Cargando…

Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?

BACKGROUND: For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazıcı, Hilmi, Uçar, Ahmet Deniz, Namdaroglu, Ozan, Yıldırım, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652868
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540
_version_ 1785093726766366720
author Yazıcı, Hilmi
Uçar, Ahmet Deniz
Namdaroglu, Ozan
Yıldırım, Mehmet
author_facet Yazıcı, Hilmi
Uçar, Ahmet Deniz
Namdaroglu, Ozan
Yıldırım, Mehmet
author_sort Yazıcı, Hilmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances of this models and define the optimal one for our patient population. METHODS: Variables analyzed were age, gender, burn type, total burned surface area (TBSA), total partial thickness burn area, total full thickness burn area, inhalation injuries, mechanical ventilation supports, blood products usage, total scores of Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), revised Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Fatality by Longevity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Measured Extent of burn and Sex (FLAMES) and APACHE II, and their relations with mortality. RESULTS: In our study, a statistically significant relationship was found with mortality between age, TBSA, full thickness burn percentage, inhalation injury, burn type, and it was similar to literature. Female gender was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality. CONCLUSION: We compared several burn mortality scoring systems and their predictional mortality rates. ABSI scores of patients for estimated mortality rates were similar to our mortality rate. Consequently, it was thought that ABSI was included all mortality-related parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104430022023-08-23 Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? Yazıcı, Hilmi Uçar, Ahmet Deniz Namdaroglu, Ozan Yıldırım, Mehmet Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances of this models and define the optimal one for our patient population. METHODS: Variables analyzed were age, gender, burn type, total burned surface area (TBSA), total partial thickness burn area, total full thickness burn area, inhalation injuries, mechanical ventilation supports, blood products usage, total scores of Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), revised Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Fatality by Longevity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Measured Extent of burn and Sex (FLAMES) and APACHE II, and their relations with mortality. RESULTS: In our study, a statistically significant relationship was found with mortality between age, TBSA, full thickness burn percentage, inhalation injury, burn type, and it was similar to literature. Female gender was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality. CONCLUSION: We compared several burn mortality scoring systems and their predictional mortality rates. ABSI scores of patients for estimated mortality rates were similar to our mortality rate. Consequently, it was thought that ABSI was included all mortality-related parameters. Kare Publishing 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10443002/ /pubmed/35652868 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540 Text en Copyright © 2022 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Yazıcı, Hilmi
Uçar, Ahmet Deniz
Namdaroglu, Ozan
Yıldırım, Mehmet
Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
title Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
title_full Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
title_fullStr Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
title_full_unstemmed Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
title_short Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
title_sort mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: which one is the best?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652868
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540
work_keys_str_mv AT yazıcıhilmi mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest
AT ucarahmetdeniz mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest
AT namdarogluozan mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest
AT yıldırımmehmet mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest