Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to eluci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034927 |
_version_ | 1785093907664601088 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Pei-Chin Huang, Chun-Jung Lu, Yen-Ming Huang, Huei-Ling Wu, Zong-Ying Chang, Chih-Chun Chu, Fang-Yeh |
author_facet | Lin, Pei-Chin Huang, Chun-Jung Lu, Yen-Ming Huang, Huei-Ling Wu, Zong-Ying Chang, Chih-Chun Chu, Fang-Yeh |
author_sort | Lin, Pei-Chin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen between laboratory professionals and non-laboratory staff. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent both GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen testing and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between November 01, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between laboratory and non-laboratory operators, using RT-PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed based on the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value. Of the 11,963 patients, 1273 (10.6%) tested positive using real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test with 95% confidence interval were 79.92% (77.26%–82.39%), 99.23% (98.73%–99.57%), 103.25 (62.31–171.11), 0.2 (0.18–0.23), 510.18 (299.81–868.18), 98.11% (96.91%–98.85%), 90.75% (89.64%–91.75%) and 92.76% (91.76%–93.67%), respectively, for non–laboratory staff and 79.80% (74.78%–84.22%), 99.99% (99.94%–100.00%), 6983.92 (983.03–49617.00), 0.2 (0.16–0.25), 34566.45 (4770.30–250474.46) 99.58% (97.09%–99.94%), 99.32% (99.15%–99.46%), and 99.33% (99.13%–99.48%), respectively, for laboratory staff. Notably, when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25, the sensitivity of both the groups decreased to < 40%. The diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen performed by non-laboratory staff was comparable to that of laboratory professionals. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the antigen tests decreased when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25. Overall, the GenBody COVID-19 antigen test is a viable option for non-laboratory staff during an epidemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10443765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104437652023-08-23 Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study Lin, Pei-Chin Huang, Chun-Jung Lu, Yen-Ming Huang, Huei-Ling Wu, Zong-Ying Chang, Chih-Chun Chu, Fang-Yeh Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen between laboratory professionals and non-laboratory staff. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent both GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen testing and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between November 01, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between laboratory and non-laboratory operators, using RT-PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed based on the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value. Of the 11,963 patients, 1273 (10.6%) tested positive using real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test with 95% confidence interval were 79.92% (77.26%–82.39%), 99.23% (98.73%–99.57%), 103.25 (62.31–171.11), 0.2 (0.18–0.23), 510.18 (299.81–868.18), 98.11% (96.91%–98.85%), 90.75% (89.64%–91.75%) and 92.76% (91.76%–93.67%), respectively, for non–laboratory staff and 79.80% (74.78%–84.22%), 99.99% (99.94%–100.00%), 6983.92 (983.03–49617.00), 0.2 (0.16–0.25), 34566.45 (4770.30–250474.46) 99.58% (97.09%–99.94%), 99.32% (99.15%–99.46%), and 99.33% (99.13%–99.48%), respectively, for laboratory staff. Notably, when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25, the sensitivity of both the groups decreased to < 40%. The diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen performed by non-laboratory staff was comparable to that of laboratory professionals. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the antigen tests decreased when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25. Overall, the GenBody COVID-19 antigen test is a viable option for non-laboratory staff during an epidemic. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10443765/ /pubmed/37603502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034927 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 4900 Lin, Pei-Chin Huang, Chun-Jung Lu, Yen-Ming Huang, Huei-Ling Wu, Zong-Ying Chang, Chih-Chun Chu, Fang-Yeh Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study |
title | Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of genbody covid-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: a retrospective study |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linpeichin diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy AT huangchunjung diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy AT luyenming diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy AT huanghueiling diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy AT wuzongying diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy AT changchihchun diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy AT chufangyeh diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy |