Cargando…
Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?
BACKGROUND: For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652868 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540 |
_version_ | 1785093726766366720 |
---|---|
author | Yazıcı, Hilmi Uçar, Ahmet Deniz Namdaroglu, Ozan Yıldırım, Mehmet |
author_facet | Yazıcı, Hilmi Uçar, Ahmet Deniz Namdaroglu, Ozan Yıldırım, Mehmet |
author_sort | Yazıcı, Hilmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances of this models and define the optimal one for our patient population. METHODS: Variables analyzed were age, gender, burn type, total burned surface area (TBSA), total partial thickness burn area, total full thickness burn area, inhalation injuries, mechanical ventilation supports, blood products usage, total scores of Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), revised Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Fatality by Longevity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Measured Extent of burn and Sex (FLAMES) and APACHE II, and their relations with mortality. RESULTS: In our study, a statistically significant relationship was found with mortality between age, TBSA, full thickness burn percentage, inhalation injury, burn type, and it was similar to literature. Female gender was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality. CONCLUSION: We compared several burn mortality scoring systems and their predictional mortality rates. ABSI scores of patients for estimated mortality rates were similar to our mortality rate. Consequently, it was thought that ABSI was included all mortality-related parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10443002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104430022023-08-23 Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? Yazıcı, Hilmi Uçar, Ahmet Deniz Namdaroglu, Ozan Yıldırım, Mehmet Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances of this models and define the optimal one for our patient population. METHODS: Variables analyzed were age, gender, burn type, total burned surface area (TBSA), total partial thickness burn area, total full thickness burn area, inhalation injuries, mechanical ventilation supports, blood products usage, total scores of Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), revised Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Fatality by Longevity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Measured Extent of burn and Sex (FLAMES) and APACHE II, and their relations with mortality. RESULTS: In our study, a statistically significant relationship was found with mortality between age, TBSA, full thickness burn percentage, inhalation injury, burn type, and it was similar to literature. Female gender was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality. CONCLUSION: We compared several burn mortality scoring systems and their predictional mortality rates. ABSI scores of patients for estimated mortality rates were similar to our mortality rate. Consequently, it was thought that ABSI was included all mortality-related parameters. Kare Publishing 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10443002/ /pubmed/35652868 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540 Text en Copyright © 2022 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yazıcı, Hilmi Uçar, Ahmet Deniz Namdaroglu, Ozan Yıldırım, Mehmet Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? |
title | Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? |
title_full | Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? |
title_fullStr | Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? |
title_full_unstemmed | Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? |
title_short | Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best? |
title_sort | mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: which one is the best? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652868 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yazıcıhilmi mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest AT ucarahmetdeniz mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest AT namdarogluozan mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest AT yıldırımmehmet mortalitypredictionmodelsforsevereburnpatientswhichoneisthebest |