Cargando…
The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i) (TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001 |
_version_ | 1785094007515250688 |
---|---|
author | Wendt, Karen Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian Stagg, Charlotte J. Fleming, Melanie K. Denison, Timothy O'Shea, Jacinta |
author_facet | Wendt, Karen Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian Stagg, Charlotte J. Fleming, Melanie K. Denison, Timothy O'Shea, Jacinta |
author_sort | Wendt, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i) (TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, predicting stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS). OBJECTIVE: Using pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce a stronger plasticity effect than biphasic, measured as induced increases in motor corticospinal excitability. METHODS: In a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as increases in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 min after iTBS. RESULTS: Both monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, linear mixed effects (LME) models showed that the iTBS condition had a significant effect on the MEP amplitude (χ(2) (1) = 27.615, p < 0.001) with monophasic iTBS leading to significantly stronger plasticity than biphasic iTBS (t (693) = 2.311, p = 0.021). Control vertex iTBS had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10444700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104447002023-08-24 The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS Wendt, Karen Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian Stagg, Charlotte J. Fleming, Melanie K. Denison, Timothy O'Shea, Jacinta Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i) (TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, predicting stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS). OBJECTIVE: Using pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce a stronger plasticity effect than biphasic, measured as induced increases in motor corticospinal excitability. METHODS: In a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as increases in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 min after iTBS. RESULTS: Both monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, linear mixed effects (LME) models showed that the iTBS condition had a significant effect on the MEP amplitude (χ(2) (1) = 27.615, p < 0.001) with monophasic iTBS leading to significantly stronger plasticity than biphasic iTBS (t (693) = 2.311, p = 0.021). Control vertex iTBS had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS. Elsevier 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10444700/ /pubmed/37543172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wendt, Karen Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian Stagg, Charlotte J. Fleming, Melanie K. Denison, Timothy O'Shea, Jacinta The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS |
title | The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS |
title_full | The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS |
title_fullStr | The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS |
title_short | The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS |
title_sort | effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: monophasic vs biphasic tms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wendtkaren theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT sorkhabimajidmemarian theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT staggcharlottej theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT flemingmelaniek theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT denisontimothy theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT osheajacinta theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT wendtkaren effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT sorkhabimajidmemarian effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT staggcharlottej effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT flemingmelaniek effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT denisontimothy effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms AT osheajacinta effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms |