Cargando…

Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity

The impacts of science are felt across all socio-ecological levels, ranging from the individual to societal. In order to adapt or respond to scientific discoveries, novel technologies, or biomedical or environmental challenges, a fundamental understanding of science is necessary. However, antiscient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swords, Christina M., Porter, Jerlym S., Hawkins, Amy J., Li, Edwin, Rowland-Goldsmith, Melissa, Koci, Matthew D., Tansey, John T., Woitowich, Nicole C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00037-23
_version_ 1785093799156908032
author Swords, Christina M.
Porter, Jerlym S.
Hawkins, Amy J.
Li, Edwin
Rowland-Goldsmith, Melissa
Koci, Matthew D.
Tansey, John T.
Woitowich, Nicole C.
author_facet Swords, Christina M.
Porter, Jerlym S.
Hawkins, Amy J.
Li, Edwin
Rowland-Goldsmith, Melissa
Koci, Matthew D.
Tansey, John T.
Woitowich, Nicole C.
author_sort Swords, Christina M.
collection PubMed
description The impacts of science are felt across all socio-ecological levels, ranging from the individual to societal. In order to adapt or respond to scientific discoveries, novel technologies, or biomedical or environmental challenges, a fundamental understanding of science is necessary. However, antiscientific rhetoric, mistrust in science, and the dissemination of misinformation hinder the promotion of science as a necessary and beneficial component of our world. Scientists can promote scientific literacy by establishing dialogues with nonexperts, but they may find a lack of formal training as a barrier to public engagement. To address this, the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) launched the Art of Science Communication course in 2015 in order to provide scientists at all career stages with introductory science communication training. In 2020, we conducted a retrospective survey of former participants to evaluate how the course had impacted participants’ science communication behaviors and their confidence engaging with nonexperts, as well as other benefits to their professional development. We found that scientists were significantly more likely to communicate with nonexpert audiences following the course compared to before (77% versus 51%; P < 0.0001). In addition, quantitative and qualitative data suggested that scientists were more confident in their ability to communicate science after completing the course (median of 8, standard deviation [SD] of 0.98 versus median of 5, SD of 1.57; P < 0.0001). Qualitative responses from participants supported quantitative findings. This suggested that the Art of Science Communication course is highly effective at improving the confidence of scientists to engage with the public and other nonexpert audiences regardless of career status. These data-driven perspectives provide a rationale for the implementation of broadly accessible science communication training programs that promote public engagement with science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104433072023-08-23 Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity Swords, Christina M. Porter, Jerlym S. Hawkins, Amy J. Li, Edwin Rowland-Goldsmith, Melissa Koci, Matthew D. Tansey, John T. Woitowich, Nicole C. J Microbiol Biol Educ Research Article The impacts of science are felt across all socio-ecological levels, ranging from the individual to societal. In order to adapt or respond to scientific discoveries, novel technologies, or biomedical or environmental challenges, a fundamental understanding of science is necessary. However, antiscientific rhetoric, mistrust in science, and the dissemination of misinformation hinder the promotion of science as a necessary and beneficial component of our world. Scientists can promote scientific literacy by establishing dialogues with nonexperts, but they may find a lack of formal training as a barrier to public engagement. To address this, the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) launched the Art of Science Communication course in 2015 in order to provide scientists at all career stages with introductory science communication training. In 2020, we conducted a retrospective survey of former participants to evaluate how the course had impacted participants’ science communication behaviors and their confidence engaging with nonexperts, as well as other benefits to their professional development. We found that scientists were significantly more likely to communicate with nonexpert audiences following the course compared to before (77% versus 51%; P < 0.0001). In addition, quantitative and qualitative data suggested that scientists were more confident in their ability to communicate science after completing the course (median of 8, standard deviation [SD] of 0.98 versus median of 5, SD of 1.57; P < 0.0001). Qualitative responses from participants supported quantitative findings. This suggested that the Art of Science Communication course is highly effective at improving the confidence of scientists to engage with the public and other nonexpert audiences regardless of career status. These data-driven perspectives provide a rationale for the implementation of broadly accessible science communication training programs that promote public engagement with science. American Society for Microbiology 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10443307/ /pubmed/37614888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00037-23 Text en Copyright © 2023 Swords et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Swords, Christina M.
Porter, Jerlym S.
Hawkins, Amy J.
Li, Edwin
Rowland-Goldsmith, Melissa
Koci, Matthew D.
Tansey, John T.
Woitowich, Nicole C.
Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity
title Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity
title_full Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity
title_fullStr Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity
title_full_unstemmed Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity
title_short Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity
title_sort science communication training imparts confidence and influences public engagement activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00037-23
work_keys_str_mv AT swordschristinam sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT porterjerlyms sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT hawkinsamyj sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT liedwin sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT rowlandgoldsmithmelissa sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT kocimatthewd sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT tanseyjohnt sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity
AT woitowichnicolec sciencecommunicationtrainingimpartsconfidenceandinfluencespublicengagementactivity