Cargando…

The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS

BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i) (TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendt, Karen, Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian, Stagg, Charlotte J., Fleming, Melanie K., Denison, Timothy, O'Shea, Jacinta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001
_version_ 1785094007515250688
author Wendt, Karen
Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian
Stagg, Charlotte J.
Fleming, Melanie K.
Denison, Timothy
O'Shea, Jacinta
author_facet Wendt, Karen
Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian
Stagg, Charlotte J.
Fleming, Melanie K.
Denison, Timothy
O'Shea, Jacinta
author_sort Wendt, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i) (TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, predicting stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS). OBJECTIVE: Using pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce a stronger plasticity effect than biphasic, measured as induced increases in motor corticospinal excitability. METHODS: In a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as increases in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 min after iTBS. RESULTS: Both monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, linear mixed effects (LME) models showed that the iTBS condition had a significant effect on the MEP amplitude (χ(2) (1) = 27.615, p < 0.001) with monophasic iTBS leading to significantly stronger plasticity than biphasic iTBS (t (693) = 2.311, p = 0.021). Control vertex iTBS had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10444700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104447002023-08-24 The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS Wendt, Karen Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian Stagg, Charlotte J. Fleming, Melanie K. Denison, Timothy O'Shea, Jacinta Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (i) (TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, predicting stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS). OBJECTIVE: Using pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce a stronger plasticity effect than biphasic, measured as induced increases in motor corticospinal excitability. METHODS: In a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as increases in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 min after iTBS. RESULTS: Both monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, linear mixed effects (LME) models showed that the iTBS condition had a significant effect on the MEP amplitude (χ(2) (1) = 27.615, p < 0.001) with monophasic iTBS leading to significantly stronger plasticity than biphasic iTBS (t (693) = 2.311, p = 0.021). Control vertex iTBS had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS. Elsevier 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10444700/ /pubmed/37543172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wendt, Karen
Sorkhabi, Majid Memarian
Stagg, Charlotte J.
Fleming, Melanie K.
Denison, Timothy
O'Shea, Jacinta
The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
title The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
title_full The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
title_fullStr The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
title_full_unstemmed The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
title_short The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS
title_sort effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: monophasic vs biphasic tms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT wendtkaren theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT sorkhabimajidmemarian theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT staggcharlottej theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT flemingmelaniek theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT denisontimothy theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT osheajacinta theeffectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT wendtkaren effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT sorkhabimajidmemarian effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT staggcharlottej effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT flemingmelaniek effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT denisontimothy effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms
AT osheajacinta effectofpulseshapeinthetaburststimulationmonophasicvsbiphasictms