Cargando…
Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). OBJECTIVES: The authors aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013 |
_version_ | 1785093697827766272 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Ko Shiomi, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Miyazawa, Akiyoshi Watanabe, Hiroki Nakamura, Sunao Suwa, Satoru Domei, Takenori Ono, Koh Sakamoto, Hiroki Shigetoshi, Masataka Taniguchi, Ryoji Okayama, Hideki Toyota, Toshiaki Yokomatsu, Takafumi Muto, Masahiro Kawaguchi, Ren Kishi, Koichi Hadase, Mitsuyoshi Fujita, Tsutomu Nishida, Yasunori Nishino, Masami Otake, Hiromasa Natsuaki, Masahiro Watanabe, Hirotoshi Suematsu, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Kengo Abe, Mitsuru Hibi, Kiyoshi Kadota, Kazushige Ando, Kenji Kimura, Takeshi |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Ko Shiomi, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Miyazawa, Akiyoshi Watanabe, Hiroki Nakamura, Sunao Suwa, Satoru Domei, Takenori Ono, Koh Sakamoto, Hiroki Shigetoshi, Masataka Taniguchi, Ryoji Okayama, Hideki Toyota, Toshiaki Yokomatsu, Takafumi Muto, Masahiro Kawaguchi, Ren Kishi, Koichi Hadase, Mitsuyoshi Fujita, Tsutomu Nishida, Yasunori Nishino, Masami Otake, Hiromasa Natsuaki, Masahiro Watanabe, Hirotoshi Suematsu, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Kengo Abe, Mitsuru Hibi, Kiyoshi Kadota, Kazushige Ando, Kenji Kimura, Takeshi |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Ko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to compare single-session vs staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI in patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS. METHODS: The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolling 1,021 patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified OPTIVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared single-session vs staged multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. RESULTS: There were 246 patients (24.1%) undergoing single-session multivessel PCI, and 775 patients (75.9%) undergoing staged multivessel PCI. There was a wide variation in the prevalence of single-session multivessel PCI across the participating centers. The staged multivessel PCI group more often had complex coronary anatomy such as 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion, and calcified lesions requiring an atherectomy device compared with the single-session multivessel PCI group. The rates of PCI success, procedural complications, and meeting OPTIVUS criteria were not different between groups. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was not different between single-session and staged multivessel PCI groups (9.0% vs 10.8%, log-rank P = 0.42). After adjusting confounders, the effect of single-session multivessel PCI relative to staged multivessel PCI was not significant for the primary endpoint (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.58-1.55; P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Single-session and staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI had similar 1-year outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10442883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104428832023-08-23 Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS Yamamoto, Ko Shiomi, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Miyazawa, Akiyoshi Watanabe, Hiroki Nakamura, Sunao Suwa, Satoru Domei, Takenori Ono, Koh Sakamoto, Hiroki Shigetoshi, Masataka Taniguchi, Ryoji Okayama, Hideki Toyota, Toshiaki Yokomatsu, Takafumi Muto, Masahiro Kawaguchi, Ren Kishi, Koichi Hadase, Mitsuyoshi Fujita, Tsutomu Nishida, Yasunori Nishino, Masami Otake, Hiromasa Natsuaki, Masahiro Watanabe, Hirotoshi Suematsu, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Kengo Abe, Mitsuru Hibi, Kiyoshi Kadota, Kazushige Ando, Kenji Kimura, Takeshi JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to compare single-session vs staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI in patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS. METHODS: The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolling 1,021 patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified OPTIVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared single-session vs staged multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. RESULTS: There were 246 patients (24.1%) undergoing single-session multivessel PCI, and 775 patients (75.9%) undergoing staged multivessel PCI. There was a wide variation in the prevalence of single-session multivessel PCI across the participating centers. The staged multivessel PCI group more often had complex coronary anatomy such as 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion, and calcified lesions requiring an atherectomy device compared with the single-session multivessel PCI group. The rates of PCI success, procedural complications, and meeting OPTIVUS criteria were not different between groups. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was not different between single-session and staged multivessel PCI groups (9.0% vs 10.8%, log-rank P = 0.42). After adjusting confounders, the effect of single-session multivessel PCI relative to staged multivessel PCI was not significant for the primary endpoint (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.58-1.55; P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Single-session and staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI had similar 1-year outcomes. Elsevier 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10442883/ /pubmed/37614540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yamamoto, Ko Shiomi, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Miyazawa, Akiyoshi Watanabe, Hiroki Nakamura, Sunao Suwa, Satoru Domei, Takenori Ono, Koh Sakamoto, Hiroki Shigetoshi, Masataka Taniguchi, Ryoji Okayama, Hideki Toyota, Toshiaki Yokomatsu, Takafumi Muto, Masahiro Kawaguchi, Ren Kishi, Koichi Hadase, Mitsuyoshi Fujita, Tsutomu Nishida, Yasunori Nishino, Masami Otake, Hiromasa Natsuaki, Masahiro Watanabe, Hirotoshi Suematsu, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Kengo Abe, Mitsuru Hibi, Kiyoshi Kadota, Kazushige Ando, Kenji Kimura, Takeshi Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS |
title | Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS |
title_full | Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS |
title_fullStr | Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS |
title_short | Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS |
title_sort | single-session versus staged multivessel optimal ivus-guided pci in patients with ccs or nste-acs |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotoko singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT shiomihiroki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT morimototakeshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT miyazawaakiyoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT watanabehiroki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT nakamurasunao singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT suwasatoru singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT domeitakenori singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT onokoh singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT sakamotohiroki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT shigetoshimasataka singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT taniguchiryoji singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT okayamahideki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT toyotatoshiaki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT yokomatsutakafumi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT mutomasahiro singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT kawaguchiren singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT kishikoichi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT hadasemitsuyoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT fujitatsutomu singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT nishidayasunori singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT nishinomasami singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT otakehiromasa singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT natsuakimasahiro singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT watanabehirotoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT suematsunobuhiro singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT tanabekengo singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT abemitsuru singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT hibikiyoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT kadotakazushige singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT andokenji singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT kimuratakeshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs AT singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs |