Cargando…

The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection

Alternation of generations in plant life cycle provides a biological basis for natural selection occurring in either the gametophyte or the sporophyte phase or in both. Divergent biphasic selection could yield distinct evolutionary rates for phase-specific or pleiotropic genes. Here, we analyze mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ling-Ling, Xiao, Yu, Wang, Xi, He, Zi-Han, Lv, Yan-Wen, Hu, Xin-Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evad151
_version_ 1785093899509825536
author Li, Ling-Ling
Xiao, Yu
Wang, Xi
He, Zi-Han
Lv, Yan-Wen
Hu, Xin-Sheng
author_facet Li, Ling-Ling
Xiao, Yu
Wang, Xi
He, Zi-Han
Lv, Yan-Wen
Hu, Xin-Sheng
author_sort Li, Ling-Ling
collection PubMed
description Alternation of generations in plant life cycle provides a biological basis for natural selection occurring in either the gametophyte or the sporophyte phase or in both. Divergent biphasic selection could yield distinct evolutionary rates for phase-specific or pleiotropic genes. Here, we analyze models that deal with antagonistic and synergistic selection between alternative generations in terms of the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous divergence (K(a)/K(s)). Effects of biphasic selection are opposite under antagonistic selection but cumulative under synergistic selection for pleiotropic genes. Under the additive and comparable strengths of biphasic allelic selection, the absolute K(a)/K(s) for the gametophyte gene is equal to in outcrossing but smaller than, in a mixed mating system, that for the sporophyte gene under antagonistic selection. The same pattern is predicted for K(a)/K(s) under synergistic selection. Selfing reduces efficacy of gametophytic selection. Other processes, including pollen and seed flow and genetic drift, reduce selection efficacy. The polymorphism (π(a)) at a nonsynonymous site is affected by the joint effects of selfing with gametophytic or sporophytic selection. Likewise, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphism (π(a)/π(s)) is also affected by the same joint effects. Gene flow and genetic drift have opposite effects on π(a) or π(a)/π(s) in interacting with gametophytic and sporophytic selection. We discuss implications of this theory for detecting natural selection in terms of K(a)/K(s) and for interpreting the evolutionary divergence among gametophyte-specific, sporophyte-specific, and pleiotropic genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104437362023-08-23 The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection Li, Ling-Ling Xiao, Yu Wang, Xi He, Zi-Han Lv, Yan-Wen Hu, Xin-Sheng Genome Biol Evol Article Alternation of generations in plant life cycle provides a biological basis for natural selection occurring in either the gametophyte or the sporophyte phase or in both. Divergent biphasic selection could yield distinct evolutionary rates for phase-specific or pleiotropic genes. Here, we analyze models that deal with antagonistic and synergistic selection between alternative generations in terms of the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous divergence (K(a)/K(s)). Effects of biphasic selection are opposite under antagonistic selection but cumulative under synergistic selection for pleiotropic genes. Under the additive and comparable strengths of biphasic allelic selection, the absolute K(a)/K(s) for the gametophyte gene is equal to in outcrossing but smaller than, in a mixed mating system, that for the sporophyte gene under antagonistic selection. The same pattern is predicted for K(a)/K(s) under synergistic selection. Selfing reduces efficacy of gametophytic selection. Other processes, including pollen and seed flow and genetic drift, reduce selection efficacy. The polymorphism (π(a)) at a nonsynonymous site is affected by the joint effects of selfing with gametophytic or sporophytic selection. Likewise, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphism (π(a)/π(s)) is also affected by the same joint effects. Gene flow and genetic drift have opposite effects on π(a) or π(a)/π(s) in interacting with gametophytic and sporophytic selection. We discuss implications of this theory for detecting natural selection in terms of K(a)/K(s) and for interpreting the evolutionary divergence among gametophyte-specific, sporophyte-specific, and pleiotropic genes. Oxford University Press 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10443736/ /pubmed/37561000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evad151 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Ling-Ling
Xiao, Yu
Wang, Xi
He, Zi-Han
Lv, Yan-Wen
Hu, Xin-Sheng
The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
title The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
title_full The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
title_fullStr The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
title_full_unstemmed The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
title_short The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
title_sort k(a) /k(s) and π(a) /π(s) ratios under different models of gametophytic and sporophytic selection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evad151
work_keys_str_mv AT lilingling thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT xiaoyu thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT wangxi thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT hezihan thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT lvyanwen thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT huxinsheng thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT lilingling kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT xiaoyu kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT wangxi kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT hezihan kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT lvyanwen kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection
AT huxinsheng kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection