Cargando…
The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection
Alternation of generations in plant life cycle provides a biological basis for natural selection occurring in either the gametophyte or the sporophyte phase or in both. Divergent biphasic selection could yield distinct evolutionary rates for phase-specific or pleiotropic genes. Here, we analyze mode...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evad151 |
_version_ | 1785093899509825536 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ling-Ling Xiao, Yu Wang, Xi He, Zi-Han Lv, Yan-Wen Hu, Xin-Sheng |
author_facet | Li, Ling-Ling Xiao, Yu Wang, Xi He, Zi-Han Lv, Yan-Wen Hu, Xin-Sheng |
author_sort | Li, Ling-Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Alternation of generations in plant life cycle provides a biological basis for natural selection occurring in either the gametophyte or the sporophyte phase or in both. Divergent biphasic selection could yield distinct evolutionary rates for phase-specific or pleiotropic genes. Here, we analyze models that deal with antagonistic and synergistic selection between alternative generations in terms of the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous divergence (K(a)/K(s)). Effects of biphasic selection are opposite under antagonistic selection but cumulative under synergistic selection for pleiotropic genes. Under the additive and comparable strengths of biphasic allelic selection, the absolute K(a)/K(s) for the gametophyte gene is equal to in outcrossing but smaller than, in a mixed mating system, that for the sporophyte gene under antagonistic selection. The same pattern is predicted for K(a)/K(s) under synergistic selection. Selfing reduces efficacy of gametophytic selection. Other processes, including pollen and seed flow and genetic drift, reduce selection efficacy. The polymorphism (π(a)) at a nonsynonymous site is affected by the joint effects of selfing with gametophytic or sporophytic selection. Likewise, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphism (π(a)/π(s)) is also affected by the same joint effects. Gene flow and genetic drift have opposite effects on π(a) or π(a)/π(s) in interacting with gametophytic and sporophytic selection. We discuss implications of this theory for detecting natural selection in terms of K(a)/K(s) and for interpreting the evolutionary divergence among gametophyte-specific, sporophyte-specific, and pleiotropic genes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10443736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104437362023-08-23 The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection Li, Ling-Ling Xiao, Yu Wang, Xi He, Zi-Han Lv, Yan-Wen Hu, Xin-Sheng Genome Biol Evol Article Alternation of generations in plant life cycle provides a biological basis for natural selection occurring in either the gametophyte or the sporophyte phase or in both. Divergent biphasic selection could yield distinct evolutionary rates for phase-specific or pleiotropic genes. Here, we analyze models that deal with antagonistic and synergistic selection between alternative generations in terms of the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous divergence (K(a)/K(s)). Effects of biphasic selection are opposite under antagonistic selection but cumulative under synergistic selection for pleiotropic genes. Under the additive and comparable strengths of biphasic allelic selection, the absolute K(a)/K(s) for the gametophyte gene is equal to in outcrossing but smaller than, in a mixed mating system, that for the sporophyte gene under antagonistic selection. The same pattern is predicted for K(a)/K(s) under synergistic selection. Selfing reduces efficacy of gametophytic selection. Other processes, including pollen and seed flow and genetic drift, reduce selection efficacy. The polymorphism (π(a)) at a nonsynonymous site is affected by the joint effects of selfing with gametophytic or sporophytic selection. Likewise, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphism (π(a)/π(s)) is also affected by the same joint effects. Gene flow and genetic drift have opposite effects on π(a) or π(a)/π(s) in interacting with gametophytic and sporophytic selection. We discuss implications of this theory for detecting natural selection in terms of K(a)/K(s) and for interpreting the evolutionary divergence among gametophyte-specific, sporophyte-specific, and pleiotropic genes. Oxford University Press 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10443736/ /pubmed/37561000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evad151 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Ling-Ling Xiao, Yu Wang, Xi He, Zi-Han Lv, Yan-Wen Hu, Xin-Sheng The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection |
title | The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection |
title_full | The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection |
title_fullStr | The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection |
title_short | The K(a) /K(s) and π(a) /π(s) Ratios under Different Models of Gametophytic and Sporophytic Selection |
title_sort | k(a) /k(s) and π(a) /π(s) ratios under different models of gametophytic and sporophytic selection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evad151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lilingling thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT xiaoyu thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT wangxi thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT hezihan thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT lvyanwen thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT huxinsheng thekaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT lilingling kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT xiaoyu kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT wangxi kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT hezihan kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT lvyanwen kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection AT huxinsheng kaksandpapsratiosunderdifferentmodelsofgametophyticandsporophyticselection |