Cargando…

Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed

AIMS: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model. METHODS: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chunliang, Liu, Shih-Jung, Chang, Chung-Hsun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1
_version_ 1785093970839207936
author Wang, Chunliang
Liu, Shih-Jung
Chang, Chung-Hsun
author_facet Wang, Chunliang
Liu, Shih-Jung
Chang, Chung-Hsun
author_sort Wang, Chunliang
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model. METHODS: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis. RESULTS: This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option. CONCLUSION: Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(8):504–511.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10444534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104445342023-08-23 Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed Wang, Chunliang Liu, Shih-Jung Chang, Chung-Hsun Bone Joint Res Biomechanics AIMS: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model. METHODS: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis. RESULTS: This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option. CONCLUSION: Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(8):504–511. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10444534/ /pubmed/37607719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1 Text en © 2023 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDMThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Biomechanics
Wang, Chunliang
Liu, Shih-Jung
Chang, Chung-Hsun
Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
title Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
title_full Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
title_fullStr Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
title_full_unstemmed Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
title_short Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
title_sort thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
topic Biomechanics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchunliang thicknessofsimplecalcanealtuberosityavulsionfracturesinfluencestheoptimalfixationmethodemployed
AT liushihjung thicknessofsimplecalcanealtuberosityavulsionfracturesinfluencestheoptimalfixationmethodemployed
AT changchunghsun thicknessofsimplecalcanealtuberosityavulsionfracturesinfluencestheoptimalfixationmethodemployed