Cargando…

Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS

BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). OBJECTIVES: The authors aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Ko, Shiomi, Hiroki, Morimoto, Takeshi, Miyazawa, Akiyoshi, Watanabe, Hiroki, Nakamura, Sunao, Suwa, Satoru, Domei, Takenori, Ono, Koh, Sakamoto, Hiroki, Shigetoshi, Masataka, Taniguchi, Ryoji, Okayama, Hideki, Toyota, Toshiaki, Yokomatsu, Takafumi, Muto, Masahiro, Kawaguchi, Ren, Kishi, Koichi, Hadase, Mitsuyoshi, Fujita, Tsutomu, Nishida, Yasunori, Nishino, Masami, Otake, Hiromasa, Natsuaki, Masahiro, Watanabe, Hirotoshi, Suematsu, Nobuhiro, Tanabe, Kengo, Abe, Mitsuru, Hibi, Kiyoshi, Kadota, Kazushige, Ando, Kenji, Kimura, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013
_version_ 1785093697827766272
author Yamamoto, Ko
Shiomi, Hiroki
Morimoto, Takeshi
Miyazawa, Akiyoshi
Watanabe, Hiroki
Nakamura, Sunao
Suwa, Satoru
Domei, Takenori
Ono, Koh
Sakamoto, Hiroki
Shigetoshi, Masataka
Taniguchi, Ryoji
Okayama, Hideki
Toyota, Toshiaki
Yokomatsu, Takafumi
Muto, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Ren
Kishi, Koichi
Hadase, Mitsuyoshi
Fujita, Tsutomu
Nishida, Yasunori
Nishino, Masami
Otake, Hiromasa
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Watanabe, Hirotoshi
Suematsu, Nobuhiro
Tanabe, Kengo
Abe, Mitsuru
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Kadota, Kazushige
Ando, Kenji
Kimura, Takeshi
author_facet Yamamoto, Ko
Shiomi, Hiroki
Morimoto, Takeshi
Miyazawa, Akiyoshi
Watanabe, Hiroki
Nakamura, Sunao
Suwa, Satoru
Domei, Takenori
Ono, Koh
Sakamoto, Hiroki
Shigetoshi, Masataka
Taniguchi, Ryoji
Okayama, Hideki
Toyota, Toshiaki
Yokomatsu, Takafumi
Muto, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Ren
Kishi, Koichi
Hadase, Mitsuyoshi
Fujita, Tsutomu
Nishida, Yasunori
Nishino, Masami
Otake, Hiromasa
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Watanabe, Hirotoshi
Suematsu, Nobuhiro
Tanabe, Kengo
Abe, Mitsuru
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Kadota, Kazushige
Ando, Kenji
Kimura, Takeshi
author_sort Yamamoto, Ko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to compare single-session vs staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI in patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS. METHODS: The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolling 1,021 patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified OPTIVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared single-session vs staged multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. RESULTS: There were 246 patients (24.1%) undergoing single-session multivessel PCI, and 775 patients (75.9%) undergoing staged multivessel PCI. There was a wide variation in the prevalence of single-session multivessel PCI across the participating centers. The staged multivessel PCI group more often had complex coronary anatomy such as 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion, and calcified lesions requiring an atherectomy device compared with the single-session multivessel PCI group. The rates of PCI success, procedural complications, and meeting OPTIVUS criteria were not different between groups. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was not different between single-session and staged multivessel PCI groups (9.0% vs 10.8%, log-rank P = 0.42). After adjusting confounders, the effect of single-session multivessel PCI relative to staged multivessel PCI was not significant for the primary endpoint (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.58-1.55; P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Single-session and staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI had similar 1-year outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10442883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104428832023-08-23 Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS Yamamoto, Ko Shiomi, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Miyazawa, Akiyoshi Watanabe, Hiroki Nakamura, Sunao Suwa, Satoru Domei, Takenori Ono, Koh Sakamoto, Hiroki Shigetoshi, Masataka Taniguchi, Ryoji Okayama, Hideki Toyota, Toshiaki Yokomatsu, Takafumi Muto, Masahiro Kawaguchi, Ren Kishi, Koichi Hadase, Mitsuyoshi Fujita, Tsutomu Nishida, Yasunori Nishino, Masami Otake, Hiromasa Natsuaki, Masahiro Watanabe, Hirotoshi Suematsu, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Kengo Abe, Mitsuru Hibi, Kiyoshi Kadota, Kazushige Ando, Kenji Kimura, Takeshi JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to compare single-session vs staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI in patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS. METHODS: The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolling 1,021 patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified OPTIVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared single-session vs staged multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. RESULTS: There were 246 patients (24.1%) undergoing single-session multivessel PCI, and 775 patients (75.9%) undergoing staged multivessel PCI. There was a wide variation in the prevalence of single-session multivessel PCI across the participating centers. The staged multivessel PCI group more often had complex coronary anatomy such as 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion, and calcified lesions requiring an atherectomy device compared with the single-session multivessel PCI group. The rates of PCI success, procedural complications, and meeting OPTIVUS criteria were not different between groups. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was not different between single-session and staged multivessel PCI groups (9.0% vs 10.8%, log-rank P = 0.42). After adjusting confounders, the effect of single-session multivessel PCI relative to staged multivessel PCI was not significant for the primary endpoint (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.58-1.55; P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Single-session and staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI had similar 1-year outcomes. Elsevier 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10442883/ /pubmed/37614540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yamamoto, Ko
Shiomi, Hiroki
Morimoto, Takeshi
Miyazawa, Akiyoshi
Watanabe, Hiroki
Nakamura, Sunao
Suwa, Satoru
Domei, Takenori
Ono, Koh
Sakamoto, Hiroki
Shigetoshi, Masataka
Taniguchi, Ryoji
Okayama, Hideki
Toyota, Toshiaki
Yokomatsu, Takafumi
Muto, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Ren
Kishi, Koichi
Hadase, Mitsuyoshi
Fujita, Tsutomu
Nishida, Yasunori
Nishino, Masami
Otake, Hiromasa
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Watanabe, Hirotoshi
Suematsu, Nobuhiro
Tanabe, Kengo
Abe, Mitsuru
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Kadota, Kazushige
Ando, Kenji
Kimura, Takeshi
Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
title Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
title_full Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
title_fullStr Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
title_full_unstemmed Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
title_short Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
title_sort single-session versus staged multivessel optimal ivus-guided pci in patients with ccs or nste-acs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotoko singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT shiomihiroki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT morimototakeshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT miyazawaakiyoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT watanabehiroki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT nakamurasunao singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT suwasatoru singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT domeitakenori singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT onokoh singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT sakamotohiroki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT shigetoshimasataka singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT taniguchiryoji singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT okayamahideki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT toyotatoshiaki singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT yokomatsutakafumi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT mutomasahiro singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT kawaguchiren singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT kishikoichi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT hadasemitsuyoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT fujitatsutomu singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT nishidayasunori singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT nishinomasami singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT otakehiromasa singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT natsuakimasahiro singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT watanabehirotoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT suematsunobuhiro singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT tanabekengo singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT abemitsuru singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT hibikiyoshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT kadotakazushige singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT andokenji singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT kimuratakeshi singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs
AT singlesessionversusstagedmultivesseloptimalivusguidedpciinpatientswithccsornsteacs