Cargando…
Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy
Background and study aims In gastrointestinal endoscopy, biopsies must transit through the accessory channel and cap, presenting an opportunity for loss of tissue. We sought to determine the incidence of specimen retention in the accessory channel or cap and identify procedure characteristics associ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2098-2470 |
_version_ | 1785093719403266048 |
---|---|
author | Toy, Gregory Colletier, Keegan Hale, Gillian Valentine, John Gawron, Andrew J Sossenheimer, Michael Peterson, Kathryn Aparicio, Rodrigo Fang, John C |
author_facet | Toy, Gregory Colletier, Keegan Hale, Gillian Valentine, John Gawron, Andrew J Sossenheimer, Michael Peterson, Kathryn Aparicio, Rodrigo Fang, John C |
author_sort | Toy, Gregory |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims In gastrointestinal endoscopy, biopsies must transit through the accessory channel and cap, presenting an opportunity for loss of tissue. We sought to determine the incidence of specimen retention in the accessory channel or cap and identify procedure characteristics associated with specimen retention. Patients and methods After completion of standard endoscopic procedures in which biopsies were obtained, the biopsy cap and accessory channel were inspected, brushed, and irrigated for any retained biopsy specimens according to a standard protocol. For controls, the same protocol was applied to procedures in which biopsies were not obtained. Specimen bottles from the recovery protocol were sent for pathological examination regardless of whether any visible tissue was present. Results A total of 216 outpatient procedures were included: 55 esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) and 50 colonoscopies in which biopsies were obtained and 56 EGDs and 55 colonoscopies in the control group. Retained specimens were found in either the cap or channel in 50 of 105 (48%). In 20 of 105 (19%), retained specimens were found just in the cap, in six of 105 (5.7%), retained specimens were found just in the channel, while in 24 of 105 (23%), retained specimens were found in both the cap and channel. Retained specimens were more likely to be found in EGDs compared to colonoscopies (58% vs. 36%, P = 0.031). No retained specimens were found in the control group. Conclusions Retained specimens are startingly common in standard gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures and could potentially change diagnoses and management. Quality improvement measures should be instituted to monitor prevalence of retained biopsies and methods to prevent them should be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10442972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104429722023-08-23 Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy Toy, Gregory Colletier, Keegan Hale, Gillian Valentine, John Gawron, Andrew J Sossenheimer, Michael Peterson, Kathryn Aparicio, Rodrigo Fang, John C Endosc Int Open Background and study aims In gastrointestinal endoscopy, biopsies must transit through the accessory channel and cap, presenting an opportunity for loss of tissue. We sought to determine the incidence of specimen retention in the accessory channel or cap and identify procedure characteristics associated with specimen retention. Patients and methods After completion of standard endoscopic procedures in which biopsies were obtained, the biopsy cap and accessory channel were inspected, brushed, and irrigated for any retained biopsy specimens according to a standard protocol. For controls, the same protocol was applied to procedures in which biopsies were not obtained. Specimen bottles from the recovery protocol were sent for pathological examination regardless of whether any visible tissue was present. Results A total of 216 outpatient procedures were included: 55 esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) and 50 colonoscopies in which biopsies were obtained and 56 EGDs and 55 colonoscopies in the control group. Retained specimens were found in either the cap or channel in 50 of 105 (48%). In 20 of 105 (19%), retained specimens were found just in the cap, in six of 105 (5.7%), retained specimens were found just in the channel, while in 24 of 105 (23%), retained specimens were found in both the cap and channel. Retained specimens were more likely to be found in EGDs compared to colonoscopies (58% vs. 36%, P = 0.031). No retained specimens were found in the control group. Conclusions Retained specimens are startingly common in standard gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures and could potentially change diagnoses and management. Quality improvement measures should be instituted to monitor prevalence of retained biopsies and methods to prevent them should be developed. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10442972/ /pubmed/37614326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2098-2470 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Toy, Gregory Colletier, Keegan Hale, Gillian Valentine, John Gawron, Andrew J Sossenheimer, Michael Peterson, Kathryn Aparicio, Rodrigo Fang, John C Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
title | Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
title_full | Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
title_short | Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
title_sort | incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2098-2470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toygregory incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT colletierkeegan incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT halegillian incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT valentinejohn incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT gawronandrewj incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT sossenheimermichael incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT petersonkathryn incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT apariciorodrigo incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy AT fangjohnc incidenceofretainedbiopsyspecimensafteresophagogastroduodenoscopyandcolonoscopy |