Cargando…

Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System

BACKGROUND: Small residual limb-socket displacement is a good indicator of prosthetic suspension system quality. Active vacuum suspension systems can decrease vertical movement inside the socket, compared to non-active suction systems. This study mechanically evaluated limb-socket displacement with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gholizadeh, H, Lemaire, ED, Salekrostam, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Online Publication Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614770
http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v2i2.32941
_version_ 1785093851550056448
author Gholizadeh, H
Lemaire, ED
Salekrostam, R
author_facet Gholizadeh, H
Lemaire, ED
Salekrostam, R
author_sort Gholizadeh, H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small residual limb-socket displacement is a good indicator of prosthetic suspension system quality. Active vacuum suspension systems can decrease vertical movement inside the socket, compared to non-active suction systems. This study mechanically evaluated limb-socket displacement with the Össur Unity active vacuum system. METHOD: Forty-eight conditions were evaluated: four cylindrical and four conical sockets (polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), thermoset resin (acrylic), Thermolyn soft materials); two Iceross Seal-In V liners (standard, high profile); three vacuum conditions (active vacuum, inactive vacuum, no suction with valve open). An Instron 4428 test machine applied 0-100N linear ramped tensile loads to each positive mold, with the socket secured in place, while displacement between the mold and socket was recorded. Following the displacement tests, the load before failure (i.e., 10 mm displacement) was measured. RESULTS: Average and standard deviations for movement between the mold and sockets were small. The displacement average for all conditions was 0.30±0.16mm for active vacuum, 0.32±0.16mm for inactive vacuum, and 0.39±0.22mm for no suction. Across all trials, active vacuum systems tolerated significantly (p<0.001) more load before failure (812±221N) compared to inactive vacuum (727±213N), and no suction (401±184N). The maximum load before failure (1142±53N) was for the cylindrical polypropylene socket and high-profile liner. CONCLUSION: The Unity system successfully controlled pistoning inside the socket for regular activity loads and also controlled the greatest traction loads. While relative movement was smallest for Unity, all conditions (inactive vacuum, no suction) were viable for loads less than 100N. Furthermore, similar results can be achieved when using different socket fabrication materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Canadian Online Publication Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104434972023-08-23 Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System Gholizadeh, H Lemaire, ED Salekrostam, R Can Prosthet Orthot J Research Articles BACKGROUND: Small residual limb-socket displacement is a good indicator of prosthetic suspension system quality. Active vacuum suspension systems can decrease vertical movement inside the socket, compared to non-active suction systems. This study mechanically evaluated limb-socket displacement with the Össur Unity active vacuum system. METHOD: Forty-eight conditions were evaluated: four cylindrical and four conical sockets (polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), thermoset resin (acrylic), Thermolyn soft materials); two Iceross Seal-In V liners (standard, high profile); three vacuum conditions (active vacuum, inactive vacuum, no suction with valve open). An Instron 4428 test machine applied 0-100N linear ramped tensile loads to each positive mold, with the socket secured in place, while displacement between the mold and socket was recorded. Following the displacement tests, the load before failure (i.e., 10 mm displacement) was measured. RESULTS: Average and standard deviations for movement between the mold and sockets were small. The displacement average for all conditions was 0.30±0.16mm for active vacuum, 0.32±0.16mm for inactive vacuum, and 0.39±0.22mm for no suction. Across all trials, active vacuum systems tolerated significantly (p<0.001) more load before failure (812±221N) compared to inactive vacuum (727±213N), and no suction (401±184N). The maximum load before failure (1142±53N) was for the cylindrical polypropylene socket and high-profile liner. CONCLUSION: The Unity system successfully controlled pistoning inside the socket for regular activity loads and also controlled the greatest traction loads. While relative movement was smallest for Unity, all conditions (inactive vacuum, no suction) were viable for loads less than 100N. Furthermore, similar results can be achieved when using different socket fabrication materials. Canadian Online Publication Group 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10443497/ /pubmed/37614770 http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v2i2.32941 Text en Copyright (c) 2020 Hossein Gholizadeh, Edward D Lemaire, Rasool Salekrostam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gholizadeh, H
Lemaire, ED
Salekrostam, R
Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System
title Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System
title_full Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System
title_fullStr Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System
title_short Mechanical Evaluation Of Unity Elevated Vacuum Suspension System
title_sort mechanical evaluation of unity elevated vacuum suspension system
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37614770
http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v2i2.32941
work_keys_str_mv AT gholizadehh mechanicalevaluationofunityelevatedvacuumsuspensionsystem
AT lemaireed mechanicalevaluationofunityelevatedvacuumsuspensionsystem
AT salekrostamr mechanicalevaluationofunityelevatedvacuumsuspensionsystem