Cargando…

A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant

Several obstacles must be overcome before preliminary cost-utility analyses (CUA) of prosthetic care innovations can be routinely performed. The basic framework of preliminary CUAs and hands- on recommendations suggested previously might contribute to wider adoption. However, a practical application...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guirao, L, Samitier, B, Frossard, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Online Publication Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37615003
http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36366
_version_ 1785093858861776896
author Guirao, L
Samitier, B
Frossard, L
author_facet Guirao, L
Samitier, B
Frossard, L
author_sort Guirao, L
collection PubMed
description Several obstacles must be overcome before preliminary cost-utility analyses (CUA) of prosthetic care innovations can be routinely performed. The basic framework of preliminary CUAs and hands- on recommendations suggested previously might contribute to wider adoption. However, a practical application for an emerging intervention is needed to showcase the capacity of this proposed preliminary CUA framework. This study presented the outcomes of preliminary CUA of the distal weight bearing Keep Walking Implant (KWI), an emerging prosthetic care innovation that may reduce socket fittings for individuals with transfemoral amputation. The preliminary CUAs compared the provision of prosthetic care without (usual intervention) and with the KWI (new intervention) using a 15-step iterative process focused on feasibility, constructs, analysis, and interpretations of outcomes from an Australia government prosthetic care perspective over a six-year time horizon. Baseline and incremental costs were extracted from schedules of allowable expenses. Baseline utilities were extracted from a study and converted into quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Incremental utilities were calculated based on sensible gains of QALY from baselines. The provision of the prosthetic care with the KWI could generate an indicative incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of −$36,890 per QALY, which was $76,890 per QALY below willingness-to-pay threshold, provided that the KWI reduces costs by $17,910 while increasing utility by 0.485 QALY compared to usual interventions. This preliminary CUA provided administrators of healthcare organizations in Australia and elsewhere with prerequisite evidence justifying further access to market and clinical introduction of the KWI. Altogether, this work suggests that the basic framework of the preliminary CUA of a prosthetic care innovation proposed previously is feasible and informative when a series of assumptions are carefully considered. This study further confirms that preliminary CUAs prosthetic care interventions might be a relevant alternative to full CUA for other medical treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Canadian Online Publication Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104435202023-08-23 A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant Guirao, L Samitier, B Frossard, L Can Prosthet Orthot J Stakeholder Perspectives Several obstacles must be overcome before preliminary cost-utility analyses (CUA) of prosthetic care innovations can be routinely performed. The basic framework of preliminary CUAs and hands- on recommendations suggested previously might contribute to wider adoption. However, a practical application for an emerging intervention is needed to showcase the capacity of this proposed preliminary CUA framework. This study presented the outcomes of preliminary CUA of the distal weight bearing Keep Walking Implant (KWI), an emerging prosthetic care innovation that may reduce socket fittings for individuals with transfemoral amputation. The preliminary CUAs compared the provision of prosthetic care without (usual intervention) and with the KWI (new intervention) using a 15-step iterative process focused on feasibility, constructs, analysis, and interpretations of outcomes from an Australia government prosthetic care perspective over a six-year time horizon. Baseline and incremental costs were extracted from schedules of allowable expenses. Baseline utilities were extracted from a study and converted into quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Incremental utilities were calculated based on sensible gains of QALY from baselines. The provision of the prosthetic care with the KWI could generate an indicative incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of −$36,890 per QALY, which was $76,890 per QALY below willingness-to-pay threshold, provided that the KWI reduces costs by $17,910 while increasing utility by 0.485 QALY compared to usual interventions. This preliminary CUA provided administrators of healthcare organizations in Australia and elsewhere with prerequisite evidence justifying further access to market and clinical introduction of the KWI. Altogether, this work suggests that the basic framework of the preliminary CUA of a prosthetic care innovation proposed previously is feasible and informative when a series of assumptions are carefully considered. This study further confirms that preliminary CUAs prosthetic care interventions might be a relevant alternative to full CUA for other medical treatments. Canadian Online Publication Group 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10443520/ /pubmed/37615003 http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36366 Text en Copyright (c) 2021 Guirao L, Samitier B, Frossard L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Stakeholder Perspectives
Guirao, L
Samitier, B
Frossard, L
A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant
title A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant
title_full A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant
title_fullStr A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant
title_full_unstemmed A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant
title_short A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant
title_sort preliminary cost-utility analysis of the prosthetic care innovations: case of the keep walking implant
topic Stakeholder Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37615003
http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36366
work_keys_str_mv AT guiraol apreliminarycostutilityanalysisoftheprostheticcareinnovationscaseofthekeepwalkingimplant
AT samitierb apreliminarycostutilityanalysisoftheprostheticcareinnovationscaseofthekeepwalkingimplant
AT frossardl apreliminarycostutilityanalysisoftheprostheticcareinnovationscaseofthekeepwalkingimplant
AT guiraol preliminarycostutilityanalysisoftheprostheticcareinnovationscaseofthekeepwalkingimplant
AT samitierb preliminarycostutilityanalysisoftheprostheticcareinnovationscaseofthekeepwalkingimplant
AT frossardl preliminarycostutilityanalysisoftheprostheticcareinnovationscaseofthekeepwalkingimplant