Cargando…

Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge of 112 ambulance service staffers (doctors, nurses, emergency medical technicians [EMTs], and paramedics [PMs]) who were the first intervention to pediatric patients with burn injuries regarding first intervention and patient transfer. METHODS: The stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demir, Sabri, Bostancı, Süleyman Arif, Erturk, Ahmet, Öztorun, Can İhsan, Güney, Doğuş, Azili, Mujdem Nur, Şenel, Emrah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485521
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.91045
_version_ 1785093754961526784
author Demir, Sabri
Bostancı, Süleyman Arif
Erturk, Ahmet
Öztorun, Can İhsan
Güney, Doğuş
Azili, Mujdem Nur
Şenel, Emrah
author_facet Demir, Sabri
Bostancı, Süleyman Arif
Erturk, Ahmet
Öztorun, Can İhsan
Güney, Doğuş
Azili, Mujdem Nur
Şenel, Emrah
author_sort Demir, Sabri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge of 112 ambulance service staffers (doctors, nurses, emergency medical technicians [EMTs], and paramedics [PMs]) who were the first intervention to pediatric patients with burn injuries regarding first intervention and patient transfer. METHODS: The study included 373 personnel working in 112 ambulance services in Ankara province. Participants were asked 17 questions to measure their knowledge of burns in children. Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 21.0. RESULTS: Of the participants, 26 (7%) were doctors, 25 (6.7%) nurses, 180 (48.3%) EMTs, and 142 (35.3%) PMs. Of the participants, 118 stated that they always calculate the burn surface area, while only five (1.3%) marked the correct choice of the Lund Browder scheme to the question by which method they calculated. One hundred twenty one personnel (32.4%) use the Parkland formula to calculate the amount of fluid to be given during transfer while only 7 (1.9%) use the Galveston formula, which is more suitable for children. Of the participants, 56 (15%) answered as lactated Ringer’s solution which is the correct fluid to the question of which fluid do you give at the scene and during the transfer. One hundred fifty-three participants (41%) responded correctly to the scenario question expected to recognize inhalation damage while only 138 (37%) responded correctly as “I do immediately intubate” to the inhalation injury described scenario question. One out of 373 (0.3%) participants marked the appropriate procedure for a patient who had a 50% scald burn during the first intervention and transfer. The rate of topical lidocaine use of participants was high (70.8%). Of the 373 participants, only 33 (8.8%) thought themselves competent for first aid and transfer of children with burns. If training on the subject was held, 333 personnel (89.3%) wanted to participate. CONCLUSION: It is expected that the knowledge of 112 ambulance services who see pediatric burn patients first, perform the first intervention, and provide transfer would be suitable. However, our questionnaire shows that these personnel have insufficient knowledge and need to be trained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104431252023-08-23 Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment Demir, Sabri Bostancı, Süleyman Arif Erturk, Ahmet Öztorun, Can İhsan Güney, Doğuş Azili, Mujdem Nur Şenel, Emrah Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge of 112 ambulance service staffers (doctors, nurses, emergency medical technicians [EMTs], and paramedics [PMs]) who were the first intervention to pediatric patients with burn injuries regarding first intervention and patient transfer. METHODS: The study included 373 personnel working in 112 ambulance services in Ankara province. Participants were asked 17 questions to measure their knowledge of burns in children. Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 21.0. RESULTS: Of the participants, 26 (7%) were doctors, 25 (6.7%) nurses, 180 (48.3%) EMTs, and 142 (35.3%) PMs. Of the participants, 118 stated that they always calculate the burn surface area, while only five (1.3%) marked the correct choice of the Lund Browder scheme to the question by which method they calculated. One hundred twenty one personnel (32.4%) use the Parkland formula to calculate the amount of fluid to be given during transfer while only 7 (1.9%) use the Galveston formula, which is more suitable for children. Of the participants, 56 (15%) answered as lactated Ringer’s solution which is the correct fluid to the question of which fluid do you give at the scene and during the transfer. One hundred fifty-three participants (41%) responded correctly to the scenario question expected to recognize inhalation damage while only 138 (37%) responded correctly as “I do immediately intubate” to the inhalation injury described scenario question. One out of 373 (0.3%) participants marked the appropriate procedure for a patient who had a 50% scald burn during the first intervention and transfer. The rate of topical lidocaine use of participants was high (70.8%). Of the 373 participants, only 33 (8.8%) thought themselves competent for first aid and transfer of children with burns. If training on the subject was held, 333 personnel (89.3%) wanted to participate. CONCLUSION: It is expected that the knowledge of 112 ambulance services who see pediatric burn patients first, perform the first intervention, and provide transfer would be suitable. However, our questionnaire shows that these personnel have insufficient knowledge and need to be trained. Kare Publishing 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10443125/ /pubmed/35485521 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.91045 Text en Copyright © 2022 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Demir, Sabri
Bostancı, Süleyman Arif
Erturk, Ahmet
Öztorun, Can İhsan
Güney, Doğuş
Azili, Mujdem Nur
Şenel, Emrah
Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment
title Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment
title_full Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment
title_fullStr Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment
title_full_unstemmed Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment
title_short Approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: A survey assessment
title_sort approaches of 112 ambulance service staffers to children with burns: a survey assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485521
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.91045
work_keys_str_mv AT demirsabri approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment
AT bostancısuleymanarif approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment
AT erturkahmet approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment
AT oztoruncanihsan approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment
AT guneydogus approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment
AT azilimujdemnur approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment
AT senelemrah approachesof112ambulanceservicestafferstochildrenwithburnsasurveyassessment