Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study

Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to eluci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Pei-Chin, Huang, Chun-Jung, Lu, Yen-Ming, Huang, Huei-Ling, Wu, Zong-Ying, Chang, Chih-Chun, Chu, Fang-Yeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034927
_version_ 1785093907664601088
author Lin, Pei-Chin
Huang, Chun-Jung
Lu, Yen-Ming
Huang, Huei-Ling
Wu, Zong-Ying
Chang, Chih-Chun
Chu, Fang-Yeh
author_facet Lin, Pei-Chin
Huang, Chun-Jung
Lu, Yen-Ming
Huang, Huei-Ling
Wu, Zong-Ying
Chang, Chih-Chun
Chu, Fang-Yeh
author_sort Lin, Pei-Chin
collection PubMed
description Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen between laboratory professionals and non-laboratory staff. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent both GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen testing and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between November 01, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between laboratory and non-laboratory operators, using RT-PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed based on the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value. Of the 11,963 patients, 1273 (10.6%) tested positive using real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test with 95% confidence interval were 79.92% (77.26%–82.39%), 99.23% (98.73%–99.57%), 103.25 (62.31–171.11), 0.2 (0.18–0.23), 510.18 (299.81–868.18), 98.11% (96.91%–98.85%), 90.75% (89.64%–91.75%) and 92.76% (91.76%–93.67%), respectively, for non–laboratory staff and 79.80% (74.78%–84.22%), 99.99% (99.94%–100.00%), 6983.92 (983.03–49617.00), 0.2 (0.16–0.25), 34566.45 (4770.30–250474.46) 99.58% (97.09%–99.94%), 99.32% (99.15%–99.46%), and 99.33% (99.13%–99.48%), respectively, for laboratory staff. Notably, when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25, the sensitivity of both the groups decreased to < 40%. The diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen performed by non-laboratory staff was comparable to that of laboratory professionals. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the antigen tests decreased when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25. Overall, the GenBody COVID-19 antigen test is a viable option for non-laboratory staff during an epidemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10443765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104437652023-08-23 Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study Lin, Pei-Chin Huang, Chun-Jung Lu, Yen-Ming Huang, Huei-Ling Wu, Zong-Ying Chang, Chih-Chun Chu, Fang-Yeh Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen between laboratory professionals and non-laboratory staff. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent both GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen testing and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between November 01, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between laboratory and non-laboratory operators, using RT-PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed based on the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value. Of the 11,963 patients, 1273 (10.6%) tested positive using real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test with 95% confidence interval were 79.92% (77.26%–82.39%), 99.23% (98.73%–99.57%), 103.25 (62.31–171.11), 0.2 (0.18–0.23), 510.18 (299.81–868.18), 98.11% (96.91%–98.85%), 90.75% (89.64%–91.75%) and 92.76% (91.76%–93.67%), respectively, for non–laboratory staff and 79.80% (74.78%–84.22%), 99.99% (99.94%–100.00%), 6983.92 (983.03–49617.00), 0.2 (0.16–0.25), 34566.45 (4770.30–250474.46) 99.58% (97.09%–99.94%), 99.32% (99.15%–99.46%), and 99.33% (99.13%–99.48%), respectively, for laboratory staff. Notably, when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25, the sensitivity of both the groups decreased to < 40%. The diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen performed by non-laboratory staff was comparable to that of laboratory professionals. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the antigen tests decreased when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25. Overall, the GenBody COVID-19 antigen test is a viable option for non-laboratory staff during an epidemic. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10443765/ /pubmed/37603502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034927 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 4900
Lin, Pei-Chin
Huang, Chun-Jung
Lu, Yen-Ming
Huang, Huei-Ling
Wu, Zong-Ying
Chang, Chih-Chun
Chu, Fang-Yeh
Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
title Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
title_full Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
title_short Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study
title_sort diagnostic performance of genbody covid-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: a retrospective study
topic 4900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034927
work_keys_str_mv AT linpeichin diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT huangchunjung diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT luyenming diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT huanghueiling diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT wuzongying diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT changchihchun diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT chufangyeh diagnosticperformanceofgenbodycovid19rapidantigentestforlaboratoryandnonlaboratorymedicalprofessionalsinrealpracticearetrospectivestudy