Cargando…
Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT: Dietary protein intake in the first year of life might influence later growth. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the growth effects of interventions based on infant formula composition providing different amounts of protein within the first year of life of healthy term infant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02531-3 |
_version_ | 1785093987840819200 |
---|---|
author | Milani, Gregorio P. Edefonti, Valeria De Cosmi, Valentina Bettocchi, Silvia Mazzocchi, Alessandra Silano, Marco Pietrobelli, Angelo Agostoni, Carlo |
author_facet | Milani, Gregorio P. Edefonti, Valeria De Cosmi, Valentina Bettocchi, Silvia Mazzocchi, Alessandra Silano, Marco Pietrobelli, Angelo Agostoni, Carlo |
author_sort | Milani, Gregorio P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Dietary protein intake in the first year of life might influence later growth. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the growth effects of interventions based on infant formula composition providing different amounts of protein within the first year of life of healthy term infants; in the absence of other comparable information over the investigated period, a meta-analysis further compared weight or length gain at 120 days from high- (>2.0 g/100 kcal) and low-protein (≤2.0 g/100 kcal) content formula groups. Twelve papers (n = 2275) were included and five of them (n = 677) contributed to the meta-analysis. Most studies compared a high-protein formula, a low-protein formula, and breastfeeding. Evidence from the systematic review was inconclusive due to heterogeneity in design and treatments. In the presence of modest heterogeneity but in the absence of publication bias, the weighted mean difference for weight gain at 120 days was –0.02 g/day (95% CI: –1.41, 1.45); with higher heterogeneity, the weighted MD estimate of length gain at 120 days was 0.004 cm/month (95% CI: –0.26, 0.27). Although limited and underpowered, evidence from the meta-analysis does not support the assumption that high- vs. low-protein content formulas during exclusive milk-feeding lead to different growth outcomes in the first months of life. Prospero registration number: CRD42017058535. IMPACT: The optimal amount of dietary protein that should be given to healthy full-term infants early in life is still debated. Despite heterogeneity in study design, treatments, and outcomes, this systematic review showed that there is no clear-cut effect on the growth of different amounts of protein intake from formulas or complementary feeding. Evidence from the meta-analysis based on the five articles enrolling infants <1 month of life does not support the previous assumption that high- vs. low-protein content formulas during exclusive milk-feeding lead to different growth outcomes in the first 4 months of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10444617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104446172023-08-24 Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis Milani, Gregorio P. Edefonti, Valeria De Cosmi, Valentina Bettocchi, Silvia Mazzocchi, Alessandra Silano, Marco Pietrobelli, Angelo Agostoni, Carlo Pediatr Res Systematic Review ABSTRACT: Dietary protein intake in the first year of life might influence later growth. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the growth effects of interventions based on infant formula composition providing different amounts of protein within the first year of life of healthy term infants; in the absence of other comparable information over the investigated period, a meta-analysis further compared weight or length gain at 120 days from high- (>2.0 g/100 kcal) and low-protein (≤2.0 g/100 kcal) content formula groups. Twelve papers (n = 2275) were included and five of them (n = 677) contributed to the meta-analysis. Most studies compared a high-protein formula, a low-protein formula, and breastfeeding. Evidence from the systematic review was inconclusive due to heterogeneity in design and treatments. In the presence of modest heterogeneity but in the absence of publication bias, the weighted mean difference for weight gain at 120 days was –0.02 g/day (95% CI: –1.41, 1.45); with higher heterogeneity, the weighted MD estimate of length gain at 120 days was 0.004 cm/month (95% CI: –0.26, 0.27). Although limited and underpowered, evidence from the meta-analysis does not support the assumption that high- vs. low-protein content formulas during exclusive milk-feeding lead to different growth outcomes in the first months of life. Prospero registration number: CRD42017058535. IMPACT: The optimal amount of dietary protein that should be given to healthy full-term infants early in life is still debated. Despite heterogeneity in study design, treatments, and outcomes, this systematic review showed that there is no clear-cut effect on the growth of different amounts of protein intake from formulas or complementary feeding. Evidence from the meta-analysis based on the five articles enrolling infants <1 month of life does not support the previous assumption that high- vs. low-protein content formulas during exclusive milk-feeding lead to different growth outcomes in the first 4 months of life. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-03-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10444617/ /pubmed/36941339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02531-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Milani, Gregorio P. Edefonti, Valeria De Cosmi, Valentina Bettocchi, Silvia Mazzocchi, Alessandra Silano, Marco Pietrobelli, Angelo Agostoni, Carlo Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | protein and growth during the first year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02531-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milanigregoriop proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT edefontivaleria proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT decosmivalentina proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bettocchisilvia proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mazzocchialessandra proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT silanomarco proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pietrobelliangelo proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT agostonicarlo proteinandgrowthduringthefirstyearoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |