Cargando…
Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke
Objectives To describe the characteristics, financing structures and challenges of regional dementia care networks and the use of regional financial network support according to § 45c para. 9 SGB XI. Methods The analysis was based on data from 120 dementia networks that provided information on the n...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1901-8403 |
_version_ | 1785093967179677696 |
---|---|
author | Michalowsky, Bernhard Afi, Adel Holle, Bernhard Thyrian, Jochen René Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Michalowsky, Bernhard Afi, Adel Holle, Bernhard Thyrian, Jochen René Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Michalowsky, Bernhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives To describe the characteristics, financing structures and challenges of regional dementia care networks and the use of regional financial network support according to § 45c para. 9 SGB XI. Methods The analysis was based on data from 120 dementia networks that provided information on the network characteristics (location, year of foundation, goals, organizational, personnel and financing structure), the challenges and the use of regional network funding according to § 45c Para. 9 SGB XI. Differences in the organizational, personnel and financing structure depending on the network characteristics were analyzed using t-Tests and ANOVA tests. The use of regional network funding (§ 45c Para. 9) were presented descriptively and discussed against the background of the planned amendment for 2022. Results The majority of networks were established between 2011 and 2015. Most networks had educational and care goals and, on average, 28 stakeholders. Medically-associated and longer-established networks and networks with a legal form had significantly more network partners, persons actively involved in the work of the network and funding sources. The linking of stakeholders and the funding were seen as the most significant challenges. Every tenth network received regional network funding (§45c para. 9) but 28% decided not to receive funding. For most networks (50%), the funding was still unknown. Conclusion Regional dementia networks are very heterogeneously structured. Certain factors can significantly affect the number of partners and funding sources and should, therefore, be considered. Up to now, only one network per region could receive the maximum amount (€20,000) of funding according to §45c para. 9, which limits the usability of this funding, especially in densely populated regions. The amendment now increases the number of networks to be funded within one region and the funding level. It remains to be seen to what extent this amendment will increase the use of the regional network funding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10444517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104445172023-08-23 Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke Michalowsky, Bernhard Afi, Adel Holle, Bernhard Thyrian, Jochen René Hoffmann, Wolfgang Gesundheitswesen Objectives To describe the characteristics, financing structures and challenges of regional dementia care networks and the use of regional financial network support according to § 45c para. 9 SGB XI. Methods The analysis was based on data from 120 dementia networks that provided information on the network characteristics (location, year of foundation, goals, organizational, personnel and financing structure), the challenges and the use of regional network funding according to § 45c Para. 9 SGB XI. Differences in the organizational, personnel and financing structure depending on the network characteristics were analyzed using t-Tests and ANOVA tests. The use of regional network funding (§ 45c Para. 9) were presented descriptively and discussed against the background of the planned amendment for 2022. Results The majority of networks were established between 2011 and 2015. Most networks had educational and care goals and, on average, 28 stakeholders. Medically-associated and longer-established networks and networks with a legal form had significantly more network partners, persons actively involved in the work of the network and funding sources. The linking of stakeholders and the funding were seen as the most significant challenges. Every tenth network received regional network funding (§45c para. 9) but 28% decided not to receive funding. For most networks (50%), the funding was still unknown. Conclusion Regional dementia networks are very heterogeneously structured. Certain factors can significantly affect the number of partners and funding sources and should, therefore, be considered. Up to now, only one network per region could receive the maximum amount (€20,000) of funding according to §45c para. 9, which limits the usability of this funding, especially in densely populated regions. The amendment now increases the number of networks to be funded within one region and the funding level. It remains to be seen to what extent this amendment will increase the use of the regional network funding. Georg Thieme Verlag 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10444517/ /pubmed/36084945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1901-8403 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Michalowsky, Bernhard Afi, Adel Holle, Bernhard Thyrian, Jochen René Hoffmann, Wolfgang Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke |
title | Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und
Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke |
title_full | Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und
Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke |
title_fullStr | Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und
Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke |
title_full_unstemmed | Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und
Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke |
title_short | Regionale Gesundheitsnetzwerke in Deutschland: Charakteristik und
Finanzierung am Beispiel regionaler Demenznetzwerke |
title_sort | regionale gesundheitsnetzwerke in deutschland: charakteristik und
finanzierung am beispiel regionaler demenznetzwerke |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1901-8403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michalowskybernhard regionalegesundheitsnetzwerkeindeutschlandcharakteristikundfinanzierungambeispielregionalerdemenznetzwerke AT afiadel regionalegesundheitsnetzwerkeindeutschlandcharakteristikundfinanzierungambeispielregionalerdemenznetzwerke AT hollebernhard regionalegesundheitsnetzwerkeindeutschlandcharakteristikundfinanzierungambeispielregionalerdemenznetzwerke AT thyrianjochenrene regionalegesundheitsnetzwerkeindeutschlandcharakteristikundfinanzierungambeispielregionalerdemenznetzwerke AT hoffmannwolfgang regionalegesundheitsnetzwerkeindeutschlandcharakteristikundfinanzierungambeispielregionalerdemenznetzwerke |