Cargando…
Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed
AIMS: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model. METHODS: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1 |
_version_ | 1785093970839207936 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Chunliang Liu, Shih-Jung Chang, Chung-Hsun |
author_facet | Wang, Chunliang Liu, Shih-Jung Chang, Chung-Hsun |
author_sort | Wang, Chunliang |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model. METHODS: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis. RESULTS: This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option. CONCLUSION: Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(8):504–511. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10444534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104445342023-08-23 Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed Wang, Chunliang Liu, Shih-Jung Chang, Chung-Hsun Bone Joint Res Biomechanics AIMS: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model. METHODS: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis. RESULTS: This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option. CONCLUSION: Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(8):504–511. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10444534/ /pubmed/37607719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1 Text en © 2023 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDMThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Biomechanics Wang, Chunliang Liu, Shih-Jung Chang, Chung-Hsun Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
title | Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
title_full | Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
title_fullStr | Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
title_full_unstemmed | Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
title_short | Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
title_sort | thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed |
topic | Biomechanics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangchunliang thicknessofsimplecalcanealtuberosityavulsionfracturesinfluencestheoptimalfixationmethodemployed AT liushihjung thicknessofsimplecalcanealtuberosityavulsionfracturesinfluencestheoptimalfixationmethodemployed AT changchunghsun thicknessofsimplecalcanealtuberosityavulsionfracturesinfluencestheoptimalfixationmethodemployed |