients, positive AVR to O(2)‐only was <2%, and 5.1% to 16.9%, based on definition 1 and 2 criteria, respectively; following O(2) + iNO. IPAH AVR prevalence (4.1%–18.7%) was similar to prior reports. AVR positivity was 7.7% to 15.4% in mostly CTD‐PAH prevalent cases, and 2.6% to 11.8% in other PAH groups. Survival was 89% in AVR responders versus 77% in nonresponders from PAH diagnosis, and 91% versus 86% from PVDOMICS enrollment (log‐rank test p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, AVR in IPAH patients is similar to prior studies. AVR in non‐IPAH patients was higher than previously reported. The relationship between PAH therapy, AVR response, and survival warrants further investigation.